Skip to main content

The Theory of Symbolic Universes and Cognitive Sociology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post)Crisis

Abstract

This chapter is a commentary on key dimensions of an important emerging cultural psychological theory identifying the salience of ‘symbolic universes’ in modern political and social life. The commentary is broken down into a minor and a major part. The minor part consists of a short recapitulation of the theory’s main dimensions. The account is selective, foregrounding key issues to be addressed in the major part. This major part consists of placing the theory in relation to another theory on which the author is actively engaged, the Cork tradition of cognitive sociology, finding differences between the approaches within the framework of modern epistemological-ontological thinking in the social sciences, but ultimately finding them complementary and with good cooperation potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Badiou, A. (2007). Being and event. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2009). Theory of the subject. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Open Road.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (1997). Reflexivity, agency and constraint: The paradoxes of Bourdieu’s sociology of knowledge. Social Epistemology, 11(2), 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1893/1984). The Division of Labour in Society. New York: Free Press. (original work in French 1893).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eder, K. (1985). Geschichte als Lernprozeß? Zur Pathogenese politischer Modernität in Deutschland [History as a learning process? The pathogenesis of political modernity in Germany]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2007). The right to justification: Elements of a constructivist theory of justice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorf, L. (2009). Luhmann reconsidered: Steps towards an empirical research programme in the sociology of communication? In C. Grant (Ed.), Beyond formal pragmatics: Essays in the philosophy of communication (pp. 149–176). Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1980). Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft [Social structure and semantics: Studies on the sociology of knowledge of modern society]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a social system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. M. (1980). Peirce’s logic of relations and other studies. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. (1986). Kollektive Lernprozesse: Studien zur Grundlegung einer soziologischen Lerntheorie [Collective learning: Studies on the foundation of a sociological learning theory]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, P. (2013). The contemporary theory of the public sphere. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, P. (2014). Europe, crisis, and critique: Social theory and transnational society. European Journal of Social Theory, 17(3), 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1992). The Essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings: Vol. 1. (1867–1893). In N. Houser & C. Kloesel. (Eds.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S., Fini, V., Mannarini, T., Valsiner, J., & Veltri, G. (Eds.). (2018). What future for Europe? Symbolic universes in the time of (post)crisis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strydom, P. (2011). Contemporary critical theory and methodology. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strydom, P. (2012). Cosmopolitanism, the cognitive order of modernity, and conflicting models of world openness: On the prospects of collective learning. In A. Giri (Ed.), Cosmopolitanism and Beyond: Towards Planetary Transformation (pp. 71–94). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strydom, P. (2017a). The socio-cultural creation of a natural category: Social theoretical reflections on human agency under the temporal conditions of the Anthropocene. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strydom, P. (2017b). Infinity, infinite processes and limit concepts: Recovering a neglected background of social and critical theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 43, 793–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (1977). The self-production of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick O’Mahony .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

O’Mahony, P. (2019). The Theory of Symbolic Universes and Cognitive Sociology. In: Salvatore, S., Fini, V., Mannarini, T., Valsiner, J., Veltri, G. (eds) Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post)Crisis. Culture in Policy Making: The Symbolic Universes of Social Action. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19496-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19497-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics