Skip to main content

Post-democratic Crisis and Political Leadership. From Crisis Management to Crisis Creation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post)Crisis

Abstract

This chapter substantiates the idea of a post-democratic crisis—a new type of political crisis characterized by its growing dissociation from ontological reality—the political crisis over migration is reaching white-hot peaks today despite the substantial decline of migration flows. The post-democratic crisis is liquefied—it depends less and less on external manifestations and determinants, and more and more on the voluntaristic strategies of mega leaders. The new crisis is examined in the analytical triangle of post-democracy—post-truth—mega leadership. This challenging interpretation of the crisis is substantiated in three steps. The first part of the chapter argues that the crisis is not (only) a problem of inefficient governance but, rather, a fundamental self-definition of contemporary society and politics. This part combines conceptual history a la Koselleck, looking at the evolution of paradigmatic ideas and value systems over time, with discourse and political analysis of the concepts, narratives, images and imaginaries of the crisis. The second part analyses the paradox between the decrease of migration flows and the increase and exacerbation of the migration crisis. This is an emblematic example for the author’s thesis that “If the migration crises did not exist, post-democratic leaders would have invented them”. The third part asks the question how legitimacy, borders, politics and security are reshaped in times of post-democratic crises and examines four major trends the latter interfere with: from a crisis of legitimacy to legitimacy of the crisis; from migration crisis to rebordering; from party politics to symbolic politics; from managing (in)security to mainstreaming securitization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While I was finalizing this chapter, the episode was repeated in August 2018—Italy again refused to accept the Aquarius, which was carrying 114 migrants onboard. Later, other rescue ships were also turned away.

  2. 2.

    June–July 2018.

  3. 3.

    According to D. Tusk at the informal Summit in Saztburg on Sept 19, 2018.

  4. 4.

    August 2018.

References

  • Abrahamsen, R. (2005). Blair’s Africa: The politics of securitization and fear. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 30(1), 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzacq, T. (2016). Théories de la sécurité. Les approches critiques [Theories of security. Critical approaches]. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Bordoni, C. (2014). State of crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a Critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27(1), 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boin, et al. (2005). The politics of crisis management. Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonneville, L. (2017). Critique de la crise, critique des discours de crise [Criticism of the crisis, criticism of crisis speeches]. In C. Constantopoulou (Ed.), Récits de la crise: Mythes et réalités de la société contemporaine (pp. 347–354). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briken, K., & Eick, V. (2011). Policing the crisis—Policing in crisis. Social Justice, 38(1/2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, Vol. 1: The information age: Economy, society and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2018a). Rupture. The crisis of liberal democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (Ed.). (2018b). Europe’s crises (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2018). Societal security and crisis management. Governance capacity and legitimacy. Introduction. In P. Lægreid & L. H. Rykkja (Eds.), Societal security and crisis management: Governance capacity and legitimacy (pp. 1–23). Chan, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantopoulou, C. (Ed.). (2017). Récits de la crise: Mythes et réalités de la société contemporaine [Stories of the crisis: Myths and realities of contemporary society]. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. (1995). La crise de l’intelligence. Essai sur l’impuissance des élites à se réformer [The crisis of intelligence. Essay on the inability of elites to reform]. Paris: InterEditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobry, M., & Sage, D. (2009). Sociologie des crises politiques. La dynamique des mobilisations multisectorielles [Sociology of the political crisis. The dynamic of the multisectoral mobilization]. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po. Kindle edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drozdiak, W. (2017). Fractured continent: Europe’s crisis and the fate of the West. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubet, F., & Sage, D. (2014). La préférence pour l’inégalité. Comprendre la crise des solidarités [The preference for inequality. To understand the crisis of solidarity]. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraly, A. (2017). Légitimité de la crise, crise de la légitimité [Legitimacy of the crisis, crisis of legitimacy]. In C. Constantopoulou (Ed.), Récits de la crise: Mythes et réalités de la société contemporaine (pp. 51–58). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2017). The new urban crisis: How our cities are increasing inequality, deepening segregation, and failing the middle class. New York: Basic Books. Kindle edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York/Toronto/Oxford: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, R. J. (1997). The idea of crisis in modern sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 38(4), 502–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2006). (M. W. Richter, Trans.). Crisis. Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(2), 357–400. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30141882?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasteva, A. (2004). Le conflit politique post-communiste [The post-communist political conflict]. In A. Krasteva & A. Todorov (Eds.), Conflits, confiance, démocratie. Sofia: Presses de la NUB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasteva, A. (2017a). Editorial of special focus: Securitisation and its impact on human rights and human security. Global Campus of Human Rights Journal, 1(2). https://globalcampus.eiuc.org/handle/20.500.11825/427.

  • Krasteva, A. (2017b, on line first). If borders did not exist, Euroscepticism would have invented them, or on post-communist Re/De/Re/Bordering in Bulgaria. GeoPolitics. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14650045.2017.1398142.

  • Krasteva, A., Saarinen, A., & Siim, B. (2018). Citizens’ activism for reimagining and reinventing citizenship countering far-right populism. In B. Siim, A. Krasteva, & A. Saarinen (Eds.), Citizens’ activism and solidarity movements: Contending with populism. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology (pp. 265–292). Chan, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (Eds.). (2018). Societal security and crisis management: Governance capacity and legitimacy. Chan, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannarini, T. M., Velti, G. M., & Salvatore, S. (in preparation). Portrays of otherness. Mapping change and continuity in the European media representations of immigrants, Muslims, and LGBT. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the construction of security. Glasgow: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mucha, J., & Krzyzowski, L. (2013). “Crisis, critique and change”. Sociology of Europe at the beginning of the 21st century. Polish Sociological Review, 184, 543–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1968). The will to power. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revault d’Allonnes, M. (2012). La crise sans fin. Essai sur l’expérience moderne du temps [The endless crisis. Essay on the modern experience of time]. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (2007). The concept of the political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, M. (2017). La crise et la politique des avenirs [The crisis and the politics of the future]. In C. Constantopoulou (Ed.), Récits de la crise. Mythes et réalités de la société contemporaine (pp. 9–19). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurk, J. (2017). Récits de crise, récits d’affinités électives [Stories of crisis, stories of elective affinities]. In C. Constantopoulou (Ed.), Récits de la crise. Mythes et réalités de la societe contemporaine (pp. 67–72). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (2014). After the crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press. (first published in French, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Treguer, F. (2016). From deep State illegality to law of the land: the case of Internet surveillance in France. In Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Societe. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01306332/

  • Vandelli, L., & Guerard, S. (2017). The impact of the economic crisis on local governments in Europe. Varenne: Institut Universitaire Varenne.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Houtum, H., & van Naerssen, T. (2002). Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 93(2), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan-Williams, N. (2015). Europe’s border crisis: Biopolitical security and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Krasteva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krasteva, A. (2019). Post-democratic Crisis and Political Leadership. From Crisis Management to Crisis Creation. In: Salvatore, S., Fini, V., Mannarini, T., Valsiner, J., Veltri, G. (eds) Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post)Crisis. Culture in Policy Making: The Symbolic Universes of Social Action. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19496-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19497-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics