Skip to main content

The Rise of Psychopharmacological Fiction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Representations of Science in Twenty-First-Century Fiction

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine ((PLSM))

  • 488 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter surveys narrative fiction published since the 1980s that incorporates discourses from pharmacology. While fiction has explored drugs and drug effects since the nineteenth century, recent works take seriously the science of human cognition in unprecedented ways. The pharmacological sciences offer particularly interesting fodder for contemporary fiction because the object of inquiry—the drug—is somewhere between science and technology, a medicinal substance and a product of manufacture. This opens up questions about the mind versus the brain, medical treatment versus optimization, the risk of addiction, and the question of what it means to be a natural human. In so doing, these works explore what is at stake in a risk society, particularly by honing the logic of the pharmakon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Works Cited

  • Armstrong, Nancy (1987). Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M.M. (1981) [1934–5]. “Discourse in the Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. M. Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 259–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich, Anthony Giddens, and Scott Lash (1994). Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beowulf: A New Verse Translation (2000). Trans. Seamus Heaney. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell, Lawrence (2001). Writing for an Endangered World: Literature, Culture, and Environment in the U.S. and Beyond. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 30–54.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Wilkie (2008) [1868]. The Moonstone. Ed. John Sutherland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Joseph (2016) [1899]. Heart of Darkness. Ed. Paul B. Armstrong. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, Ashley M. (2007). “A Lesson Learnt: The Rise and Fall of Lariam and Halfan.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 100.4: 170–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boever, Arne (2013). Narrative Care: Biopolitics and the Novel. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLillo, Don (1984–5). White Noise. New York: Quality Paperback Book Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Quincey, Thomas (2013) [1821]. “Confessions of an English Opium Eater.” Confessions of an English Opium Eater and Other Writings. Ed. Robert Morrison. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1981). “Plato’s Pharmacy.” Dissemination. Trans. Barbara Johnson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 61–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, Gerard (2005). Doctor Salt. London: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, Jonathan (2001). The Corrections. London: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, Alan (2001). The Dark Fields. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailey, Arthur (1984). Strong Medicine. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, Ursula K. (2004). “Toxins, Drugs, and Global System: Risk and Narrative in the Contemporary Novel.” The Holodeck in the Garden: Science and Technology in Contemporary American Fiction. Eds. Peter Freese and Charles B. Harris. Normal, IL: Dalkey Archive. 263–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, Christopher (2011). Pharmacology. Las Vegas: Amazon Encore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, John (2009). “When Science Fiction Writers Used Fictional Drugs: Rise and Fall of the Twentieth-Century Drug Dystopia.” Utopian Studies 20.1: 141–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Aldous. (n.d.). Brave New World (1964). London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenner, F.A. (1994). “Medicine and Addiction.” Beyond the Pleasure Dome: Writing and Addiction from the Romantics. Eds. Sue Vice, Matthew Campbell, and Tim Armstrong. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press. 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Gary (2008). “Consciousness as Content: Neuronarratives and the Redemption of Fiction.” Mosaic 41.1: 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhofer, Anton, and Natalie Roxburgh (2016). “The Scientist as ‘Problematic Individual’ in Contemporary Anglophone Fiction.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 64.2: 148–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirn, Walter (1999). Thumbsucker. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, Irving (2009). The Emperor’s New Drugs: Exploding the Antidepressant Myth. London: Bodley Head, 2009. 3. Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Ira (1970). The Perfect Day. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, Ken (2012). Intrusion. London: Little, Brown Book Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, Stephanie (2005). “Pinch of Salt.” The Observer. 9 Jan 2005. Web. 19 Jan. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patchett, Ann (2011). State of Wonder. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, Alexander (1998) [1712, 1736]. The Rape of the Lock. Ed. Cynthia Wall. Boston: Bedford. 50–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, Richard (2009). Generosity: An Enhancement. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebble, Lucy (2012). The Effect. London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, Anne (2007). “Introduction.” Neurology and Literature, 1860–1920. Houndmills: Palgrave. 1–23.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tevis, Walter (1980). Mockingbird. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vice, Sue, Matthew Campbell, and Tim Armstrong (1994). Beyond the Pleasure Dome: Writing and Addiction from the Romantics. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenborn, Dirk (2008). Pharmakon… or the Story of a Happy Family. New York, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zunshine, Lisa (2006). Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roxburgh, N. (2019). The Rise of Psychopharmacological Fiction. In: Engelhardt, N., Hoydis, J. (eds) Representations of Science in Twenty-First-Century Fiction. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19490-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics