Skip to main content

Identity, Memory, and Technoscientific Ethics: Limits, Edges, and Borders in The Forbidden Zone

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 462 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine ((PLSM))

Abstract

Moll applies feminist technoscience theories of Karen Barad, Katie King, and Donna Haraway to Duncan Macmillan and Katie Mitchell’s play The Forbidden Zone, revealing how it poses epistemological challenges to how the history and ethics of science are often narrated onstage. The play depicts historical figures Clara Immerwahr and her granddaughter Claire Haber, two women scientists with connections to chemical weapons research, and their respective suicides. The play uses experimental theatrical techniques, including live cinema, to explore the ethical-political ramifications of chemical weapons research and its relationship to sexism and other oppressions. In the play, this weapon development symbolizes and creates a modernity defined by apocalypse, as part of a tradition of critique which spans from Virginia Woolf and Mary Borden to Barad and Haraway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This analysis will use the Barbican production as well as the unpublished script by Macmillan.

  2. 2.

    Compare either character, for example, to Sophocles’ tragic heroine Antigone, who is often held up (rightly or not) as a symbol of both revolution and women’s power, who chooses death rather than dishonoring the beloved dead, and who claims that the laws of the gods overrule the laws of corrupt men.

  3. 3.

    As King’s essay suggests, Donna Haraway has also put forth arguments about the masculinist, colonial nature of the god’s-eye fantasy of unmediated knowledge.

  4. 4.

    An interesting comparison is to Hannah Höch’s photomontage work, which makes the physical cut of the page visible; according to Maud Lavin’s Cut with the Kitchen Knife (1994), the visibility of the cut is central to the Höch’s feminist and political statements.

  5. 5.

    Feminist technoscience, Science and Technology Studies, and other scholars have offered numerous critiques of this Enlightenment view of science, which is often considered to still be the basis for predominant understandings of what science is today; examples of such critique may be found in Haraway (1997) and Schiebinger (1993).

  6. 6.

    For a fuller account of Brechtian theory’s relationship to feminist theater, see Diamond’s Unmaking Mimesis (1997).

Works Cited

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thank-you to Duncan Macmillan, and Rachel Taylor and Helena Clark at his representation company, for providing access to the playscript for my study of this play.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moll, E. (2019). Identity, Memory, and Technoscientific Ethics: Limits, Edges, and Borders in The Forbidden Zone. In: Engelhardt, N., Hoydis, J. (eds) Representations of Science in Twenty-First-Century Fiction. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19490-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics