Skip to main content

A Model for Three-Phase Flow in Porous Media with Rate-Dependent Capillary Pressure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Celebration of the EDGE Program’s Impact on the Mathematics Community and Beyond

Part of the book series: Association for Women in Mathematics Series ((AWMS,volume 18))

  • 331 Accesses

Abstract

As a contaminant, such as oil, travels through a porous media, such as soil, there is contact between the contaminant, groundwater, and the intermediate gas, air. At this interface there is a pressure difference, capillary pressure, which impacts the flow of the contaminant through the porous media. We derive a model for three-phase flow in porous media with the inclusion of capillary pressure, as given by thermodynamically constrained averaging theory (TCAT). Starting with conservation of mass, an incompressibility condition, and Darcy’s law, we include constitutive equations that extend a strictly hyperbolic system analyzed by Juanes and Patzek. In the absence of gravity and capillarity, they show that solutions include rarefaction waves and shocks which satisfy the Liu entropy criterion. By incorporating capillary pressure, we show that the model gains dissipation and dispersion terms, the latter of which is rate-dependent. This extends the framework developed by Hayes and LeFloch in which there are solutions involving shocks which do not satisfy the Liu entropy criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barenblatt GI, Vinnichenko AP (1980) Non-equilibrium seepage of immiscible fluids. Adv Mech 3(3):35–50

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell JB, Trangenstein JA, Shubin GR (1986) Conservation laws of mixed type describing three-phase flow in porous media. SIAM J Appl Math 46(6):1000–1017

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Corapcioglu MY, Hossain MA (1990) Ground-water contamination by high-density immiscible hydrocarbon slugs in gravity-driven gravel aquifers. Ground Water 28(3):403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DiCarlo DA (2004) Experimental measurements of saturation overshoot on infiltration. Water Resour Res 40: W04215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DiCarlo DA, Juanes R, LaForce T, Witelski TP (2008) Nonmonotonic traveling wave solutions of infiltration into porous media. Water Resour Res 44:W02406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eckberg DK, Sunada DK (1984) Nonsteady three-phase immiscible fluid distribution in porous media. Water Resour Res 20(12):1891–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans, LC (1998) Partial Differential Equations. AMS, Providence, Rhode Island

    Google Scholar 

  8. Essaid HI, Bekins BA, Cozzarelli IM (2015) Organic contaminant transport and fate in the subsurface: Evolution of knowledge and understanding. Water Resour Res 51:4861–4902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray WG, Dye AL, McClure JE, Pyrak-Nolte LJ, Miller CT (2015) On the dynamics and kinematics of two-fluid-phase flow in porous media. Water Resour Res 51:5365–5381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gray WG, Miller CT (2011) TCAT analysis of capillary pressure in non-equilibrium, two-fluid-phase, porous medium systems. Adv Water Resour 34:770–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gray WG, Miller CT (2014) Introduction to the Thermodynamically Constrained Averaging Theory for porous media systems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gray WG, Miller CT, Schrefler BA (2013) Averaging theory for description of environmental problems: What have we learned?. Adv Water Resour 51:123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hassanizadeh SM, Gray WG (1990) Mechanics and thermodynamics of multiphase flow in porous media including interphase boundaries. Adv Water Resour 13:169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassanizadeh SM, Gray WG (1993) Thermodynamic basis of capillary pressure in porous media. Water Resour Res 29:3389–3405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hayes BT, LeFloch PG (2000) Nonclassical shocks and kinetic relations: strictly hyperbolic systems. SIAM J Math Anal 31(5):941–991

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hersher R (2017) Key moments in the Dakota Access Pipeline fight. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/22/514988040/key-moments-in-the-dakota-access-pipeline-fight. Accessed 12 June 2018

  17. Holden L (1990) On the strict hyperbolicity of the Buckley-Leverett equation for three-phase flow in a porous medium. SIAM J Appl Math 50(3):667–682

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Illangasekare TH, Ramsey Jr. JL, Jensen KH, Butts MB (1995) Experimental study of movement and distribution of dense organic contaminants in heterogeneous aquifers. J Contaminant Hydrol 20:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Juanes R (2009) Nonequilibrium effects in models of three-phase flow in porous media. Adv Water Resour 31:661–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Juanes R, Patzek TW (2004) Analytical solution to the Riemann problem of three-phase flow in porous media. Trans Porous Med 55:47–70

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Juanes R, Patzek TW (2004) Relative permeabilities for strictly hyperbolic models of three-phase flow in porous media. Trans Porous Med 57:125–152

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. LaForce T, Johns RT (2005) Analytical solutions for surfactant-enhanced remediation of nonaqueous phase liquids. Water Resour Res 41:W10420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu TP (1974) The Riemann problem for general 2 × 2 conservation laws. Trans Amer Math Soc 199:89–112

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu TP (1975) The Riemann problem for general systems of conservation laws. J Diff Eq 18:218–234

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Carroll DM, Phelan TJ, Abriola LM (2005) Exploring dynamic effects in capillary pressure in multistep outflow experiments. Water Resour Res 41:W11419

    Google Scholar 

  26. Peralta, E (2016) Dakota Access Pipeline protests in North Dakota turn violent. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/04/492625850/dakota-access-pipeline-protests-in-north-dakota-turn-violent. Accessed 12 June 2018

  27. Shearer M (1988) Loss of strict hyperbolicity of the Buckley-Leverett equations for three phase flow in a porous medium. In: Wheeler MF (ed) Numerical Simulation in Oil Recovery, pp. 263–283. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Shearer M, Trangenstein JA (1989) Loss of real characteristics for models of three-phase flow in a porous medium. Trans Porous Med 4:499–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shearer M, Spayd K, Swanson E (2015) Traveling waves for conservation laws with cubic nonlinearity and BBM type dispersion. J Diff Eq 259:3216–3232

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Shearer M, Levy R (2015) Partial Differential Equations: An Introduction to Theory and Applications. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith M, Bosman J (2017) Keystone Pipeline leaks 210,000 gallons of oil in South Dakota. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/us/keystone-pipeline-leaks-south-dakota.html. Accessed 12 June 2018

  32. Spayd K (2018) Generalizing the modified Buckley-Leverett equation with TCAT capillary pressure. Euro J Appl Math 29(2):338–351

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Spayd K, Shearer M (2011) The Buckley-Leverett equation with dynamic capillary pressure. SIAM J Appl Math 71(4):1088–1108

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Stonestrom DA, Akstin KC (1994) Nonmonotonic matric pressure histories during constant flux infiltration into homogeneous profiles. Water Resour Res 30(1): 81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van Duijn CJ, Peletier LA, Pop IS (2007) A new class of entropy solutions of the Buckley-Leverett equation. SIAM J Math Anal 39(2):507–536

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s) and the Association for Women in Mathematics

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Spayd, K., Swanson, E.R. (2019). A Model for Three-Phase Flow in Porous Media with Rate-Dependent Capillary Pressure. In: D'Agostino, S., Bryant, S., Buchmann, A., Guinn, M., Harris, L. (eds) A Celebration of the EDGE Program’s Impact on the Mathematics Community and Beyond . Association for Women in Mathematics Series, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19486-4_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics