Skip to main content

Quantum Modular Forms and Singular Combinatorial Series with Distinct Roots of Unity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Association for Women in Mathematics Series ((AWMS,volume 19))

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between mock modular forms and quantum modular forms is a problem of current interest. Both mock and quantum modular forms exhibit modular-like transformation properties under suitable subgroups of \(\mathrm {SL}_2(\mathbb {Z})\), up to nontrivial error terms; however, their domains (the upper half-plane \(\mathbb {H}\) and the rationals \(\mathbb {Q}\), respectively) are notably different. Quantum modular forms, originally defined by Zagier in 2010, have also been shown to be related to the diverse areas of colored Jones polynomials, meromorphic Jacobi forms, partial theta functions, vertex algebras, and more.

In this paper we study the (n + 1)-variable combinatorial rank generating function R n(x 1, x 2, …, x n;q) for n-marked Durfee symbols. These are n + 1 dimensional multi-sums for n > 1, and specialize to the ordinary two variable partition rank generating function when n = 1. The mock modular properties of R n when viewed as a function of \(\tau \in \mathbb {H}\), with q = e 2πiτ, for various n and fixed parameters x 1, x 2, ⋯ , x n, have been studied in a series of papers. Namely, by Bringmann and Ono when n = 1 and x 1 a root of unity; by Bringmann when n = 2 and x 1 = x 2 = 1; by Bringmann, Garvan, and Mahlburg for n ≥ 2 and x 1 = x 2 = ⋯ = x n = 1; and by the first and third authors for n ≥ 2 and the x j suitable roots of unity (1 ≤ j ≤ n).

The quantum modular properties of R 1 readily follow from existing results. Here, we focus our attention on the case n ≥ 2, and prove for any n ≥ 2 that the combinatorial generating function R n is a quantum modular form when viewed as a function of \(x \in \mathbb {Q}\), where q = e 2πix, and the x j are suitable distinct roots of unity.

Acknowledgements: The authors thank the Banff International Research Station (BIRS) and the Women in Numbers 4 (WIN4) workshop for the opportunity to initiate this collaboration. The first author is grateful for the support of National Science Foundation grant DMS-1449679, and the Simons Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here and throughout, as is standard in this subject for simplicity’s sake, we may slightly abuse terminology and refer to a function as a modular form or other modular object when in reality it must first be multiplied by a suitable power of q to transform appropriately.

References

  1. G. E. Andrews Partitions, Durfee symbols, and the Atkin-Garvan moments of ranks, Invent. Math. 169 (2007), 37–73.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. A. O. L. Atkin and H. P. F. Swinnerton-Dyer, Some properties of partitions, Proc. London Math. Soc. 66 (1954), 84–106.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Bringmann, On the explicit construction of higher deformations of partition statistics, Duke Math. J., 144 (2008), 195-233.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Bringmann, A. Folsom, K. Ono, and L. Rolen, Harmonic Maass forms and mock modular forms: theory and applications, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 64 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Bringmann, F. Garvan, and K. Mahlburg, Partition statistics and quasiweak Maass forms, Int. Math. Res. Notices, 1 (2009), 63–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Bringmann and K. Ono, Dyson’s ranks and Maass forms, Ann. of Math., 171 (2010), 419-449.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Bringmann and L. Rolen, Radial limits of mock theta functions, Res. Math. Sci. 2 (2015), Art. 17, 18 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Bruiner and J. Funke, On two geometric theta lifts, Duke Math. J. 125 (2004), 45-90.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Choi, S. Lim, and R.C. Rhoades, Mock modular forms and quantum modular forms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), no. 6, 2337–2349.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Dyson, Some guesses in the theory of partitions, Eureka (Cambridge) 8 (1944), 10–15.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Folsom, M-J. Jang, S. Kimport, and H. Swisher, Quantum modular forms and singular combinatorial series with repeated roots of unity, submitted. arXiv:1902.10698 [math.NT].

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Folsom and S. Kimport Mock modular forms and singular combinatorial series, Acta Arith. 159 (2013), 257–297.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Folsom, K. Ono, and R.C. Rhoades, Mock theta functions and quantum modular forms, Forum Math. Pi 1 (2013), e2, 27 pp.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. M. I. Knopp, Modular functions in analytic number theory, Markham Publishing Co., Chicago, Ill., 1970.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Lawrence and D. Zagier, Modular forms and quantum invariants of 3-manifolds, Asian J. Math. 3 (1) (1999) 93–107.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Ono, Unearthing the visions of a master: harmonic Maass forms and number theory, Current developments in mathematics, (2008), 347-454, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Rademacher, Topics in analytic number theory, Die Grundlehren der math. Wiss., Band 169, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Zagier, Ramanujan’s mock theta functions and their applications (after Zwegers and Ono-Bringmann), Séminaire Bourbaki Vol. 2007/2008, Astérisque 326 (2009), Exp. No. 986, vii-viii, 143-164 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Zagier, Quantum modular forms, Quanta of maths, 659-675, Clay Math. Proc., 11, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Zwegers, Mock theta functions, Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Zwegers, Multivariable Appell functions and nonholomorphic Jacobi forms, Res. Math. Sci. 6 (2019), 16.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holly Swisher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s) and The Association for Women in Mathematics

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Folsom, A., Jang, MJ., Kimport, S., Swisher, H. (2019). Quantum Modular Forms and Singular Combinatorial Series with Distinct Roots of Unity. In: Balakrishnan, J., Folsom, A., Lalín, M., Manes, M. (eds) Research Directions in Number Theory. Association for Women in Mathematics Series, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19478-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics