Abstract
Major, minor and background characters are prominently disabled throughout the Mad Max series seemingly for a variety of narrative and atmospheric purposes. However, importantly, these characters are never represented as DIS-abled—their visible, physical impairments do not prevent them from functioning productively in the futuristic world, nor are they ridiculed or otherwise marginalised by their community. In fact, many have highly specialised capacities that are crucial to a post-apocalyptic world. Further, perhaps due to the prevalence of disability throughout the Mad Max films, characters’ impairments are rarely mentioned as part of the overall narrative. This is particularly noticeable as the world descends further into (post-)apocalypse and increasing numbers of impaired bodies populate and attempt to rebuild it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barbour, D. H. (1999). Heroism and redemption in the Mad Max trilogy. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 27(3), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956059909602806
Berger, J. (2004). Trauma without disability, disability without trauma: A disciplinary divide. JAC, 24(3), 563–582.
Billson, A. (2015). George Miller talks about Mad Max, heroes & Tina Turner: The 1985 interview. Retrieved from https://multiglom.com/2015/05/12/george-miller-the-1985-interview/
Blowen, M. (1985). Mad Max creator has a point to make. Boston Globe (p. 29). Boston, MA.
Bogdan, R. (2012). Picturing disability: Beggar, freak, citizen and other photographic rhetoric. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Casper, M. J., & Morrison, D. R. (2012). Intersections of disability studies and critical trauma studies: A provocation. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v32i2.3189
Finkelstein, V. (1980). Attitudes and disabled people: Issues for discussion. Disability Archive UK. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/finkelstein/attitudes.pdf
Fletcher, B., & Primack, A. J. (2017). Driving toward disability rhetorics: Narrative, crip theory, and eco-ability in Mad Max: Fury Road. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(4), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2017.1329540
Gagnon, J. M. (2016). Lessons in suffering: Greek tragedy’s teachings on disability through Sophocles’ Philoctetes. New Political Science, 38(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2016.1189029
Garland-Thomson, R. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Garland-Thomson, R. (2015, April 30). Eugenic world building and the problem of disability. RN Big Ideas. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/bigideas/disability-and-bioethics/6427260
Hassler-Forest, D. (2017). Mad Max: Between apocalypse and utopia. Science Fiction Film and Television, 10(3), 301–443. https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2017.21
Johnson, J. K. (2008). The visualization of the twisted tongue: Portrayals of stuttering in film, television, and comic books. Journal of Popular Culture, 41(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2008.00501.x
Kumari Campbell, F. (2009). Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kuppers, P. (2008). Encountering paralysis: Disability, trauma and narrative. In E. A. Kaplan & B. Wang (Eds.), Trauma and cinema: Cross-cultural explorations. Aberdeen & Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Longmore, P. (1987). Screening stereotypes: Images of disabled people in television and motion pictures. In A. Gartner & T. Joe (Eds.), Images of the disabled, disabling images (pp. 65–78). New York, NY: Praeger.
Mathews, S. (1984). 35mm dreams. Ringwood, VIC: Penguin.
McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York, NY; London, UK: New York University Press.
Miller, G., Sexton, M., Lathouris, N., Jones, T., & Burchielli, R. (2015). A prelude to the blockbuster film Mad Max: Fury Road. DC Comics.
O’Regan, T. (2005). Australian national cinema. London, UK; New York, NY: Routledge.
Quayson, A. (2007). Aesthetic nervousness: Disability and the crisis of representation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Rodriguez, R. (2015). Interview: Director George Miller on Mad Max: Fury Road. Retrieved from https://www.star-telegram.com/entertainment/arts-culture/article20797569.html
Rosen, L. (2015, November 19). The plan was for Furiosa to be an amputee, and Charlize Theron made sure they stuck to the plan. LA Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/la-en-charlize-theron-20151119-story.html
Siebers, T. (2010). Disability aesthetics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Siebers, T. (2013). Disability and the theory of complex embodiment – For identity politics in a new register. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (4th ed., pp. 278–296). Hoboken, NJ: Routledge.
Traverso, A., & Broderick, M. (2010). Interrogating trauma: Towards a critical trauma studies. Continuum, 24(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310903461270
Wiesel, I., & Bigby, C. (2015). Movement on shifting sands: Deinstitutionalisation and people with intellectual disability in Australia, 1974–2014. Urban Policy and Research, 33(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2014.980902
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Broderick, M., Ellis, K. (2019). Disability. In: Trauma and Disability in Mad Max. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19439-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19439-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19438-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19439-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)