Abstract
Smart governance has been increasingly gaining momentum to deal with the challenges of fast urbanization in China . However, only limited English literature is available to enhance our understanding of Chinese smart governance . In this chapter, special emphasis is put on our transformative understanding of smart governance in China by identifying the impacts of urban context on smart governance arrangements from an urban planning perspective. As such, we concentrate on smart governance projects in different Chinese cities , foremost based on Chinese literature. We aim to investigate: (1) what smart governance means in Chinese urban planning settings, and (2) how urban context influences the smart governance projects in different Chinese cities . On the basis of an intensive review of Chinese literature on smart governance , we find that smart governance in China varies significantly. Therein, we can identify four types of smart governance in China , including: (1) constructing a pilot area, (2) improving government performance, (3) building trust in government, and (4) encouraging innovation . A comparative exploration of four Chinese projects representing these four types of smart governance shows that the urban context affects the interaction between technology and urban actors. Moreover, it shows that this interaction has a feedback effect on the urban context itself. From this we can conclude that knowledge on the urban context is vital to understand the expected outcomes of intended smart governance arrangements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anttiroiko A (2016) City-as-a-platform: towards citizen-centre platform governance. In: Proceedings of the RSA winter conference
Batty M, Axhausen KW, Giannotti F, Pozdnoukhov A, Bazzani A, Wachowicz M, Ouzounis G, Portugali Y (2012) Smart cities of the future. Eur Phys J Spec Top 214(1):481–518
Bertot JC, Jaeger PT, Grimes JM (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Gov Inf Q 27(3):264–271
BolÃvar MPR, Meijer AJ (2016) Smart governance: using a literature review and empirical analysis to build a research model. Soc Sci Comput Rev 34(6):673–692
Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P (2011) Smart cities in Europe. J Urban Technol 18(2):65–82
Dameri RP, Cocchia A (2013, Dec) Smart city and digital city: twenty years of terminology evolution. In: X Conference of the Italian chapter of AIS, ITAIS, pp 1–8
Giffinger R, Fertner C, Kramar H, Meijers E (2007) City-ranking of European medium-sized cities. Cent Reg Sci Vienna UT, 1–12
Gil-Garcia JR (2012) Enacting electronic government success: an integrative study of government-wide websites, organizational capabilities, and institutions, vol 31. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
Hammad R, Ludlow D (2016, Dec) Towards a smart learning environment for smart city governance. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on utility and cloud computing, ACM, pp 185–190
Hao L, Lei X, Yan Z, ChunLi Y (2012, June) The application and implementation research of smart city in China. In: 2012 international conference on system science and engineering (ICSSE), IEEE, pp 288–292
Janowski T (2015) Digital government evolution: from transformation to contextualization. Gov Inf Q 32(3):221–236
Jia L, Li Z (2017) Social governance in the process of smart city construction: a case study of Shenyang. J Northeast Univ 19(6):608–615
Johnston EW, Hansen DL (2011) Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures. In: Transforming American governance: rebooting the public square, pp 197–212
Kalathil S, Boas TC (2010) Open networks, closed regimes: the impact of the internet on authoritarian rule. Carnegie Endowment
Kleinhans R, Van Ham M, Evans-Cowley J (2015) Using social media and mobile technologies to foster engagement and self-organization in participatory urban planning and neighbourhood governance
Kourtit K, Nijkamp P, Arribas D (2012) Smart cities in perspective—a comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 25(2):229–246
Lin Y (2018) A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: the application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration. In: Telecommunications policy
Linders D (2012) From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov Inf Q 29(4):446–454
Meijer A (2016) Smart city governance: a local emergent perspective. In: Smarter as the new urban agenda. Springer, Cham, pp 73–85
Meijer AJ, Gil-Garcia JR, BolÃvar MPR (2016) Smart city research: contextual conditions, governance models, and public value assessment. Soc Sci Comput Rev 34(6):647–656
Meijer A, Bolivar M (2013, Sept) Governing the smart city: scaling-up the search for socio-techno synergy. In: 2013 EGPA conference proceedings
Meijer A, BolÃvar MPR (2016) Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. Int Rev Admin Sci 82(2):392–408
Nielsen JA, Pedersen K (2014) IT portfolio decision-making in local governments: rationality, politics, intuition and coincidences. Gov Inf Q 31(3):411–420
Ruhlandt RWS (2018) The governance of smart cities: a systematic literature review. Cities 81:1–23
Scholl HJ, AlAwadhi S (2016) Smart governance as key to multi-jurisdictional smart city initiatives: the case of the eCityGov alliance. Soc Sci Inf 55(2):255–277
Shi Y (2018) The model of smart governance of Lujiazui community in Shanghai. In: Lin YL, Wang SF, Geertman S, Deng ZH (eds) Smart governance and new forms of collaborative planning. The Commercial Press, Beijing (in press)
Tofthagen R, Fagerstrøm LM (2010) Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis—a valid method for developing knowledge in nursing science. Scand J Caring Sci 24:21–31
Treib O, Bähr H, Falkner G (2007) Modes of governance: towards a conceptual clarification. J Eur Public Policy 14(1):1–20
United Nations (2018) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision
Wang J (2014) Smart city governance to integrate ICT, government functions, and sociality: an analysis of Hangzhou Shangcheng smart community [in Chinese]. Observation Ponderation 7:50–54
Wang D (2015) Case analysis of smart community: characteristics and contents of smart changyang [in Chinese]. Geomatics World 22(4):34–38
Wang D, Cui S, Yao X, Chi T (2017) Practice and research on intelligent information platform of eco-city construction based on integration with sky, space and earth [in Chinese]. Geomatics World 4:19–23
Yang K (2003) Neoinstitutionalism and e-government: beyond Jane Fountain. Soc Sci Comput Rev 21(4):432–442
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jiang, H., Geertman, S., Witte, P. (2019). Comparing Smart Governance Projects in China: A Contextual Approach. In: Geertman, S., Zhan, Q., Allan, A., Pettit, C. (eds) Computational Urban Planning and Management for Smart Cities. CUPUM 2019. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19424-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19424-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19423-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19424-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)