Skip to main content

Comparing Smart Governance Projects in China: A Contextual Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Urban Planning and Management for Smart Cities (CUPUM 2019)

Abstract

Smart governance has been increasingly gaining momentum to deal with the challenges of fast urbanization in China . However, only limited English literature is available to enhance our understanding of Chinese smart governance . In this chapter, special emphasis is put on our transformative understanding of smart governance in China by identifying the impacts of urban context on smart governance arrangements from an urban planning perspective. As such, we concentrate on smart governance projects in different Chinese cities , foremost based on Chinese literature. We aim to investigate: (1) what smart governance means in Chinese urban planning settings, and (2) how urban context influences the smart governance projects in different Chinese cities . On the basis of an intensive review of Chinese literature on smart governance , we find that smart governance in China varies significantly. Therein, we can identify four types of smart governance in China , including: (1) constructing a pilot area, (2) improving government performance, (3) building trust in government, and (4) encouraging innovation . A comparative exploration of four Chinese projects representing these four types of smart governance shows that the urban context affects the interaction between technology and urban actors. Moreover, it shows that this interaction has a feedback effect on the urban context itself. From this we can conclude that knowledge on the urban context is vital to understand the expected outcomes of intended smart governance arrangements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-02/20/c_136987058.htm.

  2. 2.

    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180821005297/en/Ping-Showcases-Innovative-Solutions-Cities-China-Smart.

  3. 3.

    http://gb.oversea.cnki.net/kns55/support/gb/products.aspx.

References

  • Anttiroiko A (2016) City-as-a-platform: towards citizen-centre platform governance. In: Proceedings of the RSA winter conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M, Axhausen KW, Giannotti F, Pozdnoukhov A, Bazzani A, Wachowicz M, Ouzounis G, Portugali Y (2012) Smart cities of the future. Eur Phys J Spec Top 214(1):481–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertot JC, Jaeger PT, Grimes JM (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Gov Inf Q 27(3):264–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolívar MPR, Meijer AJ (2016) Smart governance: using a literature review and empirical analysis to build a research model. Soc Sci Comput Rev 34(6):673–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P (2011) Smart cities in Europe. J Urban Technol 18(2):65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dameri RP, Cocchia A (2013, Dec) Smart city and digital city: twenty years of terminology evolution. In: X Conference of the Italian chapter of AIS, ITAIS, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Giffinger R, Fertner C, Kramar H, Meijers E (2007) City-ranking of European medium-sized cities. Cent Reg Sci Vienna UT, 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Garcia JR (2012) Enacting electronic government success: an integrative study of government-wide websites, organizational capabilities, and institutions, vol 31. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammad R, Ludlow D (2016, Dec) Towards a smart learning environment for smart city governance. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on utility and cloud computing, ACM, pp 185–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao L, Lei X, Yan Z, ChunLi Y (2012, June) The application and implementation research of smart city in China. In: 2012 international conference on system science and engineering (ICSSE), IEEE, pp 288–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowski T (2015) Digital government evolution: from transformation to contextualization. Gov Inf Q 32(3):221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia L, Li Z (2017) Social governance in the process of smart city construction: a case study of Shenyang. J Northeast Univ 19(6):608–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston EW, Hansen DL (2011) Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures. In: Transforming American governance: rebooting the public square, pp 197–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalathil S, Boas TC (2010) Open networks, closed regimes: the impact of the internet on authoritarian rule. Carnegie Endowment

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhans R, Van Ham M, Evans-Cowley J (2015) Using social media and mobile technologies to foster engagement and self-organization in participatory urban planning and neighbourhood governance

    Google Scholar 

  • Kourtit K, Nijkamp P, Arribas D (2012) Smart cities in perspective—a comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 25(2):229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y (2018) A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: the application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration. In: Telecommunications policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Linders D (2012) From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov Inf Q 29(4):446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer A (2016) Smart city governance: a local emergent perspective. In: Smarter as the new urban agenda. Springer, Cham, pp 73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer AJ, Gil-Garcia JR, Bolívar MPR (2016) Smart city research: contextual conditions, governance models, and public value assessment. Soc Sci Comput Rev 34(6):647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer A, Bolivar M (2013, Sept) Governing the smart city: scaling-up the search for socio-techno synergy. In: 2013 EGPA conference proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer A, Bolívar MPR (2016) Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. Int Rev Admin Sci 82(2):392–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JA, Pedersen K (2014) IT portfolio decision-making in local governments: rationality, politics, intuition and coincidences. Gov Inf Q 31(3):411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhlandt RWS (2018) The governance of smart cities: a systematic literature review. Cities 81:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl HJ, AlAwadhi S (2016) Smart governance as key to multi-jurisdictional smart city initiatives: the case of the eCityGov alliance. Soc Sci Inf 55(2):255–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y (2018) The model of smart governance of Lujiazui community in Shanghai. In: Lin YL, Wang SF, Geertman S, Deng ZH (eds) Smart governance and new forms of collaborative planning. The Commercial Press, Beijing (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tofthagen R, Fagerstrøm LM (2010) Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis—a valid method for developing knowledge in nursing science. Scand J Caring Sci 24:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treib O, Bähr H, Falkner G (2007) Modes of governance: towards a conceptual clarification. J Eur Public Policy 14(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2018) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2014) Smart city governance to integrate ICT, government functions, and sociality: an analysis of Hangzhou Shangcheng smart community [in Chinese]. Observation Ponderation 7:50–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D (2015) Case analysis of smart community: characteristics and contents of smart changyang [in Chinese]. Geomatics World 22(4):34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Cui S, Yao X, Chi T (2017) Practice and research on intelligent information platform of eco-city construction based on integration with sky, space and earth [in Chinese]. Geomatics World 4:19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang K (2003) Neoinstitutionalism and e-government: beyond Jane Fountain. Soc Sci Comput Rev 21(4):432–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaxiong Jiang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jiang, H., Geertman, S., Witte, P. (2019). Comparing Smart Governance Projects in China: A Contextual Approach. In: Geertman, S., Zhan, Q., Allan, A., Pettit, C. (eds) Computational Urban Planning and Management for Smart Cities. CUPUM 2019. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19424-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics