Abstract
In the reporting of the court case, the trial and the public hanging, the news mainly engaged with the invariant civil concern of legitimacy and it was here that the press was at its most undecided and changeable. Ultimately though, it emphasised the legitimacy, fairness and civil nature of English authority, law and justice and rejected the need for any major structural changes. Simultaneously, the news reporting undermined the efforts of the detectives by engaging in its own speculation about the case, condemning the defendant as the murderer before his trial. In its fragmentary and confusing coverage, the press protected existing inequalities and did not meaningfully scrutinise the biases in the processes of authority, law and justice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Alexander, J. (2006). The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buchanan, A. (2002). Political Legitimacy and Democracy. Ethics, 112(4), 689–719.
Chibnall, S. (1981). Chronicles of the Gallows: The Social History of Crime Reporting. The Sociological Review, 29(1), 179–217.
Colquhoun, K. (2012). Mr. Briggs’ Hat: A Sensational Account of Britain’s First Railway Murder. London: Little, Brown Book Group.
Crossley, J. G., & Harrison, J. (2013). The Mediation of the Distinction of “Religion” and “Politics” by the UK Press on the Occasion of Pope Benedict XVI’s State Visit to the UK. Political Theology, 16(4), 329–345.
Crossley, J. G., & Harrison, J. (2015). Atheism, Christianity and the British Press: Press Coverage of Pope Benedict XVI’s 2010 State Visit to the UK. Implicit Religion, 18(1), 77–105.
Dodd, M., & Hanna, M. (2012). McNae’s Essential Law for Journalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hampton, J. (1998). Political Philosophy. Boulder: Westview Press.
Hawthorn, G. (2005). Thucydides on Politics: Back to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Locke, J. (1967 [1690]). Two Treaties of Government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peter, F. (2017). Political Legitimacy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/legitimacy/.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1995). Reply to Habermas. The Journal of Philosophy, 92(3), 132–180.
Ryan, A. (2012). The Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Weber, M. (2013 [1968]). Economy and Society, Vol. 2. (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
Williams, B. (2005). In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harrison, J. (2019). The Reporting of the Murder and the Invariant Civil Concern of Legitimacy. In: The Civil Power of the News. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19381-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19381-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19380-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19381-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)