Abstract
This chapter returns to the toolbox analogy for methods in CDS and draws conclusions for triangulation from the methodological chapters and cases studies. It also reflects on the neglected twin-effect of methodological plurality and triangulation, i.e. the decentering of the research account and deferral of closure. If there is always a next method, another aspect of discourse, and another perspective to contribute, we do not simply expand or support our results by combining methods, we also open up the research process in a way that invites critique and participation—two Open Science goals that CDS should find easy to embrace.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Bryman, Alan. 2006. “Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How Is It Done?” Qualitative Research 6 (1): 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rheindorf, M. (2019). Concluding Remarks. In: Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19369-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19369-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19368-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19369-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)