Advertisement

Arts-Based Activities and Stories Convey Children’s Learning Experiences

  • Juli-Anna AerilaEmail author
  • Marja-Leena Rönkkö
  • Satu Grönman
Chapter
Part of the Educating the Young Child book series (EDYC, volume 16)

Abstract

Arts-based approaches can enhance understanding among all children in the group as well as the educators and can further develop children’s thinking while making learning more child-centered. Incorporating arts-based tasks with stories is both enjoyable and effective for all children. In different arts-based and holistic learning processes, stories can be used in several phases and several purposes. In this chapter, we present a holistic learning intervention, where stories are told to children to visualize the learning contents and to support memorizing and connecting them to children’s prior experiences. In the intervention to a historic house museum environment, children also create their own stories for many purposes: to reflect and convey their learning experiences and to create ideas for arts-based products. The intervention described in the chapter is implemented with a group of Finnish preschoolers and the aim is to highlight how stories could be used effectively for learning different content areas and supporting the development of different skills. In the intervention, stories are used as an arts-based activity and in connection to making a craft. The analysis of this intervention shows how the stories created by the children contain information of the learning content, children’s everyday life and experiences arisen during the visit to the museum environment.

Keywords

Arts-based education Individual story ending ISE Crafts 

References

  1. Aebli, H. (1991). Oppimisen perusmuodot [The forms of learning.] Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar
  2. Aerila, J.-A. (2010). Fiktiivisen kirjallisuuden maailmasta monikulttuuriseen Suomeen. Ennakointikertomus kirjallisuudenopetuksen ja monikulttuurisuuskasvatuksen välineenä [From the world of fictional literature into multi-cultural Finland: The anticipatory story as an educational tool in teaching of literature and multiculturalism]. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
  3. Aerila, J.-A., & Rönkkö, M.-L. (2015a). Enjoy and interpret picturebooks in a child-centred way. The Reading Teacher, 68(5), 349–356.  https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aerila, J.-A., & Rönkkö, M.-L. (2015b). Integrating literature with craft in a learning process with creative elements. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(2), 89–98.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0626-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aerila, J.-A., Rönkkö, M.-L., & Grönman, S. (2016a). Almost like us – Getting familiar with another historical period in a pre-school group. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aerila, J.-A., Rönkkö, M.-L., & Grönman, S. (2016b). Field trip to a historic house museum with preschoolers: Stories and crafts as tools for cultural heritage education. Visitor Studies, 19(2), 144–155.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2016.1220187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Appleton, J., Christenson, S., & Furlong, M. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arts and cultural education at school in Europe. (2009). Brussels: European Commission. Education, Audiovisual & Culture Executive Agency (EACEA P9 Eurydice). Retrieved on June 5, 2017, from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/113EN.pdf
  9. Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691–710.Google Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drew, W. F., & Rankin, B. (2004). Promoting creativity for life using open-ended materials. Young Children, 59(4), 38–44.Google Scholar
  12. Eckert, C., & Stacey, M. (2000). Sources of inspiration: A language of design. Design Studies, 21(5), 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Efland, A. D. (2002). Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press & Reston.Google Scholar
  14. Englebright Fox, J., & Schirrmacher, R. (2014). Art and creative development for young children. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  15. Essa, E. L. (2008). Introduction to early childhood education. New York: Thomson.Google Scholar
  16. FECD. (2016). The curriculum for early childhood education. Helsinki: National Board of Education.Google Scholar
  17. Fox, J. E., & Schirrmacher, R. (2012). Art & creative development for young children. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  18. Glass, D., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2013). Universal design for learning and the arts. Harvard Educational Review, 83(1), 98–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grossman, P. (2001). Research on the teaching of literature: Finding a place. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 416–432). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  20. Harsin, A. (2012). Student reading motivation and student choice/self-selection of reading materials. Proquest: UMI Dissertation Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Heilä-Ylikallio, R., & Oker-Blom, G. (2006). Språkraketen [Language rocket]. Helsinki: The National Board of Education.Google Scholar
  22. Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2013). Design thinking in elementary students’ collaborative lamp designing process. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 18(1), 30–43.Google Scholar
  24. Karppinen, S. (2008). Craft-art as a basis for human activity. International Journal of Art & Design Education 27(1), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klein, J., & Stuart, E. (2013). Using art to teach reading comprehension strategies. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Laamanen, T. K. (2016). Generating and transforming representations in design ideation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  27. Laamanen, T. K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2014). Constraining an open-ended design task by interpreting sources of inspiration. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 14(2), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawrence, R. L. (2008). Powerful feelings. Exploring the affective domain of informal and arts-based learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 120, 65–77.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think? The design process demystified (4th ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Lepistö, J., & Lindfors, E. (2015). From gender-segregated subjects to multi-material craft: Craft student teachers’ views on the future of the craft subject. Formakademisk, 8(4), 1–20.Google Scholar
  32. Linna, H. (1994). Kirjoittamisen suuri seikkailu [Making writing an adventure]. Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar
  33. Lukens, R. J. (2007). A critical handbook of children’s literature (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  34. Mäkitalo, A. (2012). Kirsti of Old Rauma. Lohja: Kiinnoste.Google Scholar
  35. Malin, H. (2013). Making meaningful: Intention in children’s art making. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(1), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mason, R. (2005). The meaning and value of craft. In R. Hickman (Ed.), Art education 11-18: Meaning, purpose and direction (2nd ed., pp. 124–142). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  37. McClure, M., Tarr, P., Thompson, C. M., & Eckhoff, A. (2017). Defining quality in visual art education for young children: Building on the position statement of the early childhood art educator. Arts Education Policy Review, 118(3), 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McNicol, E. (2017). Storytelling and creative learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Storytelling Forum.Google Scholar
  39. Molloy, G. (2007). När pojkar läser och skriver [When boys read and write]. Stockholm: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  40. Pino-James, N. (2015). Golden rules for engaging students in learning activities. Retrieved on 28th December, 2018, from https://www.edutopia.org
  41. Pöllänen, S. (2009). Contextualising craft: Pedagogical models for craft education. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28(3), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards, R. (1996). Beyond Piaget: Accepting divergent, chaotic, and creative thought. New Directions for Child Development, (72), 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rönkkö, M.-L. (2011). Käsityön monet merkitykset. Opettajankoulutuksen opiskelijoiden käsityölle antamat merkitykset ja niiden huomioon ottaminen käsityön opetuksessa [Craft has many meanings. The meanings of craft perceived by the students in teacher education and how they are taken into account in craft teaching]. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
  44. Rönkkö, M.-L., & Aerila, J.-A. (2013). Semiotic working process as a basis for children’s craft process. An experiment in Finnish pre-school group. In U. Härkönen (Ed.), Reorientation of teacher education towards sustainability through theory and practice. Proceedings of the 10th international JTEFS/BBCC conference sustainable development, culture, education (pp. 291–306). Savonlinna: University of Eastern Finland.Google Scholar
  45. Rönkkö, M.-L., & Aerila, J.-A. (2015). Children designing a soft toy: An LCE model as an application of the experiential learning during the holistic craft process. Techne Series: Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 22(1), 44–58.Google Scholar
  46. Rönkkö, M.-L., & Aerila, J.-A. (2018). Humour in a holistic learning process in a preschool setting. Unique soft toys and stories inspired and further developed by children’s sense of humour. FormAkademisk, 11(1), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1858.Google Scholar
  47. Rönkkö, M.-L., & Lepistö, J. (2015). The craft process developing student decision making. Techne Series: Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 23(1), 48–61.Google Scholar
  48. Rönkkö, M.-L., Aerila, J.-A., & Grönman, S. (2016a). Creative inspiration for preschoolers from museums. International Journal of Early Childhood, 48(1), 17–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-016-0159-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rönkkö, M.-L., Mommo, S., & Aerila, J.-A. (2016b). The teachers’ views on the significance of the design in craft teaching in Finland. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 21(2), 49–58.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sawyer, R. K. (2010). Learning for creativity. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 172–190). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schank, R. C. (2002). Tell me a story. Narrative and intelligence. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2000). The weaving design process as a dual-space search. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Home Economics and Craft Science. Research Report 6.Google Scholar
  54. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Huotilainen, M., Mäkelä, M., Groth, C., & Hakkarainen, K. (2016). How can neuroscience help understand design and craft activity? The promise of cognitive neuroscience in design studies. FormAkademisk, 9(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shawn, C. (2016). Putting stories to work. Mastering business storytelling. Melbourne: Pepperberg Press.Google Scholar
  56. Welch, M., & Lim, H. S. (1999). Teaching sketching and its effect on the solutions produced by novice designers. In IDATER 1999 Conference. Institutional repository. Loughborough: Loughborough University.Google Scholar
  57. Whalen, C. (2002). Meeting the diverse needs of children through storytelling. Young Children, 41(3), 31–34.Google Scholar
  58. Winner, E. (2001). The relationship between arts and academic achievement: No evidence (yet) for a causal relationship. In E. Winner & L. Hetland (Eds.), Beyond the soundbite: Arts education and academic outcomes (pp. 17–31). Los Angeles: The Getty Center.Google Scholar
  59. Yliverronen, V., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2016). Learning craft skills: Exploring preschoolers’ craft-making process. Techne Series: Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 23(2), 1–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juli-Anna Aerila
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marja-Leena Rönkkö
    • 1
  • Satu Grönman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TurkuRaumaFinland

Personalised recommendations