Abstract
The “New Science” of Galileo, Kepler, Harvey, Descartes, Boyle, Steno, etc., and the Baroque in visual arts and literature, are two conspicuous aspects of 17th-century European elite culture. If standard historiography of science can be relied upon, the former of the two was not affected by the latter. The lecture asks whether this is a “fact of history” or an artefact of historiography. A delimitation of the “Baroque” going beyond the commonplaces of overloading and contortion concentrates on the acceptance of ambiguity and the appurtenance to a “representative public sphere”, contrasting with the quest for clarity and the argument-based public sphere of the new science, suggesting that Baroque and New Science were indeed incompatible currents. A close-up looks at Juan Caramuel y Lobkowitz, who was a major Baroque theoretician but also wrote much on mathematics, finding even within his mathematics love for ambiguity. The way his mathematics is spoken about in the Oldenburg correspondence shows that the mainstream of the New Science saw no interest in this.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alsted, Johann Heinrich, 1630. Encyclopaedia. 7 tomis distinctis. Herbornae Nassoviorum.
Barocchi, Paola (ed.), 1978. Scritti d’arte del Cinquecento. 9 vols. Torino: Einaudi.
Brann, Noel L., 1999. Trithemius and Magical Theology: A Chapter in the Controversy over Occult Studies in Early Modern Europe. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Buchwald, Jed Z., & Mordechai Feingold, 2013. Newton and the Origin of Civilization. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Caramuel, Juan, 1635. Steganographiae, nec non claviculae Salominis Germani, Ioannis Trithemii, genuina, facilis dilucidaque declaratio. Köln: Typis Egmondanis.
〚Caramuel, Juan, 1644{a}. Mathesis audax: rationalem, naturalem, supernaturalem, divinamque sapientiam, arithmeticis, geometricis, catoptricis, staticis, catoptricis, astronomicis, musicis, chronicis, et architectonicis fundamentis substruens exponensque. Louvain: Bouvet.〛
Caramuel, Juan, 1663a. Apologema pro antiquissima et universalissima doctrina, de probabilitate. Contra novam, singularem, improbabilemque D. Prosperi Fagnani opiniationem. Lyon: Sumptibus Laurentii Anisson.
Caramuel, Juan, 1663b. Primus Calamus oboculos ponens Metametricam. Romae: Fabius Falconius.
Caramuel, Juan, 1670. Mathesis biceps. Vetus, et nova. 2 vols. Campania: In Officina Episcopali.
Coulianu, Ioan P., 1987. Eros and Magic in the Renaissance. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Daston, Lorraine, 2002. Eine kurze Geschichte der wissenschaftlichen Aufmerksamkeit. München: Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung.
de Loyola, Ignacio, 2007. Ejercicios espirituales. Barcelona: Linkgua.
della Porta, Giovanni Battista, 1591. Magiae naturalis libri viginti. Frankfurt: Wechel.
Donne, John, 1986. Selected Poetry and Prose, ed. T. W. Craik & R. J. Craik. London & New York: Methuen.
Drake, Stillman, & C. D. O’Malley (eds, trans.), 1960. The Controversy of the Comets of 1618. Galileo Galilei, Horatio Grassi, Mario Guiducci, Johann Kepler. Philadelphia: University of Pensylvania Press.
Eamon, William, 1991. “Court, Academy and Printing House: Patronage and Scientific Careers in Late Renaissance Italy”, pp. 25–50 in Bruce T. Moran (ed.), Patronage and Institutions. Science, Technology and Medicine at the European Court, 1500–1750. Rochester, New York: Boydell & Brewer.
Eriksson, Gunnar, 1994. The Atlantic Vision: Olaus Rudbeck and Baroque Science. (Uppsala Studies in History of Science, 19). Canton, Mass.: Science History Publications.
Farrington, Benjamin, 1938. “Prometheus Bound: Government and Science in Classical Antiquity”. Science and Society 2 (1937–38), 435–447.
Foley Ames, M. G. (ed., trans.), 1994. Otto von Guericke, The New (so-called Magdeburg) Experiments. [Experimenta nova, Amsterdam 1672)]. Dordrecht etc.: Kluwer.
Ginzburg, Carlo, 1976. Il formaggio e i vermi: Il cosmo di un mugnaio del ‘500. Torino: Einaudi.
Grande dizionario Garzanti della lingua italiana. Milano: Garzanti, 1987.
Hacking, Ian, 1975. The Emergence of Probability. London: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, A. Rupert, & Marie Boas Hall (eds, trans.), 1965. The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg. 13 vols. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press (I–IX) / London: Mansell (X–XI) / London & Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis (XII–XIII), 1965–1986.
Hauser, Arnold, 1965. Il Manierismo. La crisi del Rinascimento e l’origine dell’arte moderna. 2Torino: Einaudi.
Hofmann, Joseph Ehrenfried, 1953, Geschichte der Mathematik. 3 Bände. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1953–1957.
Hooykaas, R., 1958. Humanisme, science et réforme: Pierre de la Ramée (1515–1572). Leiden: Brill.
Hotson, Howard, 2007. Commonplace Learning: Ramism and its German Ramifications, 1543–1630. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Høyrup, Jens, 1984. “Erkendelsesteoretiske, historiske og andre bemærkninger til offentlighedsbegrebet”. Filosofi og Videnskabsteori på Roskilde Universitetscenter 4, 136–168.
Høyrup, Jens, 1997a.“Barocco e scienza secentesca: un legame inesistente?” Analecta Romana Instituti Danici 25 (1997), 141–172.
Høyrup, Jens, 1997b. “Reflections on the Baroque in the History of Science”. Essay Review of Gunnar Eriksson, The Atlantic Vision: Olaus Rudbeck and Baroque Science. Physis 24 (1997), 675–694.
Høyrup, Jens, 2004. “From Hesiod to Saussure, from Hippocrates to Jevons. An Introduction to the History of Scientific Thought”. Eighth, still preliminary version. Lecture notes, Roskilde Universitetscenter, Faggruppen for Filosofi og Videnskabsteori.
Ineichen, Robert, 2008. “Leibniz, Caramuel, Harriot und das Dualsystem”. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 16:1, 12–15.
Josten, C. H., 1964. “A Translation of John Dee’s ‘Monas hieroglyphica’ (Antwerp, 1564), with an Introduction and Annotations [and a facsimile of the Latin text]”. Ambix 12, 84–221.
Koch, Ludovica, 1983. “Rime, arditezze e ragioni”, pp. 169–194 in Etimologia: Pratiche e invenzioni (Fabrica 1. Quaderni di retorica e di euristica letteraria). Napoli: Istituto Universitario Orientale.
Koch, Ludovica, 1994. “Écho, sa raison et ses rimes”, pp. 89–96 in Inge Degn, Jens Høyrup & Jan Scheel (eds), Michelanea. Humanisme, litteratur og kommunikation. Festskrift til Michel Olsen i anledning af hans 60-årsdag den 23. april 1994. Aalborg: Center for Sprog og Interkulturelle Studier, Aalborg Universitetscenter.
Krafft, Fritz, 1972. “Guericke, Otto von”, pp. 574–576 in Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. V. New York: Scribner.
Littré, Émile, 1873. Dictionnaire de la langue française. 4 vols. + suppl. Paris: Hachette, 1873–1877.
Long, Pamela, 1991. “The Openness of Knowledge: An Ideal and Its Context in 16th-Century Writings on Mining and Metallurgy”. Technology and Culture 32, 318–355.
Lüthy, Christoph, 2006. “Where Logical Necessity Becomes Visual Persuasion: Descartes’s Clear and Distinct Illustrations”, pp. 97–133 in Sachiko Kusukawa & Ian Maclean (eds), Transmitting Knowledge: Words, Images and Instruments in Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mandelbrote, Scott, 2007. “The Uses of Natural Theology in Seventeenth-Century England”. Science in Context 20, 451–480.
Martínez Gavilán, María Dolores, 2001. “La Grammatica audax de Juan Caramuel y las corrientes lingüisticas del siglo XVII”, pp. 107–133 in E. F. K. Koerner & Hans-Josef Niederehe (eds), The History of Linguistics in Spain II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Middleton, W. E. Knowles, 1971. The Experimenters: A Study of the Accademia del cimento. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Mullan, Elder (ed., trans.), 1914. The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola, translated from the autograph. New York: P. J. Kennedy & Sons.
Newton, Isaac, 1728. La Chronologie des anciens royaumes corrigée, à laquelle on a joint une chronique abrégée, qui contient ce qui c’est passé anciennement en Europe, jusqu’à la conquête de la Perse par Alexandre le Grand. Paris: Gabriel Martin, Jean-Baptiste Coignard, Hippolite Louis Guerin & François Montalant.
Pascal, Blaise, 1954. Oeuvres complètes, ed. Jacques Chevalier. Paris: Gallimard, 1954.
Pérez de Laborda, Alfonso, 2005. Estudios filosóficos de historia de la ciencia. Madrid: Encuentro.
Remmert, Volker R., 2006. “‘Docet parva pictura, quod multae scripturae non dicunt.’ Frontispieces, Their Functions, and Their Audiences in Seventeenth-Century Mathematical Sciences”, pp. 239–270 in Sachiko Kusukawa & Ian Maclean (eds), Transmitting Knowledge: Words, Images and Instruments in Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rodet, Léon, 1881. “Les prétendus problèmes d’algèbre du manuel du calculateur égyptien (Papyrus Rhind)”. Journal asiatique, septième série 18, 184–232, 390–559.
Rudbeck, Olaus, 1679. Atland Eller Manheim. Uppsala: Henricus Curio.
Vernet, Juan, 1971. “Caramuel y Lobkowitz, Juan”, p. 61 in Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. III. New York: Scribner.
Waterworth, J. (ed., trans.), 1848. The Canons and Decrees of the Sacred and Oecumenical Council of Trent. London: Dolman.
Wellek, René, 1973. “Baroque in Literature”, pp. 188–195 in Dictionary of the History of Ideas, vol. I. New York: Scribner.
Wittkower, Rudolf, 1972. Arte e architettura in Italia: 1600–1750. 2Torino: Einaudi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Høyrup, J. (2019). (Article II.15.) Baroque Mind-set and New Science a Dialectic of 17th-Century High Culture Sarton Chair Lecture, Ghent University, 13 November 2008. In: Selected Essays on Pre- and Early Modern Mathematical Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19258-7_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19258-7_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19257-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19258-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)