Skip to main content

Oil Paint Straight from the Tube: Paint-Specific Deterioration in Works by Alexis Mérodack-Jeaneau, 1910–1913

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conservation of Modern Oil Paintings

Abstract

A collection of eight paintings by painter Alexis Mérodack-Jeaneau (1873–1919) was studied for the retrospective exhibition scheduled for 2019 at the Angers musée des Beaux-Arts. Between 1910 and 1913 Mérodack-Jeaneau adopted a novel technique whereby he squeezed paint directly from the tube onto the pre-primed canvas, leaving the surface unvarnished. The paintings were examined and compared to better understand the painter’s palette, tools and work habits. The impastos are deteriorated in a particular manner: loss of adhesion, underbinding, water-sensitivity, deposits and efflorescence, protrusions. Results of scientific analysis (ESEM-EDS, XRF, GC-MS, FTIR) provided evidence to support hypotheses about the processes involved in the alteration phenomena. Crystallization of highly soluble sodium sulfate in ultramarine paint may be one factor contributing to its water-sensitivity. A conservation methodology and strategy was designed to treat the paintings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The project is the continuation of a master thesis in paintings conservation at the Institut national du patrimoine focusing on La Créole au perroquet [13].

  2. 2.

    See [18], pp. 9–33.

  3. 3.

    (Personal translation): “Saisir la vie, noter le mouvement, rendre l’atmosphère. J’essaie de faire des grands tableaux comme mes croquis rapides, avec les simples touches nécessaires de couleur” [20].

  4. 4.

    Indeed, close stylistic links between Mérodack-Jeaneau and van Dongen can be drawn especially when looking at Femme au fond blanc at the Art Institute of Chicago (1910–1914) by van Dongen.

  5. 5.

    This ensemble was separated at an unknown date. The three paintings in the museum’s collection have been called a “triptych” according to their similar formats, but as a painting with a similar subject and format exists in a private collection, this denomination could be incorrect.

  6. 6.

    This type of marks is often observed on the reverse of oil-bound pre-primed canvases of more recent paintings by Pierre Soulages and Georges Mathieu [15] and can be related to a couche grasse added in the oily ground, or to the glue from the sizing (personal discussion with Leslie Carlyle).

  7. 7.

    Generally speaking all the elements of the painting except the background are realized with this technique.

  8. 8.

    Van Gogh appears to be the first artist to use the tube to apply paint ([23]: 30) followed by Kandinsky at the beginning of his career, notably on Landschaft bei Regensburg, (1903) as discussed with Iris Schaefer (Wallraf-Richartz-Museum). Vlaminck discusses the use of the tube to paint in his writings [6, 12] and it was also observed on some of his paintings.

  9. 9.

    Patented in 1841 by the American John G. Rand, the tin-iron-tin laminate collapsible tube was invented precisely to contain paint.

  10. 10.

    (personal translation); “Je crains qu’avec les couleurs de la Maison Lefranc, les mauvais tableaux soient aussi durables que les bons” ([17], np., cited by [25]: 320).

  11. 11.

    Authors mention additives since the middle of the nineteenth century ([7]: 194).

  12. 12.

    “The commercial product forms large, transparent crystals of the monoclinic system, with 55–76% of water of crystallization, readily efflorescing in the air” ([31]: 317).

  13. 13.

    High azelaic acid content was also noted (Mirabaud and Genachte-Le Bail, Inp, report Inp-DR.16–11; [2]).

  14. 14.

    Crystal formation within the paint creates stresses that can alter the binding network of the paint.

  15. 15.

    Artificial ultramarine is prepared by heating china clay with sulphide, soda, carbon, and Glauber’s salt (sodium sulfate), of which it should be free because this may cause efflorescence ([9]: 78, [24]: 55–65).

  16. 16.

    It might also depend on the grade of the ultramarine ([31]: 178).

  17. 17.

    FTIR analysis on varnish samples identified polyvinyl-acetate resin internally plasticized with VeoVA (Nathalie Balcar, C2RMF, reports n°39,018 and n°39,019).

  18. 18.

    Three out of the eight paintings are originally unvarnished.

References

  1. Apollinaire G (1960) Chroniques d’art (1902–1918). Gallimard, Paris, p 350

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banti D, La Nasa J, Lluveras Tenorio A, Modugno F, van den Berg KJ, Lee J, Orsmby B, Burnstock A, Bonaduce I (2018) A molecular study of modern oil paintings: investigating the role of dicarboxylic acids in the water sensitivity of modern oil paints. RSC Adv., 8, pp 6001–6012

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellanger C (1907) Le peintre : traité usuel de peinture à l’usage de tout le monde. Garnier, Paris, p 217–219

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bourgeois Aîné (1913) Catalogue illustré Couleurs fines et matériel d’artistes. Paris, p 152

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burnstock A, van den Berg KJ, Groot S, Hinde L (2007) An Investigation of Water-Sensitive Oil Paints in Twentieth-Century Paintings. In: Learner T, Smithen P, Krueger J, Schilling M (eds) Modern Paints Uncovered. 2006, Getty Publications, Los Angeles, p 178

    Google Scholar 

  6. Campa L (2013) Guillaume Apollinaire. Gallimard, Paris. https://books.google.fr/books?id=jQ9AAQAAQBAJ&pg=PT198&dq=derain+tube+cobalt&hl=fr&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=touches%20mobiles&f=false. Accessed 25 Sept 2018

  7. Carlyle L (2001) The artist’s assistant: oil painting instruction manuals and handbooks in Britain, 1800–1900, with reference to selected eighteenth-century sources. Archetype Publications, London p 194

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cremonesi P (2018) Combination of a liquid-dispensing and micro-aspiration device for the cleaning of sensitive painted surfaces. Studies in Conservation 63, 6, p 315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doerner M (1934) The materials of the artist and their use in painting. Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, p 78

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denecker M (2014) Le rôle des sulfates de sodium dans l’altération des pierres du patrimoine bâti: méthodes indirectes d’identification pour l’approche expérimentale. PhD thesis, Université de Cergy Pontoise, p 51

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dinet E (1926) Les fléaux de la peinture, Moyens de les combattre. Laurens, Paris, pp 48–49

    Google Scholar 

  12. Franck D (2015) Le temps des bohèmes. Grasset, Paris. https://books.google.fr/books?redir_esc=y&hl=fr&id=SDeHCgAAQBAJ&q=%C3%A9crasant+ses+tubes#v=snippet&q=%C3%A9crasant%20ses%20tubes&f=false. Accessed 25 Sept 2018

  13. Graczyk A (2016) A pleins tubes ! Le tube de peinture utilisé comme outil de mise en œuvre dans les années 1910 pour La Créole au perroquet par Alexis Mérodack-Jeaneau (musée des Beaux-Arts, Angers). Postgraduate diploma in the Conservation of easel paintings, Institut national du patrimoine, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hélou-de La Grandière P, Le-Hô AS, Mirambet F (2008) Delaminating paint films at the end of 1950s: a case study on Pierre Soulages. In: Joyce H. Townsend (ed) Preparation for Painting: the artist’s choice and its consequence, ICOM interim meeting on paintings. Archetype Publications, London, pp 156–162

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hélou-de La Grandière P (2018) A Montparnasse disease? Severe Expressions of Metal Soaps in Paintings by Pierre Soulages from around 1959–1960. In: Casadio F, Keune K, Noble P, van Loon A, Hendriks E, Centeno S, Osmond G (eds) Metal Soaps in Art: Conservation and Research. Springer (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lefranc et Compagnie [1910] Catalogue Couleurs fines pour la peinture à l’huile, la gouache, l’aquarelle, le pastel [...]. Paris, p 5

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lefranc (1925) Les peintures et la couleur. Paris, 1925, np.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Le Nouëne P (1997) Alexis Mérodack-Jeaneau dans les collections du musée des Beaux-Arts d’Angers. Musées d’Angers, Angers, pp 9–33

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lopez-Arce P, Doehne E (2006) Kinetics of Sodium Sulfate as observed by humidity cycling with ESEM. In: Heritage, Weathering & Conservation Conference, Madrid 21–24 June, Consejo superior de investigaciones cientificas, Madrid, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mérodack-Jeaneau A (1912) L’Ouest, 2 août 1912, pp 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mills L, Burnstock A, Duarte F, de Groot S, Megens L, Bisschoff M, van Keulen H, and van den Berg KJ (2008) Water sensitivity of modern artists’ oil paints. In: Bridgland J (ed) ICOM Committee for Conservation, 15th triennial conference, New Delhi, 22–26 September 2008: preprints. ICOM Committee for Conservation, Paris, pp 651–659

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ordonez E, Twilley J (1998) Clarifying the haze, efflorescence on works of art. WAAC Newsletter, vol. 20 / 1. https://cool.conservation-us.org/waac/wn/wn20/wn20-1/wn20-108.html. Accessed 27 Sept 2018

  23. Peres C, Hoyle M, van Tilborgh L (1991) A Closer look: technical and art-historical studies on works by Van Gogh and Gauguin. Waanders Publisher, Zwolle, p 30

    Google Scholar 

  24. Plesters J (1968) Ultramarine blue, natural and artificial. In: Roy A, Artists’ Pigments: a Handbook of their history and characteristics. New York, Oxford, pp 55–65

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roth-Meyer C (2004) Les marchands de couleurs à Paris au XIXème siècle. PhD thesis, Université Paris IV, p 320

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sawicka A, Burnstock A, Izzo FC, Keune K, Boon J, Kirsch K, van den Berg KJ (2014) An Investigation into the Viability of Removal of Lead Soap Efflorescence from Contemporary Oil Paintings. In: van den Berg KJ, Burnstock A, Keijzer M, Krueger J, Learner T (eds) Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint. Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp 311–332

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sennelier G (1912) Chimie des couleurs : Fabrique de couleurs fines pour les arts. Paris, p6

    Google Scholar 

  28. Silvester G, Burnstock A, Megens L, Learner T, Chiari G, and van den Berg KJ (2014) A cause of water-sensitivity in modern oil paint films: the formation of magnesium sulphate. Studies in Conservation 59, 1, pp 38–51

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vibert JG (1981) La science de la peinture. Gutenberg reprint, p 97–292

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zehnder K, Schoch O (2009) Efflorescence of mirabilite, epsomite and gypsum traced by automated monitoring on-site. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10, pp 324–326

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zerr G, Rubencamp R (1908) A treatise on colour manufacture: a guide to the preparation, examination, and application of all the pigment colours in practical use. C. Griffin, London, p 178–317

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was realized with the scientific input of Nathalie Balcar (C2RMF), conservation support of Gilles Barabant (C2RMF), and the confidence of Christine Besson (musée des Beaux-Arts, Angers).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agata Graczyk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Experimental Details for Analysis

Appendix: Experimental Details for Analysis

GC-MS performed by Sigrid Mirabaud, Inp, was used for the separation and identification of organic components in the paint layers of samples from La Créole au perroquet. A trace GC Ultra gas chromatograph (Thermo Scientific) and an ISQ Single quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) were used with the following specifications: non-polar fused silica capillary column (Rxi 5Sil MS, 20 m, 0.18 mm di, 0.18 mm df Restek); carrier gas H2 at 1.5 ml/min; temperature program: 50 °C for 1 min, ramp of 20 °C/min until 320 °C, hold 320 °C for 5 min; split injector set at 290 °C with a total flow of 50 mL/min and a split ratio of 15 (except sample P03 which was injected in the splitless mode); automated injection; interface temperature set at 320 °C; electronic impact ionisation mode at 70 eV, ion source temperature 220 °C. The samples required a derivatisation step prior to injection, which included mixing fragments of the samples with 50–100 μL of Meth-Prep II (Grace Alltech) and heating at 60 °C for 30 min prior to injection. This transmethylation is needed to hydrolyse the glyceride and terpenoid components of the binder, and convert the polar groups (acids and alcohols) into the corresponding methyl esters and ethers.

ESEM-EDS performed by [A] Alan Phenix, GCI, and [B] Nathalie Balcar, C2RMF

  1. [A]

    samples from La Créole au perroquet: cross-sections by embedded in acrylic resin Technovit 2000 LC, first examined microscopically using a Leica DM4000 microscope, and analyzed by Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (ESEM-EDS) using a Philips XL30 ESED-FEG instrument with Oxford INCA EDS analysis software. ESEM-EDS conditions: H20 mode, 10 mm working distance, 20 kV accelerating voltage, and 1.0 torr water vapour pressure in the chamber.

  2. [B]

    samples from La Montreuse de singe and L’Écuyère verte: the identification of pigments and degradation products were carried out on samples embedded in polyester resin, after a wet polishing and a carbon coating. The instrument used for elemental analyses was a scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Philips XL30CP) with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS analysis, SDD Oxford S-Max 50); acceleration voltage of 15 kV, software AZTEC.

XRF performed by [A] Anne Genachte-Le Bail, Inp, and [B] Eric Laval, C2RMF

  1. [A]

    In situ analysis on La Créole au perroquet with portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer Bruker ARTAX800 (excitation source: molybdenum, voltage: 50 kV, intensity 600 μA, duration of analysis: 100 s, atmosphere: helium (1 L/min)), number of analysed spots: 21.

  2. [B]

    In situ analysis on L’Écuyère verte [1] and La Montreuse de singe [2] with portable x-ray spectrometer Elio from XGLab (excitation source: transmission X-Ray generator, 5–200 μA, 10–40 kV, Rh anode (Ag, Au, Mo, W)), number of analysed spots: 14 [1], 16 [2].

FTIR spectroscopy performed by Nathalie Balcar, C2RMF

Samples of varnish from La Montreuse de singe and L’Écuyère verte were analyzed with a handheld AGILENT FTIR Exoscan 4100 spectrometer with ATR Diamond (4000-and 650 cm−1 range at a resolution with 8 cm−1 and by summing 32 scans), MicroLab software.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Graczyk, A., Hélou-de La Grandière, P., Phenix, A., Mirabaud, S. (2019). Oil Paint Straight from the Tube: Paint-Specific Deterioration in Works by Alexis Mérodack-Jeaneau, 1910–1913. In: van den Berg, K., et al. Conservation of Modern Oil Paintings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19254-9_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics