Skip to main content

Labeling Theory, The Power of Words, and Implicit Bias

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2396 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on labeling theory (the impact of labels), the power of words, and implicit bias . Trauma -informed approaches compel us to focus on narrative and chose our words wisely. We impact positive change when we build positive environments with positive narrative. Several sociological studies powerfully demonstrate the connection between narrative and self-efficacy and construction of one’s identity. Positive words and reinforcement build confidence and confidence inspires change . Economists will tell you that the market does well when there is confidence in it. If this rationale holds true for markets, how much more so should it, can it be applied to people? All human beings are impressionable, but youth are incredibly impressionable. The objective of this chapter is to raise awareness (and provide tools for recognizing and managing narrative) around the impact and power of words and to challenge individuals (attached to systems) to work toward changing their narrative so that they increase the risk of facilitating the kind of change they seek in youth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alter, A. (2010). Why its dangerous to label people: “Why labeling a person “black”, “rich” or “smart” make it so. In Psychology Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amodio, D. M. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 670–682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benitez-Burraco, A. (2017). How the language we speak affects the way we think. Psychology Today. Retrieved February 2017 from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-biolinguistic-turn/201702/how-the-language-we-speak-affects-the-way-we-think.

  • Bennett, M. W. (2017). The implicit racial bias in sentencing: The next frontier. Yale LJF, 126, 381. www.yalelawjournal.com/forum/the-implicit-racial-bias-in-sentencing.

  • Bernburg, J. G., Krohn, M. D. & Rivera, C. J. (2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research In Crime & Delinquency, 43(1), 67–88 (Academic Search Premier). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427805280068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. S., & Finch-Wero, J. L. (1993). Accuracy in face perception: A view from ecological psychology. Journal of Personality, 61, 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1142–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V., Steiner, J. F., & Havranek, E. P. (2011). Unconscious (implicit) bias and health disparities: Where do we go from here? The Permanente Journal, 15(2), 71–78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Block, P., & Grund, T. (2014). Multidimensional homophily in friendship networks. Network Science, 2(2), 189–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantlinger, E. (1991). Social class distinctions in adolescents’ reports of problems and punishment in school. Behavioral Disorders, 17, 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (Ed.) (1997) [1956]. Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, Mass: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, A. (2018). An overview of labeling theory: Developed in the 1960s and still Widely relevant today. https://www.thoughtco.com/labeling-theory-3026627.

  • Davis, A. (2003). Are prisons obsolete? (p. 84). New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 62–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, J. (2005). Definitions of, and distinctions between, shame and guilt: A facet analysis. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(03), 1537 (UMI No. 3085863).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engell, A. D., et al. (2007). Implicit trustworthiness decisions: automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19:1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1508, PMID: 17714012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epston, D., & White, M. (1995). Consulting your consultants: A means to the co-construction of alternative knowledges. In S. Friedman (Ed.), The reflecting team in action: Collaborative practice in family therapy (pp. 277–313). NewYork: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernesto London. (2017). Rio de Janeiro, ‘Complete Vulnerability’ as violence surges. The New York Times. November 18, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1013–1027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FitzGerald, C., & Hurst, S. (2017). Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC medical ethics, 18(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., et al. (2014). Amygdala responsivity to high-level social information from unseen faces. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(32), 10573–10581. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5063-13.2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. C., Epston, D., & Lobovits, D. (1997). Playful approaches to serious problems: Narrative therapy with children and their families. NewYork: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullagar, S. (2003). Wasted lives the social dynamics of shame and youth suicide. Journal of Sociology, 39(3), 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. J., Swencionis, J. K., & Amodio, D. M. (2012). Evaluative versus trait representation in intergroup social judgments: Distinct roles of anterior temporal lobe and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3600–3611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, Malcolm. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little, Brown And Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, J. (2014). Suspect race: Causes and consequences of racial profiling. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, P. A. et al. (2016). The science of justice: Race, arrests and police use of force. Center for Policing Equity. Retrieved July 2016 from http://policingequity.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/CPE_SoJ_Race-Arrests-UoF_2016-07-08-1130.pdf.

  • Gordon, R., Della Piana, L., & Keleher, T. (2000). Facing the consequences: An examination of racial discrimination in U.S. public schools. Oakland, CA: Applied Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E., Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J. F. (1997). Three strikes and they’re out: African American boys and American schools’responses to misbehavior. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 7(1), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, W. J., et al. (2015). Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 105, e60–e76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Imich, A. J. (1994). Exclusions from school: Current trends and issues. Educational Research, (1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeser, S. C. (1979). Suspensions in school discipline. Education and Urban Society, 11, 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. D. & Johnson, B. D. (2016). A punishing look: Skin tone and afrocentric features in the halls of justice. American journal of Chemical Society, 122, 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, J. (1977). Labeling theory: A critical examination (Rep. No. 3) Stockholm, Sweden: Scientific Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, C., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2010). How do we empathize with someone who is not like us? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 362–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May, M. (2017). Shame! a system psychodynamic perspective. Shame! the value of shame exploring a health resource in cultural contexts, Chap. 2 (pp. 43–59). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. D., & Hoge, D. R. (1987). The social construction of school punishment: Racial disadvantage out of universalistic process. Social Forces, 65, 1101–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., et al. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongold, J., & Edwards, B. (2014). Reintegrative shaming: Theory into practice. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology. 6, 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. P. (1984). Working with shame in psychoanalytic treatment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 32(3), 479–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, D., & Kilday, A. M. (2010). The history and theory of shame—then and now. In Cultures of Shame. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2000). Statement on civil rights implications of zero tolerance programs. Washington, DC: Testimony presented to the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J., Ormseth, T., Bell, R., & Camp, P. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Washington, DC: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. S. (2017). Systemic triage: implicit racial bias in the criminal courtroom. Yale LJ, 126, 862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riezler, K. (1943). Comment on the social psychology of shame. The American Journal of Sociology, 48(4), 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, D.-O. (2010). Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence. Labour Economics, 17, 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1992). Pygmalion in the classroom (Expanded ed.). New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheff, T. J. (1988). Shame and conformity: The deference-emotion system. American Sociological Review, 53(3), 397–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, E. (1998). The prison industrial complex. The Atlantic. Retrieved December 1998 from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1998/12/the-prison-industrial-complex/304669/.

  • Scimecca, J. A. (1977). Labeling theory and personal construct theory: Toward the measurement of individual variation. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 68, 652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. D., Brett-MacLean, P., Archibald, M., & Hartling, L. (2013). Protocol for a systematic review of the use of narrative storytelling and visual-arts-based approaches as knowledge translation tools in healthcare. Systematic Reviews, 2, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., et al. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157–1162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., et al. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439, 466–469.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., Nardo, A. C., et al. (2002). The Urban Review, 34, 317. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021320817372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, I., & Thurner, S. (2017). Formation of homophily in academic performance: Students change their friends rather than performance. PLoS ONE, 12(8), e0183473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C., Spencer, S., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 379–440). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, A., et al. (2011). Task-invariant brain responses to the social value of faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2766–2781. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2011.21616, PMID: 21254805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, A., & Engell, A. D. (2008). The role of the amygdala in implicit evaluation of emotionally neutral faces. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 303–312, https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn033, PMID: 19015082.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Science, 308, 1623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, B. L. (2000). The Disproportionate Discipline of African American Learners: Reducing School Suspensions and Expulsions. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600308

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2008). The neural substrates of in-group bias: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Psychological Science, 11, 1131–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, J. S., et al. (2002). Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn816, PMID: 11850635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alisha Moreland-Capuia .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moreland-Capuia, A. (2019). Labeling Theory, The Power of Words, and Implicit Bias. In: Training for Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19208-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics