Skip to main content

Promoting Enhanced Public Participation and Community Engagement in Policing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Many police organizations in western democracies have experienced reductions in street and violent crime rates over the last two decades. This enhanced effectiveness, which has been observed in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom since the mid-1990s, has been correlated with the increased use of technology and the employment of proactive, arrest-oriented strategies. In many jurisdictions, resources have been transitioned away from highly touted community policing efforts to investigative and enforcement units. While many law enforcement experts and administrators have viewed these initiatives as a ‘smarter’ form of policing, some advocates for predominantly minority neighborhoods have frequently alleged racial and ethnic bias and other abusive conduct at the hands of the police, most notably in larger metropolitan centers. The purpose of this paper will be to examine and identify practical options for direct community and victim engagement after highlighting legislation and practices that have been shown to increase transparency and police legitimacy in some western democracies. The findings of this review will support the need to enhance public and victim involvement in criminal justice processes as emphasized within the ‘left realism’ theory of justice and will examine options for incorporating this theory into practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 2019, the NYPD consisted of approximately 36, 000 police officers and an additional 9000 unarmed traffic enforcement and school safety officers.

  2. 2.

    Quality of life issues included begging, public intoxication, loud noise, street level drug dealing and usage, graffiti, etc.

  3. 3.

    It was noted that front line patrol and community police officers had difficulty in developing lasting solutions to reported problems and crime trends due to their general levels of police inexperience. In addition, it was clearly much easier for the tenured police station commander to re-deploy resources and develop long term strategies than it was for a new police officer to develop effective problem-solving strategies for local crime and disorder complaints.

  4. 4.

    The tri-state area includes New York City and the New York, New Jersey and Connecticut commuter regions.

References

  • Albrecht, J. F. (2012). Analyzing the implementation and evolution of community policing in the United States and Scandinavia. In M. De Guzman, A. M. Das, & D. K. Das (Eds.), Strategic responses to crime: Thinking globally, acting locally. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 196–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canada Department of Justice. (2015). Police discretion with young offenders. Ottawa: Canada Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Victims Bill of Rights, S.C. (2015). c. 13, s. 2. Ottawa: Parliament of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of London Police. (2014). Community policing. London: City of London Police.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R. R. (1992). Community policing. New York: Springer Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York: McGraw Hill Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.R. 5107 – Public Law 108-405. (2004). The justice for all act of 2004. Washington, D.C.: US Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. L. M. (1901). A history of police in England. London: Methuan and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, V. B., Kuhns, J. B., & Friday, P. C. (2009). Small city community policing and citizen satisfaction. Policing, 32(4), 574–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (1992). Replacing ‘broken windows:’ Crime, incivilities and urban change. In R. Matthews & J. Young (Eds.), Issues in realist criminology. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, E. (2007). The new policing. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • New York State Crime Victims Board. (2007). A guide to crime victims compensation in New York state. Albany/New York: New York State Crime Victims Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normandeau, A., & Leighton, B. (1990). A vision of the future of policing in Canada: Police challenge 2000. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U. (2003). Punishment goals of crime victims. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontell, H. N., Black, W. K., & Geis, G. (2014). Too big to fail, too powerful to jail? On the absence of criminal prosecutions after the 2008 financial meltdown. Crime, Law and Social Change, 61(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the President’s task force on 21st century policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinney, R. (1974). Crime and justice in America: A critical understanding. London: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinton, P., & Morris, J. (2008). Neighborhood policing: The impact of piloting and early national implementation. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisig, M. D., & Lloyd, C. (2008). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime: Results from a survey of Jamaican adolescents. Police Quarterly, 12(1), 42–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (2010). The current health of left realist theory. Crime, Law and Sociological Change, 54, 107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M., & Goldstein, H. (2005). Shifting and sharing responsibility for Public safety problems. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping Public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 513–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, J. (1996). Criminology: Theory and context. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trojanowicz, R. C. (1988). The meaning of community in community policing. East Lansing: National Neighborhood Foot Patrol Center, School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Home Office. (2015). 2010–2015 Government policy: Policing. London: United Kingdom Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Ministry of Justice. (2015). Code of practice for victims of crime. London: UK Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Justice COPS Office. (2015). COPS fact sheet: 2015 COPS hiring program. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Justice Office for Victims of Crime. (2006). OVC fact sheet: The justice for all act. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1975). Thinking about crime. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (1992). Realist research as a basis for local criminal justice policy. In J. Lowman & B. MacLean (Eds.), Realist criminology: Crime control and policing in the 1990s. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Albrecht, J.F. (2019). Promoting Enhanced Public Participation and Community Engagement in Policing. In: Albrecht, J.F., den Heyer, G., Stanislas, P. (eds) Policing and Minority Communities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19182-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19182-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19181-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19182-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics