Abstract
The indigenous populations in the United States, Native Americans, have experienced a unique form of governance as their federally assigned lands are designated as sovereign. However, there is direct involvement of federal law enforcement on those lands under many circumstances. In addition, many tribal groups have coordinated their own jurisdictional law enforcement and criminal justice processes, often using traditional laws and tribal practices to remedy disputes between parties, even when issues may reach the criminal level. The history and progress of these developments will be outlined in detail.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Belliveau, J. (1993). Casino gamrbling under the Indian gaming regulatory act: Narragansett tribal sovereignty versus Rhode Island gambling laws. Suffolk University Law Review, 27(2), 389–423.
Carey, G. W., & McClellan, J. (Eds.). (1990). The federalist. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
Christensen, G. (2019). The extraterritorial reach of tribal court criminal jurisdiction. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 46, 294–310.
Dossett, J. H. (2018). Indian country and the territory clause: Washington’s promise at the framing. American University Law Review, 68, 205–280.
Douglas, M. (2018). Sufficiently criminal ties: Expanding VAWA criminal jurisdiction for Indian tribes. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166, 745–787.
Eid, T. A., & Doyle, C. C. (2010). Separate but unequal: The federal criminal justice system in Indian country (Vol. 81, pp. 1067–1117). Boulder: University of Colorado Law Review.
French, L. (2005). Law enforcement in Indian country. Criminal Justice Studies, 18(1), 69–80.
Goldberg, C., & Champagne, D. (2006). Indian law at a crossroads: Is Public Law 280 fit for the twenty-first century? Some data at last. Connecticut Law Review, 38, 697–729.
Kalish, J. (1996). Do the states have an ace in the hole or should the Indians call their bluff? Tribes caught in the power struggle between the federal government and the states. Arizona Law Review, 38(4), 1345–1371.
Kronowitz, R., Lichtman, J., McSloy, S., & Olsen, M. G. (1987). Toward consent and cooperation: Reconsidering the political status of Indian nations. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review, 22(2), 507–622.
Laurence, R. (1981). The Indian commerce clause. Arizona Law Review, 23(1), 203–261.
McCool, C. (2018). Welcome to the Mvskoke reservation: Murphy v. Royal, criminal jurisdiction, and reservation diminishment in Indian country. American Indian Law Review, 42, 355–389.
Morrow, K. (2019). Bridging the jurisdictional void: Cross-deputization agreements in Indian country. North Dakota Law Review, 94, 66–94.
Newton, N. (1984). Federal power over Indians: Its sources, scope, and limitations. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 132(1), 195–288.
O’Brien, S. (1989). American Indian tribal governments. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
O’Brien, S. (1991). Tribes and Indians: With whom does the United States maintain a relationship? Notre Dame Law Review, 66(5), 1461–1502.
Riley, A. R. (2016). Crime and governance in Indian country. UCLA Law Review, 63, 1564–1637.
Smith, C. E. (1993). Courts, politics, and the judicial process. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, Inc.
Turner, A. (1988). Evolution, assimilation, and state control of gambling in Indian country: Is Cabazon v. California an assimilationist wolf in preemption clothing? Idaho Law Review, 24(2), 317–338.
Wakeling, S., Jorgensen, M., Michaelson, S., & Begay, M. (2001). Policing on American Indian reservations (Research report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Walsh, M. (1983). Terminating the Indian termination policy. Stanford Law Review, 35, 1181–1215.
Wells, L. E., & Falcone, D. N. (2008). Tribal policing on American Indian reservations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 31(4), 648–673.
Wild, R. J. (2019). The last judicial frontier: The fight for recognition and legitimacy of tribal courts. Minnesota Law Review, 103, 1603–1647.
Wilkinson, C., & Biggs, E. R. (1977). The evolution of the termination policy. American Indian Law Review, 5, 139–184.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morin, R., Morin, C. (2019). Policing Native American Lands in the United States. In: Albrecht, J.F., den Heyer, G., Stanislas, P. (eds) Policing and Minority Communities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19182-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19182-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19181-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19182-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)