Skip to main content

Mechanical Circulatory Support

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cardiovascular Hemodynamics

Part of the book series: Contemporary Cardiology ((CONCARD))

Abstract

In other chapters, there are detailed discussions of acute decompensated heart failure (Chap. 19) and shock (Chap. 21). Cardiogenic shock (CS) represents a state in which cardiac dysfunction is either wholly or partially responsible for an inadequate level of cardiac output to support end-organ function. CS is an especially dangerous state, with in-hospital mortality as high as 27–51% (van Diepen et al., Circulation. 136:e232–68, 2017). Therefore, interventions that promptly reverse the pathophysiologic process are critical. While CS can result from a variety of etiologies – acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute valvular regurgitation, decompensated heart failure, ventricular tachycardic storm, or myocarditis, to name just a few – once the insult triggers primary dysfunction, the nature of CS is a downward spiral of consequences ultimately resulting in multi-organ failure and death. Even if myocardial ischemia is not the primary cause of cardiac dysfunction, a drop in cardiac output and coronary perfusion pressure during CS nonetheless leads to ischemia and further systolic and diastolic dysfunction, both of which precipitate a feedback loop of progressive dysfunction. This chapter focuses on the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to intervene in the early stages of this cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136(16):e232–68. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Uriel N, Sayer G, Annamalai S, Kapur NK, Burkhoff D. Mechanical unloading in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(5):569–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thiele H, Ohman EM, Desch S, Eitel I, de Waha S. Management of cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(20):1223–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stretch R, Sauer CM, Yuh DD, Bonde P. National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(14):1407–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parissis H, Graham V, Lampridis S, Lau M, Hooks G, Mhandu PC. IABP: history-evolution-pathophysiology-indications: what we need to know. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0513-0.

  6. Naqvi SY, Salama IG, Yoruk A, Chen L. Ambulatory intra aortic balloon pump in advanced heart failure. Card Fail Rev. 2018;4(1):43–5. https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2018:22:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kern MJ, Aguirre FV, Tatineni S, et al. Enhanced coronary blood flow velocity during intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in critically ill patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21(2):359–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Briceno N, Kapur NK, Perera D. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support: current concepts and future directions. Heart. 2016;102(18):1494–507. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann F-J, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1287–96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1208410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Badiye AP, Hernandez GA, Novoa I, Chaparro SV. Incidence of hemolysis in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with Impella percutaneous left ventricular assist device. ASAIO J. 2016;62(1):11–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Flierl U, Tongers J, Berliner D, et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in cardiogenic shock patients on mechanical circulatory microaxial pump support. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Castillo-Sang MA, Prasad SM, Singh J, Ewald GA, Silvestry SC. Thirty-five day Impella 5.0 support via right axillary side graft cannulation for acute cardiogenic shock. Innovations (Phila). 2013;8(4):307–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(19):1584–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Engström AE, Cocchieri R, Driessen AH, et al. The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: the Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(9):2072–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821e89b5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ouweneel DM, Eriksen E, Sjauw KD, et al. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support versus intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(3):278–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Neill WW, Schreiber T, Wohns DHW, et al. The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella registry. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/joic.12080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hall SA, Uriel N, Carey SA, et al. Use of a percutaneous temporary circulatory support device as a bridge to decision during acute decompensation of advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(1):100–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2017.09.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lima B, Kale P, Gonzalez-Stawinski GV, Kuiper JJ, Carey S, Hall SA. Effectiveness and safety of the Impella 5.0 as a bridge to cardiac transplantation or durable left ventricular assist device. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(10):1622–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gilotra NA, Stevens GR. Temporary mechanical circulatory support: a review of the options, indications, and outcomes. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2015;8(Suppl 1):75–85. https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S15718.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Burkhoff D, Cohen H, Brunckhorst C, O’Neill WW. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 2006;152(3):469.e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2006.05.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thiele H, Sick P, Boudriot E, et al. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(13):1276–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gregoric ID, Cohn WE, Akay MH, La Francesca S, Myers T, Frazier OH. CentriMag left ventricular assist system. Tex Heart Inst J. 2008;35(2):184–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rao P, Khalpey Z, Smith R, Burkhoff D, Kociol RD. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. Circ Heart Fail. 2018;11(9):e004905. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.004905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Patel S, Lipinski J, Al-Kindi S, et al. Simultaneous venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and percutaneous left ventricular decompression therapy with Impella is associated with improved outcomes in refractory cardiogenic shock. ASAIO J. 2019;65(1):21–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kapur NK, Esposito M. Hemodynamic support with percutaneous devices in patients with heart failure. Heart Fail Clin. 2015;11(2):215–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfc.2014.12.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoeper MM, Tudorache I, Kühn C, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation watershed. Circulation. 2014;130(10):864–5. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cakici M, Gumus F, Ozcinar E, et al. Controlled flow diversion in hybrid venoarterial-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;26(1):112–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivx259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Madershahian N, Nagib R, Wippermann J, Strauch J, Wahlers T. A simple technique of distal limb perfusion during prolonged femoro-femoral cannulation. J Card Surg. 2006;21(2):168–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.2006.00201.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Millar JE, Fanning JP, McDonald CI, McAuley DF, Fraser JF. The inflammatory response to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a review of the pathophysiology. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):387. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1570-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lim HS, Howell N, Ranasinghe A. The physiology of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Card Fail. 2017;23(2):169–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.10.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Feldman D, Pamboukian SV, Teuteberg JJ, et al. The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(2):157–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2012.09.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kapur Navin K, Esposito Michele L, Yousef B, et al. Mechanical circulatory support devices for acute right ventricular failure. Circulation. 2017;136(3):314–26. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kuchibhotla S, Esposito ML, Breton C, et al. Acute biventricular mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(10). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006670.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marwa A. Sabe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Katz, D.H., Sabe, M.A. (2019). Mechanical Circulatory Support. In: Askari, A., Messerli, A. (eds) Cardiovascular Hemodynamics. Contemporary Cardiology. Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19131-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19131-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19130-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19131-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics