Cardiac Catheterization: Right- and Left-Heart Catheterization

  • Michael D. Faulx
  • Khaled M. ZiadaEmail author
Part of the Contemporary Cardiology book series (CONCARD)


Myocardial performance is determined by the combined effects of preload, afterload, and contractility. In vivo myocardial performance is represented by the cardiac output, while loading conditions are defined by the interplay between volume, pressure, and vascular resistance within the cardiac chambers and great vessels. Clinical decision-making is often based on the best estimate of these central hemodynamic measures, in addition to the physical examination and a variety of biochemical and noninvasive tools. This approach is often successful; however, there are circumstances where clinical judgment or patient characteristics limit the utility of a noninvasive assessment. In these individuals, direct assessment of cardiovascular hemodynamics may provide the only route to a clear diagnosis or a thoughtful treatment plan.

In this chapter, the principles and practice of left- and right-heart catheterization as a method of invasive cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment will be discussed. In addition, the waveform characteristics of normal cardiovascular physiology will be reviewed as a prelude to the discussion of specific cardiovascular disease states presented in subsequent chapters.


Left-heart catheterization Right-heart catheterization Hemodynamics Artifacts Waveforms 


  1. 1.
    Wiggers CJ. Determinants of cardiac performance. Circulation. 1951;4(4):485–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harmon M, Gomes S, Oppenhein C, et al. Cerebral microembolism during cardiac catheterization and risk of acute brain injury: a prospective diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. 2007;37(8):2035–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, Marcus H, Diamond G, Chonette D. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:447–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Noto TJ Jr, Johnson LW, Krone R, Weaver WF, Clark DA, Kramer JR Jr, Vetrovec GW. Cardiac catheterization 1990: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn.1991;24(2):75–83.Google Scholar

Suggested Reading

  1. Antman EM, Marsh JD, Green LH, Grossman W. Blood oxygen measurements in the assessment of intracardiac left to right shunts: a critical appraisal of methodology. Am J Cardiol. 1980;46:265–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:2170–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Opotowsky AR, Hess E, Maron BA, et al. Thermodilution vs estimated Fick cardiac output measurement in clinical practice: an analysis of mortality from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (VA CART) program and Vanderbilt University. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(10):1090–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Sandoval Y, Burke MN, Lobo AS, et al. Contemporary arterial access in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(22):2233–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Todorovic M, Jensen EW, Thǿgerson C. Evaluation of dynamic performance in liquid filled catheter systems for measuring invasive blood pressure. Int J Clin Mon Comp. 1996;13(3):173–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Gill Heart and Vascular InstituteUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations