Skip to main content

Heart Teams for Women’s Heart Health: Advancing Cardiovascular Prevention and Care for Women

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Heart Teams for Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease

Abstract

Heart Teams consist of multidisciplinary teams of healthcare providers working collaboratively in the decision-making process to determine the best management strategies for individual patients. The issues affecting the field of women’s cardiovascular health are distinctly different from those being addressed by current Heart Teams, as providers working in this field are faced with a relative paucity of scientific data to drive clinical decisions, in addition to low levels of awareness and education about the unique aspects of cardiovascular disease in women. In order to overcome existing obstacles and improve research, knowledge, and practice of cardiovascular health in women, healthcare institutions need to bring these issues into the core of their priorities and strategic planning. This can be accomplished by the creation of a multidisciplinary Women’s Heart Health Team. By centralizing women’s cardiovascular health issues, healthcare centers will have the ability to change institutional culture, promote dissemination of knowledge, motivate staff engagement, develop necessary internal policies, and ultimately improve the quality and efficiency of cardiovascular prevention and care for women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Teo KK, Cohen E, Buller C, Hassan A, Carere R, Cox JL, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology/Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgery position statement on revascularization—multivessel coronary artery disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1482–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:e123–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, Bittl JA, Byrne JG, Fletcher BJ, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:e5–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luckraz H, Norell M, Buch M, James R, Cooper G. Structure and functioning of a multidisciplinary “Heart Team” for patients with coronary artery disease: rationale and recommendations from a joint BCS/BCIS/SCTS working group. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;48:524–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Webb J, Rodes-Cabau J, Fremes S, Pibarot P, Ruel M, Ibrahim R, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28:520–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R, Griffith C, Trevatt P, Richards M, et al. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ. 2010;340:c951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman JV, Wang Y, Akar J, Desai N, Krumholz H. National trends in atrial fibrillation hospitalization, readmission, and mortality for medicare beneficiaries, 1999-2013. Circulation. 2017;135:1227–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kesson EM, Allardice GM, George WD, Burns HJ, Morrison DS. Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women. BMJ. 2012;344:e2718.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Ms. Understood. Heart & Stroke 2018 heart report. Available at: https://www.heartandstroke.ca/-/media/pdf-files/canada/2018-heart-month/hs_2018-heart-report_en.ashx.

  10. McDonnell LA, Pipe AL, Westcott C, Perron S, Younger-Lewis D, Elias N, et al. Perceived vs actual knowledge and risk of heart disease in women: findings from a Canadian survey on heart health awareness, attitudes, and lifestyle. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:827–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McDonnell LA, Turek M, Coutinho T, Nerenberg K, de Margerie M, Perron S, et al. Women’s heart health: knowledge, beliefs, and practices of Canadian physicians. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018;27:72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barsheshet A, Brenyo A, Goldenberg I, Moss AJ. Sex-related differences in patients’ responses to heart failure therapy. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012;9:234–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fazal L, Azibani F, Vodovar N, Cohen Solal A, Delcayre C, Samuel JL. Effects of biological sex on the pathophysiology of the heart. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171:555–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoppe BL, Hermann DD. Sex differences in the causes and natural history of heart failure. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2003;5:193–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bucholz EM, Butala NM, Rathore SS, Dreyer RP, Lansky AJ, Krumholz HM. Sex differences in long-term mortality after myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Circulation. 2014;130:757–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dunlay SM, Roger VL. Gender differences in the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes of ischemic heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2012;9:267–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen SE, Henry S, Bond R, Pearte C, Mieres JH. Sex-specific disparities in risk factors for coronary heart disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015;17:49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herz ND, Engeda J, Zusterzeel R, Sanders WE, O’Callaghan KM, Strauss DG, et al. Sex differences in device therapy for heart failure: utilization, outcomes, and adverse events. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015;24:261–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scantlebury DC, Borlaug BA. Why are women more likely than men to develop heart failure with preserved ejection fraction? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011;26:562–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanghavi M, Gulati M. Sex differences in the pathophysiology, treatment, and outcomes in IHD. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015;17:511.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Boczar K, Coutinho T. Sex considerations in aneurysm formation, progression and outcomes. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34(4):362–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheung K, Boodhwani M, Chan KL, Beauchesne L, Dick A, Coutinho T. Thoracic aortic aneurysm growth: role of sex and aneurysm etiology. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(2):pii: e003792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Coutinho T. Arterial stiffness and its clinical implications in women. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:756–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Coutinho T, Borlaug BA, Pellikka PA, Turner ST, Kullo IJ. Sex differences in arterial stiffness and ventricular-arterial interactions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:96–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Coutinho T, Pellikka PA, Bailey KR, Turner ST, Kullo IJ. Sex differences in the associations of hemodynamic load with left ventricular hypertrophy and concentric remodeling. Am J Hypertens. 2016;29:73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Coutinho T, Yam Y, Chow BJW, Dwivedi G, Inacio J. Sex differences in associations of arterial compliance with coronary artery plaque and calcification burden. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(8):pii: e006079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pelletier R, Khan NA, Cox J, Daskalopoulou SS, Eisenberg MJ, Bacon SL, et al. Sex versus gender-related characteristics: which predicts outcome after acute coronary syndrome in the young? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:127–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reeves MJ, Bushnell CD, Howard G, Gargano JW, Duncan PW, Lynch G, et al. Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:915–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Coutinho T, Lamai O, Nerenberg K. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and cardiovascular diseases: current knowledge and future directions. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018;20:56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Haghikia A, Nonhoff J, Bauersachs J. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: current management and future perspectives. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1090–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Borlaug BA, Redfield MM. Diastolic and systolic heart failure are distinct phenotypes within the heart failure spectrum. Circulation. 2011;123:2006–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Saw J, Mancini GBJ, Humphries KH. Contemporary review on spontaneous coronary artery dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:297–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Martins D, Nelson K, Pan D, Tareen N, Norris K. The effect of gender on age-related blood pressure changes and the prevalence of isolated systolic hypertension among older adults: data from NHANES III. J Gend Specif Med. 2001;4:10–3, 20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wenger N. Tailoring cardiovascular risk assessment and prevention for women: one size does not fit all. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2017;2017:e201701.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Anand SS, Islam S, Rosengren A, Franzosi MG, Steyn K, Yusufali AH, et al. Risk factors for myocardial infarction in women and men: insights from the INTERHEART study. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:932–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Park TH, Ko Y, Lee SJ, Lee KB, Lee J, Han MK, et al. Identifying target risk factors using population attributable risks of ischemic stroke by age and sex. J Stroke. 2015;17:302–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. He J, Ogden LG, Bazzano LA, Vupputuri S, Loria C, Whelton PK. Risk factors for congestive heart failure in US men and women: NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:996–1002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Palatini P, Mos L, Santonastaso M, Saladini F, Benetti E, Mormino P, et al. Premenopausal women have increased risk of hypertensive target organ damage compared with men of similar age. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011;20:1175–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cheng S, Claggett B, Correia AW, Shah AM, Gupta DK, Skali H, et al. Temporal trends in the population attributable risk for cardiovascular disease: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Circulation. 2014;130:820–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Huxley R, Barzi F, Woodward M. Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2006;332:73–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Huxley RR, Woodward M. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Lancet. 2011;378:1297–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kurmann RD, Mankad R. Atherosclerotic heart disease in women with autoimmune rheumatologic inflammatory conditions. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:381–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Reynolds HR, Srichai MB, Iqbal SN, Slater JN, Mancini GB, Feit F, et al. Mechanisms of myocardial infarction in women without angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2011;124:1414–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Pepine CJ, Ferdinand KC, Shaw LJ, Light-McGroary KA, Shah RU, Gulati M, et al. Emergence of nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a woman’s problem and need for change in definition on angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1918–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Safdar B, D’Onofrio G, Dziura J, Russell RR, Johnson C, Sinusas AJ. Prevalence and characteristics of coronary microvascular dysfunction among chest pain patients in the emergency department. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018:2048872618764418.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, Simari RD, Lerman A, Lennon RJ, et al. Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circulation. 2012;126:579–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Codsi E, Gulati R, Rose CH, Best PJM. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection associated with pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:426–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Canto JG, Goldberg RJ, Hand MM, Bonow RO, Sopko G, Pepine CJ, et al. Symptom presentation of women with acute coronary syndromes: myth vs reality. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2405–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lichtman JH, Leifheit EC, Safdar B, Bao H, Krumholz HM, Lorenze NP, et al. Sex differences in the presentation and perception of symptoms among young patients with myocardial infarction: evidence from the VIRGO study (variation in recovery: role of gender on outcomes of young AMI patients). Circulation. 2018;137:781–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Kwok Y, Kim C, Grady D, Segal M, Redberg R. Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:660–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Garuba HA, Erthal F, Stadnick E, Alzahrani A, Chow B, deKemp R, et al. Optimizing risk stratification and noninvasive diagnosis of ischemic heart disease in women. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:400–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Vaccarino V, Sullivan S, Hammadah M, Wilmot K, Al Mheid I, Ramadan R, et al. Mental stress-induced-myocardial ischemia in young patients with recent myocardial infarction: sex differences and mechanisms. Circulation. 2018;137:794–805.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Clarke KW, Gray D, Keating NA, Hampton JR. Do women with acute myocardial infarction receive the same treatment as men? BMJ. 1994;309:563–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Steingart RM, Packer M, Hamm P, Coglianese ME, Gersh B, Geltman EM, et al. Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and ventricular enlargement investigators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:226–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Graham G, Xiao YY, Rappoport D, Siddiqi S. Population-level differences in revascularization treatment and outcomes among various United States subpopulations. World J Cardiol. 2016;8:24–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Khera S, Kolte D, Gupta T, Subramanian KS, Khanna N, Aronow WS, et al. Temporal trends and sex differences in revascularization and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in younger adults in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1961–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Pilgrim T, Heg D, Tal K, Erne P, Radovanovic D, Windecker S, et al. Age- and gender-related disparities in primary percutaneous coronary interventions for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0137047.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Carey IM, DeWilde S, Shah SM, Harris T, Whincup PH, Cook DG. Statin use after first myocardial infarction in UK men and women from 1997 to 2006: who started and who continued treatment? Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;22:400–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Truong QA, Murphy SA, McCabe CH, Armani A, Cannon CP, Group TS. Benefit of intensive statin therapy in women: results from PROVE IT-TIMI 22. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4:328–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Sun LY, Tu JV, Coutinho T, Turek M, Rubens FD, McDonnell L, et al. Sex differences in outcomes of heart failure in an ambulatory, population-based cohort from 2009 to 2013. CMAJ. 2018;190:E848–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Beale AL, Meyer P, Marwick TH, Lam CSP, Kaye DM. Sex differences in cardiovascular pathophysiology: why women are overrepresented in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2018;138:198–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Azibani F, Sliwa K. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: an update. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2018;15:297–306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Mair KM, Johansen AK, Wright AF, Wallace E, MacLean MR. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: basis of sex differences in incidence and treatment response. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171:567–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Benza RL, Miller DP, Gomberg-Maitland M, Frantz RP, Foreman AJ, Coffey CS, et al. Predicting survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from the registry to evaluate early and long-term pulmonary arterial hypertension disease management (REVEAL). Circulation. 2010;122:164–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Martin YN, Pabelick CM. Sex differences in the pulmonary circulation: implications for pulmonary hypertension. Am J Phys. 2014;306:H1253–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Treibel TA, Kozor R, Fontana M, Torlasco C, Reant P, Badiani S, et al. Sex dimorphism in the myocardial response to aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:962–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Dobson LE, Fairbairn TA, Plein S, Greenwood JP. Sex differences in aortic stenosis and outcome following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015;24:986–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Duncan AI, Lin J, Koch CG, Gillinov AM, Xu M, Starr NJ. The impact of gender on in-hospital mortality and morbidity after isolated aortic valve replacement. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:800–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ferrante G, Pagnotta P, Petronio AS, Bedogni F, Brambilla N, Fiorina C, et al. Sex differences in postprocedural aortic regurgitation and mid-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84:264–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hayashida K, Morice MC, Chevalier B, Hovasse T, Romano M, Garot P, et al. Sex-related differences in clinical presentation and outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:566–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Mihos CG, Klassen SL, Yucel E. Sex-specific considerations in women with aortic stenosis and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018;20:52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Klodas E, Enriquez-Sarano M, Tajik AJ, Mullany CJ, Bailey KR, Seward JB. Surgery for aortic regurgitation in women. Contrasting indications and outcomes compared with men. Circulation. 1996;94:2472–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Avierinos JF, Inamo J, Grigioni F, Gersh B, Shub C, Enriquez-Sarano M. Sex differences in morphology and outcomes of mitral valve prolapse. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:787–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Mokhles MM, Siregar S, Versteegh MI, Noyez L, van Putte B, Vonk AB, et al. Male-female differences and survival in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50:482–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Chan V, Chen L, Elmistekawy E, Ruel M, Mesana TG. Determinants of late outcomes in women undergoing mitral repair of myxomatous degeneration. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;23:779–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Vassileva CM, McNeely C, Mishkel G, Boley T, Markwell S, Hazelrigg S. Gender differences in long-term survival of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1367–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Tadros R, Ton AT, Fiset C, Nattel S. Sex differences in cardiac electrophysiology and clinical arrhythmias: epidemiology, therapeutics, and mechanisms. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:783–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Xiong Q, Proietti M, Senoo K, Lip GY. Asymptomatic versus symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of age/gender differences and cardiovascular outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2015;191:172–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Lip GY, Laroche C, Boriani G, Cimaglia P, Dan GA, Santini M, et al. Sex-related differences in presentation, treatment, and outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation in Europe: a report from the Euro Observational Research Programme Pilot survey on atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17:24–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Jeong HK, Cho JG, Lee KH, Park HW, Kim MR, Lee KJ, et al. Determinants of quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2014;172:e300–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Bhave PD, Lu X, Girotra S, Kamel H, Vaughan Sarrazin MS. Race- and sex-related differences in care for patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1406–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Hess PL, Hernandez AF, Bhatt DL, Hellkamp AS, Yancy CW, Schwamm LH, et al. Sex and race/ethnicity differences in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator counseling and use among patients hospitalized with heart failure: findings from the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Program. Circulation. 2016;134:517–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Wilcox JE, Fonarow GC, Zhang Y, Albert NM, Curtis AB, Gheorghiade M, et al. Clinical effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in men and women with heart failure: findings from IMPROVE HF. Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7:146–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Uhm JS, Park JW, Lee H, Kim TH, Youn JC, Joung B, et al. Cardiac vein accessibility according to heart diseases and sex: implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39:513–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Zusterzeel R, Selzman KA, Sanders WE, O’Callaghan KM, Caños DA, Vernooy K, et al. Toward sex-specific guidelines for cardiac resynchronization therapy? J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2016;9:12–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Sribhen K, Phankingthongkum R, Wannasilp N. Skeletal muscle disease as noncardiac cause of cardiac troponin T elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1334–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Sweeting MJ, Thompson SG, Brown LC, Powell JT, RESCAN Collaborators. Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2012;99:655–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Cowan JA Jr, Dimick JB, Henke PK, Rectenwald J, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR Jr. Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 1993 to 2003. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1085:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Katz DJ, Stanley JC, Zelenock GB. Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm prevalence, treatment, and outcome. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:561–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Dillavou ED, Muluk SC, Makaroun MS. A decade of change in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States: have we improved outcomes equally between men and women? J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:230–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Wisniowski B, Barnes M, Jenkins J, Boyne N, Kruger A, Walker PJ. Predictors of outcome after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and external validation of a risk prediction model. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:644–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Nienaber CA, Fattori R, Mehta RH, Richartz BM, Evangelista A, Petzsch M, et al. Gender-related differences in acute aortic dissection. Circulation. 2004;109:3014–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, Tittle SL, Rizzo JA, Kopf GS, et al. Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:17–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thais Coutinho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Coutinho, T. (2019). Heart Teams for Women’s Heart Health: Advancing Cardiovascular Prevention and Care for Women. In: Mesana, T. (eds) Heart Teams for Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19124-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19124-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19123-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19124-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics