Skip to main content

Usability Problems and Obstacles to Addressing Them in Health Information Software Implementations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 552))

Abstract

Usability is widely recognized as a desired attribute of technology, referring to how usable it is to the intended users. As health information systems in developing countries are increasingly digitalized, interaction with familiar analog technologies is replaced by digital user interfaces for many health workers. An array of literature documents usability problems in such initiatives, arguing for their adverse effects on the users, and the system as a whole. What makes it challenging to achieve usability in this context has, however, not been explored extensively. This empirical paper attempts to bring focus to this gap, by defining the concept of usability design obstacles, which refer to aspects that complicate the usability design process. The relevance of the concept is illustrated through three empirical vignettes based on two action research projects in Uganda and India. Three concrete obstacles are outlined. These are (1) constraints introduced by software, (2) constraints introduced by legacy design, and (3) scale and heterogeneity of user groups. It is argued that to address the usability problems commonly outlined and discussed by existing literature, more focus on how to overcome such usability design obstacles is crucial. The obstacles identified in the empirical case of this paper also represent avenues for further research, which are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as “something that stands in the way or that obstructs progress”.

References

  1. Lippeveld, T.: Routine health information systems: the glue of a unified health system. In: Keynote Address at the Workshop on Issues and Innovation in Routine Health Information in Developing Countries, Potomac, March 2001

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nielsen, P., Sæbø, J.I.: Three strategies for functional architecting: cases from the health systems of developing countries. Inf. Technol. Dev. 22(1), 134–151 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sahay, S., et al.: Grand challenges of public health: how can health information systems support facing them? Health Policy Technol. 7(1), 81–87 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pal, J., et al.: Changing data practices for community health workers: introducing digital data collection in West Bengal, India. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khajouei, R., Jaspers, M.: The impact of CPOE medication systems’ design aspects on usability, workflow and medication orders. Methods Inf. Med. 49(01), 03–19 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koppel, R., et al.: Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 293(10), 1197–1203 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Atashi, A., et al.: User interface problems of a nationwide inpatient information system: a heuristic evaluation. Appl. Clin. Inform. 7(1), 89 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ash, J.S., et al.: Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76, S21–S27 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosh, I., et al.: The persistence of paper: a case study in microfinance from Ghana. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nabovati, E., et al.: Usability evaluation of laboratory and radiology information systems integrated into a hospital information system. J. Med. Syst. 38(4), 35 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ISO, ISO 9241-11:2018: Ergonomics of human-system interaction—part 11: usability: definitions and concepts. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Medhi, I., et al.: Designing mobile interfaces for novice and low-literacy users. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 18(1), 2 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seffah, A., Metzker, E.: The obstacles and myths of usability and software engineering. Commun. ACM 47(12), 71–76 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bak, J.O., et al.: Obstacles to usability evaluation in practice: a survey of software development organizations. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barnicle, K.: Usability testing with screen reading technology in a Windows environment. In: Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability. ACM (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edwards, P.J., et al.: Evaluating usability of a commercial electronic health record: a case study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66(10), 718–728 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin, D., et al.: Implementing an HIS project: everyday features and practicalities of NHS project work. Health Inform. J. 10(4), 303–313 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Braa, J., et al.: Networks of action: sustainable health information systems across developing countries. MIS Q. 28, 337–362 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baskerville, R.L., Wood-Harper, A.T.: A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. In: Willcocks, L.P., Sauer, C., Lacity, Mary C. (eds.) Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 2, pp. 169–190. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29269-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Braa, J., Sahay, S.: Participatory design within the HISP network. In: Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, p. 235 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, M.: Utilizing the space for user participation: experiences from a public health project in Uganda. In: Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dittrich, Y.: Software engineering beyond the project–sustaining software ecosystems. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(11), 1436–1456 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kimaro, H.C., Titlestad, O.H.: Challenges of user participation in the design of a computer based system: the possibility of participatory customisation in low income countries. J. Health Inform. Dev. Countries 2(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kujala, S.: User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav. Inf. Technol. 22(1), 1–16 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fischer, G.: Rethinking software design in participation cultures. Autom. Softw. Eng. 15(3), 365–377 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Roland, L.K., et al.: P for platform: architectures of large-scale participatory design. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 29(2), 3–34 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magnus Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, M. (2019). Usability Problems and Obstacles to Addressing Them in Health Information Software Implementations. In: Nielsen, P., Kimaro, H. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies for Development. Strengthening Southern-Driven Cooperation as a Catalyst for ICT4D. ICT4D 2019. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 552. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19114-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19115-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics