Skip to main content

Product Recalls and Channel Pricing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Games in Management Science

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 280))

Abstract

We propose a stochastic differential game between a manufacturer and a retailer to investigate how the risk of facing a product recall impacts pricing strategies in marketing channels. By doing so, we analyze whether vendor agreements between manufacturers and retailers, which are signed before any unit is sold, could distort channel profits by aggravating double marginalization. We characterize the equilibrium pricing strategies in closed form for both linear and quadratic costs of recall. We find that the manufacturer and the retailer respond differently to certain clauses of the vendor agreement, but that in equilibrium, such agreements do not distort channel profit, even when costs of recall are quadratic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://suppliers.safeway.com.

  2. 2.

    https://www.thekrogerco.com/.

  3. 3.

    For instance, when χ = 0.001, ρ = 0.05, α = 1, δ = 0.01, κ M = 0.1 and κ R = 0.1, then S 2 − N 2 < 0; however, changing κ M from 0.1 to 0.15 yields S 2 − N 2 > 0.

References

  • Borah, A., & Tellis, G. J. (2016). Halo (Spillover) effects in social media: Do l? Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breton, M., Jarrar, R., & Zaccour, G. (2006). A note on feedback sequential equilibria in a Lanchester model with empirical application. Management Science, 52, 804–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawar, N., & Pillutla, M. M. (2000). Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilert, M., Jayachandran, S., Kalaignanam, K., & Swartz, T. A. (2017). Does it pay to recall your product early? An empirical investigation in the automobile industry. Journal of Marketing, 81(3), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haurie, A., & Moresino, F. (2006). A stochastic control model of economic growth with environmental disaster prevention. Automatica, 42, 1417–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingene, C. A., Taboubi, S., & Zaccour, G. (2012). Game-theoretic coordination mechanisms in distribution channels: Integration and extensions for models without competition. Journal of Retailing, 88, 476–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, S., Sigue, S. P., & Zaccour, G. (2000). Dynamic cooperative advertising in a channel. Journal of Retailing, 76, 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, S., & Zaccour, G. (2004). Differential games in marketing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Shankar, V. (2015). The dynamic impact of product-harm crises on brand preference and advertising effectiveness: An empirical analysis of the automobile industry. Management Science, 61, 2514–2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Herran, G., Rubel, O., & Zaccour, G. (2008). Competing for consumer’s attention. Automatica, 44, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehm, M. L., & Tybout, A. M. (2006). When will a brand scandal spill over, and how should competitors respond? Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 366–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, O. (2013). Stochastic competitive entries and dynamic pricing. European Journal of Operational Research, 231, 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, O. (2017). Profiting from product-harm crises in competitive markets. European Journal of Operational Research, 265, 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, O., Naik, P. A., & Srinivasan, S. (2011). Optimal advertising when envisioning a product-harm crisis. Marketing Science, 30, 1048–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, O., & Zaccour, G. (2007). A differential game of a dual distribution channel (pp. 547–568). Boston: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heerde, H., Helsen, K., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2007). The impact of a product-harm crisis on marketing effectiveness. Marketing Science, 26, 230–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccour, G. (2008). On the coordination of dynamic marketing channels and two-part tariffs. Automatica, 44, 1233–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Rubel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rubel, O. (2020). Product Recalls and Channel Pricing. In: Pineau, PO., Sigué, S., Taboubi, S. (eds) Games in Management Science. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 280. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19107-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics