Skip to main content

Abstract

For Murdoch the importance of the fact–value dichotomy is not to suggest that value is not real. Rather this separation is required in order to keep value pure and untainted with empirical facts. Here Murdoch focuses Kant and Wittgenstein, notably the Wittgenstein of the Tractatus. For both, value appears as an intimation of ‘something higher’. And it is here that Murdoch sees the deeper problem with various forms of the fact–value dichotomy: that in our explanations of human life the essential thing, value, must be built into our model or picture from the start if it is to be ultimately integrated into it at all, but that in doing so we may be accused of what Murdoch calls an unwarranted act of faith or intuition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Crary, A. 2007. Beyond moral judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crary, A. 2016. Inside ethics: On the demands of moral thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, C. 1995. The realistic spirit: Wittgenstein, philosophy and the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, C. 1996. ‘We are perpetually moralists’: Iris Murdoch, fact, and value. In Iris Murdoch and the search for human goodness, ed. Maria Antonaccio and William Schweiker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaita, R. 2004. Good and evil: An absolute conception, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, E., and R. Joyce, eds. 2019. The end of morality: Taking moral abolitionism seriously. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, B. (ed.). 1996. Truth in ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1964. Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals, trans. H.J. Paton. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, I. 1956. Vision and choice in morality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary 30: 32–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, I. 1985. The sovereignty of good. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, I. 1992. Metaphysics as a guide to morals (Abbreviated MGM). London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, A. 1965. On the basis of morality, trans. E.F.J. Payne. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, F. 1979. Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1961. Tractatus logico-philosopicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1968. Philosophical investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1979. Notebooks 1914–1916, 2nd ed., trans. G.E.M. Anscombe and ed. G.H. von Wright and G.E.M. Anscombe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Taylor, C. (2019). Fact and Value (MGM Chapter 2). In: Hämäläinen, N., Dooley, G. (eds) Reading Iris Murdoch's Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18967-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics