Skip to main content

Education in Burns

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Burns Volume 1

Abstract

This chapter will discuss surgical education, mentorship, and interprofessional education in the setting of the burn team. Surgical education is evolving from traditional methods towards a competency-based model which focuses on outcomes, emphasizes abilities, de-emphasizes time-based training, and promotes greater learner-centeredness. Simulation tools specific to burn training are being developed and will continue to be incorporated into residency programs. Mentorship is crucial in surgical training, and leaders in burn care are encouraged to incorporate the mentor–mentee relationship into their unit curricula to foster interest in the field to encourage the next generation of surgeons. Interprofessional education occurs when knowledge is obtained through collaboration with other professions, and the nature and composition of the burn team lends itself to excellence in this approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Halstead W. The training of the surgeon. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1904;15:267–75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buscarini M, Stein JP. Training the urologic oncologist of the future: where are the challenges? Urol Oncol. 2009;27:193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sachdeva AK, Bell RH, Britt LD, Tarpley JL, Blair PG, Tarpley MJ. National efforts to reform residency education in surgery. Acad Med. 2007;82:1200–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosen JM, Long SA, McGrath DM, Greer SE. Simulation in plastic surgery training and education: the path forward. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:729–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pugh CM, Watson A, Bell RH, Brasel KJ, Jackson GP, Weber SM, Kao LS. Surgical education in the internet era. J Surg Res. 2009;156:177–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bell RH, Biester TW, Tabuenca A, Rhodes RS, Cofer JB, Britt LD, Lewis FR. Operative experience of residents in US general surgery programs: a gap between expectation and experience. Ann Surg. 2009;249:719–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Drake FT, Aarabi S, Garland BT, Huntington CR, McAteer JP, Richards MK, Zern NK, Gow KW. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Surgery Resident Operative Logs: the last quarter century. Ann Surg. 2017;265:923–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frank JR, Snell LS, Ten CO, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing SR, Harris P, Glasgow NJ, Campbell C, Dath D, Harden RM, Iobst W, Long DM, Mungroo R, Richardson DL, Sherbino J, Silver I, Taber S, Talbot M, Harris KA. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32:638–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The next GME accreditation system—rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1051–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Competence by design. 2017. http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/cbd/competence-by-design-cbd-e.

  11. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The Plastic Surgery Milestone Project. 2015. http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/PlasticSurgeryMilestones.pdf.

  12. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The Surgical Critical Care Milestone Project. 2015. http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/SurgicalCriticalCareMilestones.pdf.

  13. Knox ADC, Gilardino MS, Kasten SJ, Warren RJ, Anastakis DJ. Competency-based medical education for plastic surgery: where do we begin? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:702e–10e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernandez GL, Page DW, Coe NP, Lee PC, Patterson LA, Skylizard L, St Louis M, Amaral MH, Wait RB, Seymour NE. Boot cAMP: educational outcomes after 4 successive years of preparatory simulation-based training at onset of internship. J Surg Educ. 2012;69:242–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chipman JG, Schmitz CC. Using objective structured assessment of technical skills to evaluate a basic skills simulation curriculum for first-year surgical residents. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:364–370.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davies J, Khatib M, Bello F. Open surgical simulation—a review. J Surg Educ. 2013;70:618–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Podolsky DJ, Fisher DM, Wong KW, Looi T, Drake JM, Forrest CR. Evaluation and implementation of a high-fidelity cleft palate simulator. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:85e–96e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aydin A, Shafi AMA, Shamim Khan M, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Current status of simulation and training models in urological surgery: a systematic review. J Urol. 2016;196:312–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirkman MA, Ahmed M, Albert AF, Wilson MH, Nandi D, Sevdalis N. The use of simulation in neurosurgical education and training. A systematic review. J Neurosurg. 2014;121:228–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim-Fine S, Brennand EA. Surgical simulation and competency. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016;43:575–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. King N, Kunac A, Merchant AM. A review of endoscopic simulation: current evidence on simulators and curricula. J Surg Educ. 2016;73:12–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gardner AK, Nepomnayshy D, Reickert C, Gee DW, Brydges R, Korndorffer JR, Scott DJ, Sachdeva AK. The value proposition of simulation. Surgery. 2016;160:546–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fitts P, Posner M. Human performance. Belmont, CA: Cole; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Boehler ML, Schwind CJ, Rogers DA, Ketchum J, O’Sullivan E, Mayforth R, Quin J, Wohltman C, Johnson C, Williams RG, Dunnington G. A theory-based curriculum for enhancing surgical skillfulness. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:492–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sadideen H, Wilson D, Moiemen N, Kneebone R. Proposing “the burns suite” as a novel simulation tool for advancing the delivery of burns education. J Burn Care Res. 2014;35:62–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ur R, Holmes JH, Johnson JE, Molnar JA, Carter JE. Development of a burn escharotomy assessment tool: a pilot study. J Burn Care Res. 2016;37:e140–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gallagher JJ, Goldin IM, O’Sullivan GM, Silverman EL, Mitchell KB, Yurt RW. Simulation of tangential excision: a test for construct validity. J Burn Care Res. 2015;36:558–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Choi A-RA, Tamblyn R, Stringer MD. Electronic resources for surgical anatomy. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:1082–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kalet AL, Coady SH, Hopkins MA, Hochberg MS, Riles TS. Preliminary evaluation of the Web Initiative for Surgical Education (WISE-MD). Am J Surg. 2007;194:89–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chenkin J, Lee S, Huynh T, Bandiera G. Procedures can be learned on the web: a randomized study of ultrasound-guided vascular access training. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:949–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Corrigan M, Reardon M, Shields C, Redmond H. “SURGENT”—student e-learning for reality: the application of interactive visual images to problem-based learning in undergraduate surgery. J Surg Educ. 2008;65:120–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roch GR. Much ado about mentors. Harv Bus Rev. 1979;57:14–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sprengel AD, Job L. Reducing student anxiety by using clinical peer mentoring with beginning nursing students. Nurse Educ. 2004;29:246–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sweet S, Fusner S. Social integration of the advanced placement LPN: a peer mentoring program. Nurse Educ. 2008;33:202–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gilmour JA, Kopeikin A, Douché J. Student nurses as peer-mentors: collegiality in practice. Nurse Educ Pract. 2007;7:36–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Flint JH, Jahangir AA, Browner BD, Mehta S. The value of mentorship in orthopaedic surgery resident education: the residents’ perspective. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1017–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McCord JH, McDonald R, Leverson G, Mahvi DM, Rikkers LF, Chen HC, Weber SM. Motivation to pursue surgical subspecialty training: is there a gender difference? J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:698–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Levy BD, Katz JT, Wolf MA, Sillman JS, Handin RI, Dzau VJ. An initiative in mentoring to promote residents’ and faculty members’ careers. Acad Med. 2004;79:845–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Palepu A, Friedman RH, Barnett RC, Carr PL, Ash AS, Szalacha L, Moskowitz MA. Junior faculty members’ mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 1998;73:318–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ramanan RA, Phillips RS, Davis RB, Silen W, Reede JY. Mentoring in medicine: keys to satisfaction. Am J Med. 2002;112:336–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jackson VA, Palepu A, Szalacha L, Caswell C, Carr PL, Inui T. “Having the right chemistry”: a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2003;78:328–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Topping KJ. The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: a typology and review of the literature. High Educ. 1996;32:321–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Heinrich KT, Scherr MW. Peer mentoring for reflective teaching: a model for nurses who teach. Nurse Educ. 1994;19:36–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Becker MK, Neuwirth JM. Teaching strategy to maximize clinical experience with beginning nursing students. J Nurs Educ. 2002;41:89–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sommer S. Active learning: cooperative, collaborative and peer learning. In: McKeachie W, Svinicki M, editors. Teaching tips: strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.; 2006. p. 213–20.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Miller A. Mentoring students & young people: a handbook of effective practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Benson CA, Morahan PS, Sachdeva AK, Richman RC. Effective faculty preceptoring and mentoring during reorganization of an academic medical center. Med Teach. 2002;24:550–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Möller MG, Karamichalis J, Chokshi N, Kaafarani H, Santry HP. Mentoring the modern surgeon. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2008;93:19–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wensel TM. Mentor or preceptor: what is the difference? Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006;63:1597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ramani S, Gruppen L, Kachur EK. Twelve tips for developing effective mentors. Med Teach. 2006;28:404–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Morton-Cooper A, Palmer A. Mentoring in practice. In: Morton-Cooper A, Palmer A, editors. Mentoring, preceptorship and clinical supervision. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science; 2000. p. 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ford HR. Mentoring, diversity, and academic surgery. J Surg Res. 2004;118:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sargeant J. Theories to aid understanding and implementation of interprofessional education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29:178–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Campbell SM, Hann M, Hacker J, Burns C, Oliver D, Thapar A, Mead N, Safran DG, Roland MO. Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ. 2001;323:784–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, Wears RL, Salisbury M, Dukes KA, Berns SD. Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1553–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Reeves S, Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Barr H, Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;CD002213.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Risser DT, Rice MM, Salisbury ML, Simon R, Jay GD, Berns SD. The potential for improved teamwork to reduce medical errors in the emergency department. The MedTeams Research Consortium. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34:373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stevenson K, Baker R, Farooqi A, Sorrie R, Khunti K. Features of primary health care teams associated with successful quality improvement of diabetes care: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2001;18:21–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Unützer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, Williams JW, Hunkeler E, Harpole L, Hoffing M, Della Penna RD, Noël PH, Lin EHB, Areán PA, Hegel MT, Tang L, Belin TR, Oishi S, Langston C, IMPACT Investigators, Improving Mood-Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment. Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2836–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Al-Mousawi AM, Mecott-Rivera GA, Jeschke MG, Herndon DN. Burn teams and burn centers: the importance of a comprehensive team approach to burn care. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:547–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Gibran NS, Klein MB, Engrav LH, Heimbach DM. UW Burn Center. A model for regional delivery of burn care. Burns. 2005;31(Suppl 1):S36–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kitto SC, Gruen RL, Smith JA. Imagining a continuing interprofessional education program (CIPE) within surgical training. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29:185–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education (CAIPE). What is CAIPE? 2016. https://www.caipe.org/.

  64. Sargeant J, Loney E, Murphy G. Effective interprofessional teams: “contact is not enough” to build a team. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:228–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Barr H. An anatomy of continuing interprofessional education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29:147–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hammick M, Olckers L, Campion-Smith C. Learning in interprofessional teams: AMEE Guide no 38. Med Teach. 2009;31:1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27:10–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Arias A, Bellman B. Networked collaborative research and teaching. In: Boschmann E, editor. The electronic classroom: a handbook for education in the electronic environment. Medford, NJ: Learned Information; 1995. p. 180–5.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Chen L, Gaines B. Modelling and supporting virtual cooperative interaction through the World Wide Web. In: Sudweeks F, McLaughlin M, Rafaeli S, editors. Networks and netplay: virtual groups on the Internet. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI; 1998. p. 221–42.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Harasim L, Hiltz S, Teles L, Turoff M. Learning networks: a field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge, MA: MIT; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Scardamalia M, Bereiter C. Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In: Koschmann T, editor. CSCL theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1996. p. 268–305.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Walsh K. Interprofessional education online: the BMJ Learning experience. J Interprof Care. 2007;21:691–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Luke R, Solomon P, Baptiste S, Hall P, Orchard C, Rukholm E, Carter L. Online interprofessional health sciences education: from theory to practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29:161–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Cooper H, Spencer-Dawe E, McLean E. Beginning the process of teamwork: design, implementation and evaluation of an inter-professional education intervention for first year undergraduate students. J Interprof Care. 2005;19:492–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Wilcock PM, Janes G, Chambers A. Health care improvement and continuing interprofessional education: continuing interprofessional development to improve patient outcomes. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29:84–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahriar Shahrokhi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vrouwe, S.Q., Shahrokhi, S. (2020). Education in Burns. In: Jeschke, M., Kamolz, LP., Sjöberg, F., Wolf, S. (eds) Handbook of Burns Volume 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18940-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18940-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18939-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18940-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics