Skip to main content

Prehospital Management of Burn Injuries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Burns Volume 1
  • 1874 Accesses

Abstract

In the last 20 years, large changes in burn care and in the background and logistics around the care for the burn injured have occurred which has implications for how burn care now should be administered and practically performed. Firstly, the incidence of burn injuries has decreased in the Western world and a decrease of about 30% is evident from e.g., since the eighties [1, 2]. In parallel, length of stay in the burn care facilities for the injured has been reduced to about 40% of what it was at that time [3, 4]. Thirdly, the outcome of burns has been significantly improved over the same time period. This may be exemplified by the 50% survival chance that was present for a 45% total burn surface area (TBSA%) burn in a 21-year-old in the late 1970s, which is to be compared to the corresponding 50% survival chance for 80–90% TBSA% burn in the same age patient today [5, 6]. Fourth, patients, with smaller burns, today are to a significant extent treated as outpatients and smaller injuries may have their surgery done as outpatients as well [7–9]. At the same time, an increasing proportion of the patients are in the elderly age groups where the injury poses a larger treat as compared to in younger patients [10, 11]. In this age group, care is to a large extent influenced also by co-morbidities and the possibility to obtain good end results seen especially from the patient perspective [12].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akerlund E, Huss FR, Sjoberg F. Burns in Sweden: an analysis of 24,538 cases during the period 1987-2004. Burns. 2007;33(1):31–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brigham PA, McLoughlin E. Burn incidence and medical care use in the United States: estimates, trends, and data sources. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996;17(2):95–107.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andel D, Kamolz LP, Niedermayr M, Hoerauf K, Schramm W, Andel H. Which of the abbreviated burn severity index variables are having impact on the hospital length of stay? J Burn Care Res. 2007;28(1):163–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Still JM Jr, Law EJ, Belcher K, Thiruvaiyarv D. Decreasing length of hospital stay by early excision and grafting of burns. South Med J. 1996;89(6):578–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gomez M, Cartotto R, Knighton J, Smith K, Fish JS. Improved survival following thermal injury in adult patients treated at a regional burn center. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29(1):130–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller SF, Bessey PQ, Schurr MJ, Browning SM, Jeng JC, Caruso DM, et al. National Burn Repository 2005: a ten-year review. J Burn Care Res. 2006;27(4):411–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mertens DM, Jenkins ME, Warden GD. Outpatient burn management. Nurs Clin North Am. 1997;32(2):343–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moss LS. Outpatient management of the burn patient. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2004;16(1):109–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tompkins D, Rossi LA. Care of out patient burns. Burns. 2004;30(8):A7–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bessey PQ, Arons RR, Dimaggio CJ, Yurt RW. The vulnerabilities of age: burns in children and older adults. Surgery. 2006;140(4):705–15; discussion 15–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sheridan R. Burns at the extremes of age. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28(4):580–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thombs BD, Singh VA, Halonen J, Diallo A, Milner SM. The effects of preexisting medical comorbidities on mortality and length of hospital stay in acute burn injury: evidence from a national sample of 31,338 adult patients. Ann Surg. 2007;245(4):629–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Praiss IL, Feller I, James MH. The planning and organization of a regionalized burn care system. Med Care. 1980;18(2):202–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yurt RW, Bessey PQ. The development of a regional system for care of the burn-injured patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2009;10(5):441–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vercruysse GA, Ingram WL, Feliciano DV. The demographics of modern burn care: should most burns be cared for by non-burn surgeons? Am J Surg. 2011;201(1):91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Munzberg M, Mahlke L, Bouillon B, Paffrath T, Matthes G, Wolfl CG. [Six years of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) in Germany: the 100th provider course in Hamburg]. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113:561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soreide K. Three decades (1978-2008) of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) practice revised and evidence revisited. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2008;16(1):19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sasaki J, Takuma K, Oda J, Saitoh D, Takeda T, Tanaka H, et al. Experiences in organizing Advanced Burn Life Support (ABLS) provider courses in Japan. Burns. 2010;36(1):65–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cochran A, Edelman LS, Morris SE, Saffle JR. Learner satisfaction with Web-based learning as an adjunct to clinical experience in burn surgery. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29(1):222–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindford AJ, Lamyman MJ, Lim P. Review of the emergency management of severe burns (EMSB) course. Burns. 2006;32(3):391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stone CA, Pape SA. Evolution of the Emergency Management of Severe Burns (EMSB) course in the UK. Burns. 1999;25(3):262–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Haberal M. Guidelines for dealing with disasters involving large numbers of extensive burns. Burns. 2006;32(8):933–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Steinvall I, Bak Z, Sjoberg F. Acute respiratory distress syndrome is as important as inhalation injury for the development of respiratory dysfunction in major burns. Burns. 2008;34(4):441–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cartotto R. Fluid resuscitation of the thermally injured patient. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36(4):569–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tricklebank S. Modern trends in fluid therapy for burns. Burns. 2009;35(6):757–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lund T, Onarheim H, Reed RK. Pathogenesis of edema formation in burn injuries. World J Surg. 1992;16(1):2–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vlachou E, Gosling P, Moiemen NS. Microalbuminuria: a marker of endothelial dysfunction in thermal injury. Burns. 2006;32(8):1009–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vlachou E, Gosling P, Moiemen NS. Microalbuminuria: a marker of systemic endothelial dysfunction during burn excision. Burns. 2008;34(2):241–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lawrence A, Faraklas I, Watkins H, Allen A, Cochran A, Morris S, et al. Colloid administration normalizes resuscitation ratio and ameliorates “fluid creep”. J Burn Care Res. 2010;31(1):40–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Saffle JI. The phenomenon of “fluid creep” in acute burn resuscitation. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28(3):382–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Warden GD. Burn shock resuscitation. World J Surg. 1992;16(1):16–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Baxter CR, Shires T. Physiological response to crystalloid resuscitation of severe burns. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1968;150(3):874–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oda J, Yamashita K, Inoue T, Harunari N, Ode Y, Mega K, et al. Resuscitation fluid volume and abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with major burns. Burns. 2006;32(2):151–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Holm C, Mayr M, Tegeler J, Horbrand F, Henckel von Donnersmarck G, Muhlbauer W, et al. A clinical randomized study on the effects of invasive monitoring on burn shock resuscitation. Burns. 2004;30(8):798–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bak Z, Sjoberg F, Eriksson O, Steinvall I, Janerot-Sjoberg B. Hemodynamic changes during resuscitation after burns using the Parkland formula. J Trauma. 2009;66(2):329–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sjoberg F. The ‘Parkland protocol’ for early fluid resuscitation of burns: too little, too much, or ... even ... too late ...? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(6):725–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. The ABLS Manual. https://www.scribd.com/document/83859073/ABLS-Advanced-Burn-Life-Support-Provider-Manual. Assessed 8 Aug 2019.

  38. Choiniere M, Melzack R, Rondeau J, Girard N, Paquin MJ. The pain of burns: characteristics and correlates. J Trauma. 1989;29(11):1531–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Raff T, Germann G, Hartmann B. The value of early enteral nutrition in the prophylaxis of stress ulceration in the severely burned patient. Burns. 1997;23(4):313–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Greenhalgh DG. Sepsis in the burn patient: a different problem than sepsis in the general population. Burns Trauma. 2017;5:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Potes C, Conroy B, Xu-Wilson M, Newth C, Inwald D, Frassica J. A clinical prediction model to identify patients at high risk of hemodynamic instability in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):282.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Branski LK, Herndon DN, Byrd JF, Kinsky MP, Lee JO, Fagan SP, et al. Transpulmonary thermodilution for hemodynamic measurements in severely burned children. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kraft R, Herndon DN, Branski LK, Finnerty CC, Leonard KR, Jeschke MG. Optimized fluid management improves outcomes of pediatric burn patients. J Surg Res. 2013;181(1):121–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wurzer P, Branski LK, Jeschke MG, Ali A, Kinsky MP, Bohanon FJ, et al. Transpulmonary thermodilution versus transthoracic echocardiography for cardiac output measurements in severely burned children. Shock. 2016;46(3):249–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Greenhalgh DG. Defining sepsis in burn patients: still a long way to go. J Burn Care Res. 2017;38(6):e990–e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Soussi S, Deniau B, Ferry A, Leve C, Benyamina M, Maurel V, et al. Low cardiac index and stroke volume on admission are associated with poor outcome in critically ill burn patients: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6(1):87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Folke Sjöberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Referral and Transport Checklist

Appendix: Referral and Transport Checklist

1.1 Organization, Logistics, and Communication

Sending hospitals contact recipient hospitals. Responsible physician at dispatch unit decides on transport method in consultation with the doctor on the receiving unit, and always has the medical responsibility for the transportation until this can be handed over to the receiving unit’s medical doctor/specialist.

Those who transport patients should have the right skills for the task and should be used to transport/treat intensive care patients. For intubated or unstable patients, there should be two therapists in the care room and one of them must be specialist anesthetist.

All patient interventions before, during and after the transport should follow the patient, such as referral, list lists, surveillance lists, drug lists, hospital notes.

Other patient actions that are crucial for patient care after reception but not affecting treatment during transportation such as X-ray examination or hospital notes can be faxed to receiving in order not to delay transport. These documents shall, however, always be delivered at the receiving device by the time the patient arrives. X-rays should, if possible, be sent electronically.

Prior to transport, the transport team shall contact a dispatching hospital and receiving hospital and have relevant contact information (phone number/name) available under the entire transportation.

The mobile phone’s benefit is superior to the potential risk of interference electronic equipment. With a plastic surgeon on the receiving unit, the chosen transport method is confirmed and preliminary arrival time communicated. Convey with receiving ICU doctors and discuss possible measures in case of deterioration of the patient’s condition. The transport team shall inform the patient of the condition and assess the patient’s general status before transport.

Examinations that should be carried out before transport:

  • Trauma assessment

  • Blood gas

  • Relevant X-ray examinations

  • Blood samples (Hemoglobin/Hct and coagulation)

  • B-glucose

  • Other relevant studies (possibly including blood grouping and base test)

    • ENT tubes and i.v. lines properly sutured

1.2 Monitoring

The basic principle of monitoring is that it must be at least the same monitoring level as at the sending hospital and should include:

  • ECG with arrhythmia monitoring

  • Invasive blood pressure measurement (invasive central circulation surveillance)

  • Pulse oximetry

  • Capnography (if the patient is intubated; controlled against arterial blood gas)

  • Temperature measurement (if transport time exceeds 2–4 h, and with larger burns—continuous). For all larger burns, active heating should be secured by thermoregulated fluidized beds

  • Diuresis (mL/h)

Treatment targets for all shipments are as follows (unless other target orders are given):

  • SpO2 > 92%

  • PCO2 4.5–5.5 kPa

  • Temperature 37.5 °C

  • Diuresis 0.5–1 mL/kg/h

  • Blood gas and electrolytes within the normal reference range

Summary Box

The chapter describes the first evaluation and triage of the burn-injured patient and provides algorithms (ABLS/ATLS) for the early examination and stabilization (first 24 h) prior to transport. Based on present guidelines, details are provided in the ABCDE format for patient evaluation and finally especially challenging issues are addressed, together with referral and transport recommendations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sjöberg, F. (2020). Prehospital Management of Burn Injuries. In: Jeschke, M., Kamolz, LP., Sjöberg, F., Wolf, S. (eds) Handbook of Burns Volume 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18940-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18940-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18939-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18940-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics