Skip to main content

Endophytic Bacteria as a Modern Tool for Sustainable Crop Management Under Stress

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Soil Biology ((SOILBIOL,volume 55))

Abstract

Plant growth and development under both biotic and abiotic stress is enabled by the bacteria residing in plants, especially in the roots. Of many isolated endophytic bacteria, two isolates, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, on the basis of the presence of the nifH gene and growth elevation potential were selected as a tool to develop tolerance in crops under stress. Plants inoculated with such bacteria have better nutrient status under stress. Abiotic stress, especially salinity, causes consequences in altered protein profiling, production of low molecular weight chaperones, as well as production of nontoxic osmo-protectants in plants to overcome stress. Isolated endophytes also induce differential gene expression of β-1,3-glucanase and RAB18, which has been observed during RNA profiling. Such plants acquire better ability to survive under stressful environments. These findings suggest that the ecologically safe endophytic bacteria can be a modest and economic tool for regulating several plant metabolites and opposing stress to enhance crop production by assisting stress management in crop plants. Use of such beneficial bacteria in diverse agronomic systems to develop plants broadly resistant under both stressed and normal states is a current need.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alavilli H, Awasthi JP, Rout GR, Sahoo L, Lee B, Panda SK (2016) Overexpression of a barley aquaporin gene, HvPIP2;5, confers salt and osmotic stress tolerance in yeast and plants. Front Plant Sci 7:1566

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berg G, Smalla K (2009) Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 68:1–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves M, Flexas J, Pinheiro C (2008) Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot 103:551–560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dimkpa CO, Svatos A, Dabrowska P, Schmidt A, Boland W, Kothe E (2008) Involvement of siderophores in the reduction of metal-induced inhibition of auxin synthesis in Streptomyces spp. Chemosphere 74:19–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egamberdieva D (2009) Alleviation of salt stress by plant growth regulators and IAA producing bacteria in wheat. Acta Physiol Plant 31:861–864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egamberdieva D, Kucharova Z, Davranov K, Berg G, Makarova N, Azarova T, Chebotar V, Tikhonovich I, Kamilova F, Validov S, Lugtenberg B (2010) Bacteria able to control foot and root rot and to promote growth of cucumber in salinated soils. Biol Fertil Soils 47:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne P, Diquelou S, Prudent M, Salon C, Maillard A, Ourry A (2018) Macro and micronutrient storage in plants and their remobilization when facing scarcity: the case of drought. Agriculture 8:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaiero JR, McCall CA, Thompson KA, Day NJ, Best AS, Dunfield KE (2013) Inside the root microbiome: bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. Am J Bot 100:1738–1750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Ravi I, Sharma V (2013) Induction of β-1,3-glucanase and chitinase activity in the defense response of Eruca sativa plants against the fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicicola. J Plant Interact 8:155–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hardoim PR, Van Overbeek LS, Elass JD (2008) Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol 16(10):463–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horn G, Hofweber R, Kremer W, Kalbitzer HR (2007) Structure and function of bacterial cold shock proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci 64:1457–1470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain M, Ahmed SM, Abderrahman W (2008) Cluster analysis and quality assessment of logged water at an irrigation project, eastern Saudi Arabia. J Environ Manag 86:297–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y (2017) Potassium mobilizing bacteria: enhance potassium intake in paddy to regulate membrane permeability and accumulate carbohydrates under salinity stress. Braz J Biol Sci 4(8):333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y (2018a) Induction of anatomical, enzymatic, and molecular events in maize by PGPR under biotic stress. In: Meena V (ed) Role of rhizospheric microbes in soil. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y (2018b) Effects of salinity on growth physiology, accumulation of osmo-protectant and autophagy-dependent cell death of two maize varieties. Russ Agric Sci 44(2):124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y (2019) Endophytic bacteria mediated anti-autophagy and induced catalase, β-1,3-glucanases gene in paddy after infection with pathogen Pyricularia grisea. Indian Phytopathol 72:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y, Subramanian RB (2011) Endophytic Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes shows better response against the Magnaporthe grisea than a rhizospheric Bacillus pumilus in Oryza sativa (rice). Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect 44:592–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y, Subramanian RB (2013a) Paddy inoculated with PGPR show better growth physiology and nutrient content under salinity. Chilean J Agric Res 73(1):213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y, Subramanian RB (2013b) Root associated bacteria from the rice antagonizes the growth of Magnaporthe grisea. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 4:164

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y, Subramanian RB (2014a) Characterization of root associated bacteria from paddy and its growth promotion efficacy. 3 Biotech 4(3):325–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y, Subramanian RB (2014b) Under saline stress plant growth promoting bacteria affect growth, photosynthesis and antioxidant activities in paddy. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol 7(2):205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y, Subramanian RB (2015) Reduced cell death and improved cell membrane integrity in rice under salinity by root associated bacteria. Theor Exp Plant Physiol 3:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y, Subramanian RB (2016) Rhizobacteria enhance oil content and physiological status of Hyptis suaveolens under salinity stress. Rhizosphere 1:33–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y, Subramanian RB (2018) From interaction to gene induction: an eco-friendly mechanism of PGPR-mediated stress management in the plant. In: Egamberdieva D, Ahmad P (eds) Plant microbiome: stress response. Microorganisms for sustainability, vol 5. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y, Subramanian RB, Patel S (2011) Combination of endophytic and rhizospheric plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in Oryza sativa shows higher accumulation of osmoprotectant against saline stress. Acta Physiol Plant 33:797–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y, Sablok G, Naidu Subbarao N, Sudhakar R, TurabeFazil MHU, Subramanian RB, Squartini KS (2014a) Bacterial-induced expression of RAB18 protein in Orzya sativa salinity stress and insights into molecular interaction with GTP ligand. J Mol Recognit 27:521–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jha Y, Subramanian RB, Jethwa R, Patel N (2014b) Identification of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from Suaeda nudiflora plant and its effect on maize. Indian J Plant Prot 42(4):422–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Liang G, Yang S, Yu D (2014) Arabidopsis wrky57 functions as a node of convergence for jasmonic acid- and auxin-mediated signaling in jasmonic acid-induced leaf senescence. Plant Cell 26:230–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel SL, Herschberger N, Kim SH, Doty SL (2015) Diazotrophic endophytes of poplar and willow for growth promotion of rice plants in nitrogen-limited conditions. Crop Sci 55:1765–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang BG, Kim WT, Yun HS, Chang SC (2010) Use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to control stress responses of plant roots. Plant Biotechnol Rep 4:179–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpievitch YV, Polpitiya AD, Anderson GA, Smith RD, Dabney AR (2010) Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based proteomics: biological and technological aspects. Ann Appl Stat 4(4):1797–1823

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal M, Wani S (2015) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria: drought stress alleviators to ameliorate crop production in dry lands. Ann Microbiol 66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-015-1112-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockshin RA, Zakeri Z (2004) When cells die. II: A comprehensive evaluation of apoptosis and programmed cell death. Wiley-Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutgtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallik S, Nayak M, Sahu BB, Panigrahi AK, Shaw BP (2011) Response of antioxidant enzymes to high NaCl concentration in different salt-tolerant plants. Biol Plant 55:191–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria that confer resistance to water stress in tomato and pepper. Plant Sci 166:525–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittler R, Blumwald E (2015) The roles of ROS and ABA in systemic acquired acclimation. Plant Cell 27:64–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ng LM, Melcher K, Teh BT, Xu HE (2014) Abscisic acid perception and signaling: structural mechanisms and applications. Acta Pharmacol Sin 35:567–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pozo M, Azcon-Aguilar C (2007) Unraveling mycorrhiza-induced resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:393–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2007.05.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers JM, Mazzola M (2015) Diversity and natural functions of antibiotics produced by beneficial and plant pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:403–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raja N (2013) Biopesticides and biofertilizers: ecofriendly sources for sustainable agriculture. J Biofertil Biopestic 4:e112. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6202.1000e112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T (2011) Living inside plants: bacterial endophytes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14:435–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saharan BS, Nehra V (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review. Life Sci Med Res 20:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Santi C, Bogusz D, Franche C (2013) Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Ann Bot 111:743–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Santos VB, Araujo SF, Leite LF, Nunes LA, Melo JW (2012) Soil microbial biomass and organic matter fractions during transition from conventional to organic farming systems. Geoderma 170:227–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Ashraf M (2013) Improving salinity tolerance in cereals. Crit Rev Plant Sci 32:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao HB, Chu LY, Jaleel CA, Zhao CX (2008) Water-deficit stress-induced anatomical changes in higher plants. C R Biol 54(3):215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tester M, Bacic A (2005) Abiotic stress tolerance in grasses. From model plants to crop plants. Plant Physiol 137(3):791–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WX, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A (2004) Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci 9(5):244–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Wang C, Liu P, Lei C, Hao W, Gao Y (2016) Enhanced rice blast resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the ERF transcription factor gene OsERF922. PLoS One 11:e0154027

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhonghua C, Cuin TA, Zhou M, Twomey A, Naidu BP, Shabala S (2007) Compatible solute accumulation and stress-mitigating effects in barley genotypes contrasting in their salt tolerance. J Exp Bot 58:4245–4255

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jha, Y. (2019). Endophytic Bacteria as a Modern Tool for Sustainable Crop Management Under Stress. In: Giri, B., Prasad, R., Wu, QS., Varma, A. (eds) Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture and Environment . Soil Biology, vol 55. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18933-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics