Abstract
The rapid growth of digital marketplaces such as Amazon, iTunes, and Google Play has increased the need for insights on how consumers react to large assortments. Many of these platforms aggregate large assortments under the assumption that customers assign more value to products chosen from a large assortment. Yet, academic literature on the topic remains controversial. Although some moderating factors have been examined in previous research, knowledge about the influence of individual differences remains limited. This study offers further insights into the moderating role of age that leads to diverse assortment size preferences. Particularly, we conduct an online experiment in online donations where participants make actual donations to charities that they choose from either large or small assortments. Our study affirms that older customers assign more value on options chosen from platforms with relatively larger assortments. Hence, this study contributes to the choice overload literature regarding perceived value by considering age. Managers of digital platforms can use the presented findings to match assortment with customer age.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R., Griffin, M.: Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J. Consum. Res. 20(4), 644–656 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1086/209376
Baumol, W.J., Ide, E.A.: Variety in retailing. Manage. Sci. 3(1), 93–101 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.3.1.93
Betancourt, R., Gautschi, D.: Demand complementarities, household production, and retail assortments. Mark. Sci. 9(2), 146–161 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.9.2.146
Bettman, J.R., Park, C.W.: Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: a protocol analysis. J. Consum. Res. 7(3), 234–248 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1086/208812
Boatwright, P., Nunes, J.C.: Reducing assortment: an attribute-based approach. J. Mark. 65(3), 50–63 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.3.50.18330
Boyd, D.E., Bahn, K.D.: When do large product assortments benefit consumers? An information-processing perspective. J. Retail. 85(3), 288–297 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2009.05.008
Broniarczyk, S.M.: Product assortment. In: Handbook of Consumer Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 755–779 (2008). http://sites.utexas.edu/sbroniarczyk/files/2012/04/Assortment.HandbookConsumerPsychology.broniarczyk20081.pdf
Broniarczyk, S.M., Hoyer, W.D., McAlister, L.: Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: the impact of item reduction. J. Mark. Res. 166–176 (1998). https://www.jstor.org/stable/3151845
Chernev, A.: Decision focus and consumer choice among assortments. J. Consum. Res. 33(1), 50–59 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1086/504135
Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U., Goodman, J.: Choice overload: a conceptual review and meta-analysis. J. Consum. Psychol. 25(2), 333–358 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002
Deci, E.L.: The Psychology of Self Determination. Heath, Lexington (1981)
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality. J. Res. Pers. 19(2), 109–134 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Diehl, K., Poynor, C.: Great expectations?! Assortment size, expectations, and satisfaction. J. Mark. Res. 47(2), 312–322 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.2.312
Eppinger, B., Heekeren, H.R., Li, S.C.: Age differences in the neural mechanisms of intertemporal choice under subjective decision conflict. Cereb. Cortex 28(11), 3764–3774 (2017)
Fasolo, B., Carmeci, F.A., Misuraca, R.: The effect of choice complexity on perception of time spent choosing: When choice takes longer but feels shorter. Psychol. Mark. 26(3), 213–228 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20270
Gao, L., Simonson, I.: The positive effect of assortment size on purchase likelihood: the moderating influence of decision order. J. Consum. Psychol. 26(4), 542–549 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.12.002
Gourville, J.T., Soman, D.: Overchoice and assortment type: when and why variety backfires. Mark. Sci. 24(3), 382–395 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0109
Greenleaf, E.A., Lehmann, D.R.: Reasons for substantial delay in consumer decision making. J. Consum. Res. 22(2), 186–199 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1086/209444
Hayes, A.F.: Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression based approach. J. Educ. Meas. 51(3), 335–337 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050
Iyengar, S.S., Lepper, M.R.: When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79(6), 995 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
Jacoby, J.: Perspectives on information overload. J. Consum. Res. 10(4), 432–435 (1984). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2488912
Kahn, B.E., Lehmann, D.R.: Modeling choice among assortments. J. Retail. 67(3), 274 (1991). https://repository.upenn.edu/marketing_papers/241
Kahn, B.E., Wansink, B.: The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. J. Consum. Res. 30(4), 519–533 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1086/380286
Kahn, B.E., Weingarten, E., Townsend, C.: Assortment variety: too much of a good thing? In: Review of Marketing Research, pp. 1–23. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2013). https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/S1548-6435%282013%290000010005
Klemperer, P.: Competition when consumers have switching costs: an overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Rev. Econ. Stud. 62(4), 515–539 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/2298075
Koelemeijer, K., Oppewal, H.: Assessing the effects of assortment and ambience: a choice experimental approach. J. Retail. 75(3), 319–345 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)00011-1
Kotler, P.: Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs (1997). https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550810911683
Lancaster, K.: The economics of product variety: a survey. Mark. Sci. 9(3), 189–206 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.9.3.189
Langer, E.J., Rodin, J.: The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 34(2), 191 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.191
Lee, B.K., Lee, W.N.: The effect of information overload on consumer choice quality in an on-line environment. Psychol. Mark. 21(3), 159–183 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20000
Lurie, N.H.: Decision making in information-rich environments: the role of information structure. J. Consum. Res. 30(4), 473–486 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1086/380283
Malhotra, N.K.: Reflections on the information overload paradigm in consumer decision making. J. Consum. Res. 10(4), 436–440 (1984). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488913
Mathmann, F., Chylinski, M., de Ruyter, K., Higgins, E.T.: When plentiful platforms pay off: assessment orientation moderates the effect of assortment size on choice engagement and product valuation. J. Retail. 93(2), 212–227 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2017.02.001
Messinger, P.R., Narasimhan, C.: A model of retail formats based on consumers’ economizing on shopping time. Mark. Sci. 16(1), 1–23 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.16.1.1
Menon, S., Kahn, B.E.: The impact of context on variety seeking in product choices. J. Consum. Res. 22(3), 285–295 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1086/209450
Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T., Iyengar, S.S.: The mere categorization effect: How the presence of categories increases choosers’ perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. J. Consum. Res. 35(2), 202–215 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1086/588698
Oppewal, H., Koelemeijer, K.: More choice is better: effects of assortment size and composition on assortment evaluation. Int. J. Res. Mark. 22(1), 45–60 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.03.002
Reed, A.E., Mikels, J.A., Simon, K.I.: Older adults prefer less choice than young adults. Psychol. Aging 23(3), 671 (2008)
Reutskaja, E., Hogarth, R.M.: Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: when “goods satiate”. Psychol. Mark. 26(3), 197–203 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20268
Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., Todd, P.M.: Can there ever be too many options? a meta-analytic review of choice overload. J. Consum. Res. 37(3), 409–425 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1086/651235
Schwartz, B., Ward, A.: Doing better but feeling worse: the paradox of choice. Positive Psychol. Pract. 86–104 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939338.ch6
Sela, A., Berger, J., Liu, W.: Variety, vice, and virtue: how assortment size influences option choice. J. Consum. Res. 35(6), 941–951 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1086/593692
Simonson, I.: The effect of product assortment on buyer preferences4. J. Retail. 75(3), 347–370 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)00012-3
Spassova, G., Isen, A.M.: Positive affect moderates the impact of assortment size on choice satisfaction. J. Retail. 89(4), 397–408 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2013.05.003
Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N.: Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale. J. Retail. 77(2), 203–220 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
Taylor, S.E., Brown, J.D.: Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol. Bull. 103(2), 193 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
Whitley, S.C., Trudel, R., Kurt, D.: The influence of purchase motivation on perceived preference uniqueness and assortment size choice. J. Consum. Res. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy031
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pham, T., Mathmann, F. (2019). The Impact of Age on the Relationship Between Assortment Size and Perceived Value. In: Martínez-López, F., Gázquez-Abad, J., Roggeveen, A. (eds) Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing. NB&PL 2019. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18911-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18911-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18910-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18911-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)