Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hybrid Peacebuilding in Asia

Abstract

To create an environment within which mid-space local gatekeepers can play a constructive role in peace processes, it is important to identify bridge-builders who are capable of playing, connecting, integrating and transforming roles in divided societies. Their success will be determined by whether they utilise hybrid peacebuilding drawing on local culture and customs so that they enjoy ‘locally grounded legitimacy’. This concluding chapter recapitulates the main argument of the book, which is that the institutionalisation of a set of multi-layered platforms or spaces for dialogue across multiple cleavages and between local stakeholders and outside intervenors is critical to the development of locally grounded legitimacy, which is a key to effective and sustainable hybrid peacebuilding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K., & Nolan, A. (2008). States Emerging from Hybrid Political Orders—Pacific Experiences. Occasional Papers Series No. 11. Brisbane: Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K., & Nolan, A. (2009). On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: What Is Failing—States in the Global South or Research and Politics in the West? In Martina Fischer and Beatrix Schmelzle (Eds.), Building Peace in the Absence of States: Challenging the Discourse on State Failure (pp. 15–35). Berghof Handbook Dialogue Series No. 8. Berlin: Berghof.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, K. (2009). Internal Dynamics and External Interventions. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 21(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, K. (2014). What Is Legitimacy and Why Does It Matter for Peace? Accord: An International Review of Peace Initiatives, (25), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, B. (2009). Are Hybrid Political Orders an Appropriate Concept for State-Formation? Timor-Leste Revisited. In Martina Fischer & Beatrix Schmelzle (Eds.), Building Peace in the Absence of States: Challenging the Discourse on State Failure (pp. 79–86). Berghof Handbook Dialogue Series No. 8. Berlin: Berghof.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, B., & Uesugi, Y. (2016). The Legality and Legitimacy of UN Peacekeeping Missions in East Timor. Waseda Global Forum, 12, 81–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffer, E. (2005). Governance, Corruption, and Ethics in the Pacific. The Contemporary Pacific, 17(1), 118–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsall, T. (2008). Going with the Grain in African Development? Discussion Paper No. 1. London: The Africa Power and Politics Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurer, O. (2001). Why Do Voters Support Corrupt Politicians? In K. J. Arvind (Ed.), The Political Economy of Corruption (Routledge Contemporary Economic Policy Issues 2) (pp. 63–86). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. (2016). The Fallacy of Constructing Hybrid Political Orders: A Reappraisal of the Hybrid Turn in Peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping, 23(2), 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uesugi, Y. (2017). Chapter 6: Neo-Authoritarian Peace in Timor-Leste. In B. Howe (Ed.), National Security, Statecentricity and Governance in East Asia (pp. 106–126). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uesugi, Y. (2018). Chapter Four Platforms for Dialogue and Hybrid Facilitators in the Bangsamoro Peace Process. In M. Yamada & M. Honda (Eds.), Complex Emergencies and Humanitarian Response (pp. 65–86). Osaka: Union Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin P. Clements .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clements, K.P., Uesugi, Y. (2020). Conclusion. In: Uesugi, Y. (eds) Hybrid Peacebuilding in Asia. Security, Development and Human Rights in East Asia. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18865-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics