Abstract
To create an environment within which mid-space local gatekeepers can play a constructive role in peace processes, it is important to identify bridge-builders who are capable of playing, connecting, integrating and transforming roles in divided societies. Their success will be determined by whether they utilise hybrid peacebuilding drawing on local culture and customs so that they enjoy ‘locally grounded legitimacy’. This concluding chapter recapitulates the main argument of the book, which is that the institutionalisation of a set of multi-layered platforms or spaces for dialogue across multiple cleavages and between local stakeholders and outside intervenors is critical to the development of locally grounded legitimacy, which is a key to effective and sustainable hybrid peacebuilding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K., & Nolan, A. (2008). States Emerging from Hybrid Political Orders—Pacific Experiences. Occasional Papers Series No. 11. Brisbane: Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Queensland.
Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K., & Nolan, A. (2009). On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: What Is Failing—States in the Global South or Research and Politics in the West? In Martina Fischer and Beatrix Schmelzle (Eds.), Building Peace in the Absence of States: Challenging the Discourse on State Failure (pp. 15–35). Berghof Handbook Dialogue Series No. 8. Berlin: Berghof.
Clements, K. (2009). Internal Dynamics and External Interventions. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 21(1), 1–13.
Clements, K. (2014). What Is Legitimacy and Why Does It Matter for Peace? Accord: An International Review of Peace Initiatives, (25), 13–17.
Hofmann, B. (2009). Are Hybrid Political Orders an Appropriate Concept for State-Formation? Timor-Leste Revisited. In Martina Fischer & Beatrix Schmelzle (Eds.), Building Peace in the Absence of States: Challenging the Discourse on State Failure (pp. 79–86). Berghof Handbook Dialogue Series No. 8. Berlin: Berghof.
Howe, B., & Uesugi, Y. (2016). The Legality and Legitimacy of UN Peacekeeping Missions in East Timor. Waseda Global Forum, 12, 81–107.
Huffer, E. (2005). Governance, Corruption, and Ethics in the Pacific. The Contemporary Pacific, 17(1), 118–140.
Kelsall, T. (2008). Going with the Grain in African Development? Discussion Paper No. 1. London: The Africa Power and Politics Programme.
Kurer, O. (2001). Why Do Voters Support Corrupt Politicians? In K. J. Arvind (Ed.), The Political Economy of Corruption (Routledge Contemporary Economic Policy Issues 2) (pp. 63–86). London: Routledge.
Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. (2016). The Fallacy of Constructing Hybrid Political Orders: A Reappraisal of the Hybrid Turn in Peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping, 23(2), 219–239.
Uesugi, Y. (2017). Chapter 6: Neo-Authoritarian Peace in Timor-Leste. In B. Howe (Ed.), National Security, Statecentricity and Governance in East Asia (pp. 106–126). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Uesugi, Y. (2018). Chapter Four Platforms for Dialogue and Hybrid Facilitators in the Bangsamoro Peace Process. In M. Yamada & M. Honda (Eds.), Complex Emergencies and Humanitarian Response (pp. 65–86). Osaka: Union Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clements, K.P., Uesugi, Y. (2020). Conclusion. In: Uesugi, Y. (eds) Hybrid Peacebuilding in Asia. Security, Development and Human Rights in East Asia. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18865-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18865-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18864-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18865-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)