Skip to main content

Gender Inequality: Specific Areas of Gender Segregation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Gender Equality in the Workplace

Abstract

This chapter discusses four specific areas of gender segregation—segregation in politics, segregation in entrepreneurship, segregation in STEM and segregation in communist and post-communist economies. While in the first three areas, although significant improvements are evident, we continue to encounter lower participation and engagement by women because of the many barriers imposed upon them, a communist ideology (either from the past for post-communist countries or still present for contemporary communist countries) declaratively prescribes equality for women in all living and working spheres.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ådnanes, M. (2000). Youth and Gender in Post-communist Bulgaria. Journal of Youth Studies, 4(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baluta, I. (2014). Child Care in Post-communist Romania between Familialist Ideology, Labour Market and Gender Roles. Revista de cercetare si interventie sociala, 46, 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, E. (2000). Women in Transition: Changes in Gender Wage Differentials in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(1), 138–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codiroli Mcmaster, N. (2017). Who Studies STEM Subjects at a Level and Degree in England? An Investigation into the Intersections between Students’ Family Background, Gender and Ethnicity in Determining Choice. British Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 528–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, C., Caçador, S., Carvalho, I., Breda, Z., & Costa, R. (2014). Future Higher Education in Tourism Studies and the Labor Markets: Gender Perspectives on Expectations and Experiences. In D. Prebežac, C. Schott, & P. J. Sheldon (Eds.), The Tourism Education Futures Initiative (pp. 193–213). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuberes, D., & Teignier, M. (2016). Aggregate Effects of Gender Gaps in the Labor Market: A Quantitative Estimate. Journal of Human Capital, 10(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efthymiou, I., Vitsilakis, C., & Cakis, D. (2012). Horizontal and Vertical Gender Segregation in the ICT Sector: A Greek Case Study. Journal of Critical Studies in Business & Society, 3(1), 77–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P. (2010). The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled. Gender and Society, 24(2), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Institute for Gender Equality. (2017). Gender Equality Index 2017—Measuring Gender Equality in the European Union 2005–2015. Vilnius: European Institute for Gender Equality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidenvall, L. (2015). Women’s Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Nordic Politics. In W. Hofmaister, M. Sarmah, & D. Kaur (Eds.), Women, Policy and Political Leadership—Regional Perspectives in Today’s World (pp. 95–102). Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayles, J. G., & Ampaw, F. (2014). The Impact of College Experiences on Degree Completion in STEM Fields at Four-Year Institutions: Does Gender Matter? The Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 439–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundert, S., & Mayer, K. U. (2010). Gender Segregation in Training and Social Mobility of Women in West Germany. European Sociological Review, 28(1), 59–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haukanes, H. (2001). Anthropological Debates on Gender and the Post-communist Transformation. NORA—Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 9(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmaister, W., Sarmah, M., & Kaur, D. (Eds.). (2015). Women, Policy and Political Leadership—Regional Perspectives in Today’s World. Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korovushkina, I. (1999). Paradoxes of Gender: Writing History in Post-communist Russia 1987–1998. Gender & History, 11(3), 659–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovář, J., & Kovář, K. (2014). Representation of Women in Second-Order Elections: The Czech Republic and Slovakia Compared. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 15(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levanon, A., & Grusky, D. B. (2016). The Persistence of Extreme Gender Segregation in the Twenty-first Century. American Journal of Sociology, 122(2), 573–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lühiste, M., & Kenny, M. (2016). Pathways to Power: Women’s Representation in the 2014 European Parliament Elections. European Journal of Political Research, 55(3), 626–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y. (2011). Gender Differences in the Paths Leading to a STEM Baccalaureate. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1169–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, A. (2016). The Role of Cultural Contexts in Explaining Cross-National Gender Gaps in STEM Expectations. European Sociological Review, 32(1), 122–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, C. (2018). Focus: Men for Women in Tech. Retrieved July 2, 2018, from http://1sno3247bpch20c2dq23iqpy-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/Focus_men_for_women_in_tech.pdf

  • McKinsey & Company. (2018). Bridging the Talent gap in Denmark—Insights from Female Representation in STEM. Retrieved October 9, 2018, from https://innovationsfonden.dk/sites/default/files/2018-10/gender-diversity-in-denmark.pdf

  • Metcalfe, B. D., & Afanassieva, M. (2005). Gender, Work, and Equal Opportunities in Central and Eastern Europe. Women in Management Review, 20(6), 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais Maceira, H. (2017). Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU. Intereconomics, 52(3), 178–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). The Pursuit of Gender Equality: An Uphill Battle. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oprica, V. (2008). Gender Equality and Conflicting Attitudes Toward Women in Post-communist Romania. Human Rights Review, 9(1), 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrons, D. (2017). Gender and Inequality: Austerity and Alternatives. Intereconomics, 52(1), 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pološki Vokić, N., & Bulat, I. (2012). Što žene lideri unose u visoku politiku—psihološka i radna obilježja, stil vođenja, interesi i perspective [What Do Women Leaders Bring to Politics?—Psychological and Work Characteristics, Leadership Style, Interests and Perspectives]. In Proceedings of PAR International Leadership Conference—PILC ‘Women’s Leadership’ (pp. 25–35). Rijeka: Visoka poslovna škola PAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashkova, E. R., & Zankina, E. (2015). Women in Politics in Eastern Europe: A Changing Outlook. In W. Hofmaister, M. Sarmah, & D. Kaur (Eds.), Women, Policy and Political Leadership—Regional Perspectives in Today’s World (pp. 87–93). Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, J. (2015). Austerity and the Future for Gender Equality in Europe. ILR Review, 68(4), 715–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruminska-Zimny, E. W. (2002). Gender Aspects of Changes in the Labour Markets in Transition Economies. Retrieved August 2, 2018, from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/commission/2002/Ruminska-Zimny.pdf

  • Šarić, M. (2017). Ravnopravnost je šifra za uspjeh—Diskriminacija blokira društveni razvoj [Equality Is a Code for Success—Discrimination Blocks Societal Development]. Retrieved July 2, 2018, from https://www.onenastupaju.hr/2017/06/15/ravnopravnost-je-sifra-za-uspjeh-diskriminacija-blokira-drustveni-razvoj/

  • Selectio. (2017). Sve manje žena u upravama vodećih hrvatskih tvrtki [Less and Less Women in Boards of Croatian Companies]. Retrieved July 2, 2018, from https://www.selectio.hr/sve-manje-zena-u-upravama-vodecih-hrvatskih-tvrtki/

  • Sen, G. (1996). Gender, Markets and States: A Selective Review and Research Agenda. World Development, 24(6), 821–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Štěpán, J. (2005). Gender Segregation and Wage Gap: An East-West Comparison. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2/3), 598–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellhed, U., Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2017). Will I Fit in and Do Well? The Importance of Social Belongingness and Self-efficacy for Explaining Gender Differences in Interest in STEM and HEED Majors. Sex Roles, 77(1), 86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (1991). The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 958–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valenduc, G. (2011). Not a Job for Life? Women’s Progression, Conversion, and Dropout in ICT Professions. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(2), 483–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2017). Gender Segregation across Fields of Study in Post-Secondary Education: Trends and Social Differentials. European Sociological Review, 33(3), 449–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Langen, A. (2015). Girls and STEM Choice in Dutch Education: The Strong Gender Segregation and the Good Practice of the Stimulation Policy. Gender Studies and Research, 13, 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehviläinen, M., Vuolanto, P., & Ylijoki, O.-H. (2010). Gender Equality in Interface Organizations Between Science, Technology and Innovation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 5(1), 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wängnerud, L. (2009). Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. (2018). 2017 Midwest Sociological Society Presidential Address: Trump’s Election, Women’s Marches, and the Enduring Quest for Gender Equity in Politics. The Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. C. (2015). The 5 Biases Pushing Women Out of STEM. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved July 2, 2018, from https://hbr.org/2015/03/the-5-biases-pushing-women-out-of-stem

  • Wirth, L. (2001). Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling—Women in Management. Geneva: International Labour Office (ILO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Žvinklienė, A. (2016). Innovations in Gender Equality Politics in the Baltic States: From Woman to Gender Mainstreaming. Filosofija, sociologija, 27(4), 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Pološki Vokić .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pološki Vokić, N., Obadić, A., Sinčić Ćorić, D. (2019). Gender Inequality: Specific Areas of Gender Segregation. In: Gender Equality in the Workplace. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18861-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics