Skip to main content

Heritage and the Literary Biopic ‘Template’: Shakespeare, Austen, Wilde, and the Author as Product

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Screening the Author

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture ((PSADVC))

  • 394 Accesses

Abstract

Focusing on key representative films, including Becoming Jane (2007), Shakespeare in Love (1998), and Wilde (1997), Shachar theorises the dominant template of representation of the author on screen in the literary biopic. This analysis provides some much-needed critique of the dominant screen ‘template’ of the author in both aesthetic and wider cultural and economic terms. Using the case studies of these three films, Shachar argues how the literary biopic borrows from earlier iterations of heritage-inspired representations of the past to create a visual ‘language’ for the literary biopic that is based on capitalistic and cultural ‘worship’ of the Western author as a figure of cultural and national importance. She concludes by arguing that the screen ‘language’ of the literary biopic morphs with the online consumption of the author through social media and blogs as well as through fan by-products in websites such as Etsy and YouTube.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anonymous. 2011. Directed by Roland Emmerich. UK/Germany/USA, Columbia Pictures/Sony Pictures/Relativity Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, Jen. 2010. The Jane Austen Industry and Long Tail Marketing. Yale Economic Review 6 (2): 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bath Chronicle. 2007. Warm Welcome for Keira Movie. September 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becoming Jane. 2007. Directed by Julian Jarrold. UK/Ireland, HanWay Films/UK Film Council/Ecosse Films/Bórd Scannán na hÉireann/Miramax/BBC Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Andrew. 2005. The Author. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Judith. 2013. Introduction: Image, Story Desire: The Writer on Film. In The Writer on Film: Screening Literary Authorship, ed. Judith Buchanan, 3–32. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Richard. 2008. Film Review: Becoming Literary, Becoming Historical: The Scale of Female Authorship in Becoming Jane. Adaptation 1 (1): 58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartmell, Deborah. 2013. Becoming Jane in Screen Adaptations of Austen’s Fiction. In The Writer on Film: Screening Literary Authorship, ed. Judith Buchanan, 151–163. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dave, Paul. 1997. The Bourgeois Paradigm and Heritage Cinema. New Left Review 224: 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, Peter. 2005. Oscar Wilde: Reading the Life After the Life. Biography 28 (3): 414–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Richard. 1995. Heritage Cinema in Europe. In The Encyclopedia of European Cinema, ed. Ginette Vincendeau, 204–205. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fame Magazine. 2007. Jane Austen Festival in Bath. September 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lester (ed.). 1993. Fires Were Started: British Cinema and Thatcherism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geal, Robert. 2014. Suturing the Action to the Word: Shakespearean Enunciation and Cinema’s “Reality Effect” in Shakespeare in Love and Anonymous. Literature/Film Quarterly 42 (2): 438–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. 1979. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, David. 1995. Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison, Robert. 1987. The Heritage Industry: Britain in a Climate of Decline. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higson, Andrew. 2003. English Heritage, English Cinema: Costume Drama Since 1980. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higson, Andrew. 2011. Film England: Culturally English Filmmaking Since the 1990s. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holderness, Graham. 2011. Nine Lives of William Shakespeare. London: Continuum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, Fredric. 1991. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jane Eyre. 2011. Directed by Cary Fukunaga. UK/USA, Focus Features/BBC Films/Ruby Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Dennis. 1998. Shakespeare and Cultural Tourism. Theatre Journal 50 (2): 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley-Smith, Jane E. 2002. Shakespearean Authorship in Popular British Cinema. Literature/Film Quarterly 30 (3): 158–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, Peter. 2014. “You Have No Voice!”: Constructing Reputation Through Contemporaries in the Shakespeare Biopic. Shakespeare Bulletin 32 (1): 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lear Enterprises. 2018. Why the Green Carnation? Oscar Wilde Literary Tours. https://www.oscarwildetours.com/about-our-symbol-the-green-carnation/. Accessed 25 December 2018.

  • Lost in Austen. 2008. Directed by Dan Zeff. UK, ITV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louttit, Chris. 2013. Remixing Period Drama: The Fan Video and the Classic Novel Adaptation. Adaptation 6 (2): 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckman, Susan. 2013. The Aura of the Analogue in a Digital Age: Women’s Crafts, Creative Markets and Home-Based Labour After Etsy. Cultural Studies Review 19 (1): 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, Julia Reinhard. 2014. Birth Places: Shakespeare’s Beliefs/Believing in Shakespeare. Shakespeare Quarterly 65 (4): 399–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monk, Claire. 1995. The British “Heritage Film” and Its Critics. Critical Survey 7 (2): 116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, Claire. 1999. Heritage Films and the British Cinema Audience in the 1990s. Journal of Popular British Cinema 2: 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, Lisa. 2007. Becoming Jane. Sight and Sound 17 (4): 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Pepper, Megan. 2013. The “Tables of Memory”: Shakespeare, Cinema and the Writing Desk. In The Writer on Film: Screening Literary Authorship, ed. Judith Buchanan, 92–105. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, Sarah. 2008. The Pemberley Effect: Austen’s Legacy to the Historic House Industry. Persuasions 30: 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidduck, Julianne. 2004. Contemporary Costume Film: Space, Place and the Past. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pride and Prejudice. 1995. Directed by Simon Langton. UK, BBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoff, Dianne F. 2010. Victorian Vogue: British Novels on Screen. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Julie. 2012. Stratfordian Perambulations; or, Walking with Shakespeare. Critical Survey 24 (2): 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare in Love. 1998. Directed by John Madden. USA/UK, Universal Pictures/Miramax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, John Hunter. 2003. Becoming Jane Austen. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetz, Margaret D. 2000. Oscar Wilde at the Movies: British Sexual Politics and The Green Carnation (1960). Biography 23 (1): 90–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, John. 1997. The Essence, Not the Likeness: Review of Wilde, dir. Brian Gilbert, Wilde (Screenplay) by Julian Mitchell, and The Wilde Album, by Merlin Holland. Times Literary Supplement October 24: 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Invisible Woman. 2013. Directed by Ralph Fiennes. UK, BBC Films/Headline Pictures/Magnolia Mae Films/Sony Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet, Harry, Karel Dibbets, and Henk Gras. 2009. Culture in Context: Contextualization of Cultural Events. In Digital Tools in Media Studies: Analysis and Research, ed. Michael Ross, Manfred Grauer, and Bernd Freisleben, 27–42. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velvet Goldmine. 1998. Directed by Todd Haynes. UK/USA, Channel Four Films/Goldwyn Films/Killer Films/Miramax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, Belén. 2012. Heritage Film: Nation, Genre and Representation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincendeau, Ginette (ed.). 2001. Film/Literature/Heritage: A Sight and Sound Reader. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde. 1997. Directed by Brian Gilbert. UK, Samuelson Productions/Dove International/Capitol Films/BBC Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Sarah. 2007. Not So Plain Jane. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3663235/Not-so-plain-Jane.html. Accessed 27 December 2018.

  • Wiltshire, John. 2001. Recreating Jane Austen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hila Shachar .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shachar, H. (2019). Heritage and the Literary Biopic ‘Template’: Shakespeare, Austen, Wilde, and the Author as Product. In: Screening the Author. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18850-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics