Skip to main content

A Conceptual Business Process Entity with Lifecycle and Compliance Alignment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Support Systems IX: Main Developments and Future Trends (EmC-ICDSST 2019)

Abstract

This paper proposes a conceptual model that incorporates: (a) a business process entity, (b) a business process lifecycle aligned with the proposed entity, and (c) a compliance framework that focuses on the degree of process compliance to imposed regulatory standards. The pursuing objective is to systematize business processes through a conceptual entity applicable to Business Process Management (BPM) practices and compliance-checking. The applied methodology involves the review, interpretation and comparison of business process definitions, structural elements and their interrelations, acknowledged BPM lifecycles and compliance rules. The initial findings lead to the proposal of a contextual business process structure that sets the boundaries of business process as a clearly defined entity. The business process entity encompasses continuous modification of its design based on the feedback it generates. Additionally, a comparative analysis of prominent BPM lifecycles resulted in a proposed ‘business process lifecycle’ that allows for a better alignment of the included cycle steps. The proposed business process entity is also related with process compliance practices to produce compliance-aware business processes. The introduced conceptual model can assist professionals in apprehending core business process features, focusing on process flexibility and redesign. It can also serve as a preliminary prototype for checking the degree of compliance between a business process and the applicable compliance rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tsakalidis, G., Vergidis, K.: Towards a comprehensive business process optimization framework. In: 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), pp. 129–134. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hassani, A., Ghannouchi, S.A.: Analysis of massive e-learning processes: an approach based on big association rules mining. In: Park, J.H., Shen, H., Sung, Y., Tian, H. (eds.) PDCAT 2018. CCIS, vol. 931, pp. 188–199. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5907-1_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28616-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Der Aalst, W.M., Ter Hofstede, A.H., Weske, M.: Business process management: a comprehensive survey. ISRN Softw. Eng. 2013, 20 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Recker, J., Mendling, J.: The state of the art of business process management research as published in the BPM conference. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 58, 55–72 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Georgoulakos, K., Vergidis, K., Tsakalidis, G., Samaras, N.: Evolutionary multi-objective optimization of business process designs with pre-processing. In: 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 897–904. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Völkner, P., Werners, B.: A decision support system for business process planning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 125, 633–647 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindsay, A., Downs, D., Lunn, K.: Business processes—attempts to find a definition. Inf. Softw. Technol. 45, 1015–1019 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Pourshahid, A., et al.: Business process management with the user requirements notation. Electron. Commer. Res. 9, 269–316 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A class of Petri net for modeling and analyzing business processes. Comput. Sci. Rep. 95, 26 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Muehlen, M., Ho, D.T.-Y.: Risk management in the BPM lifecycle. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 454–466. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11678564_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Caetano, A., Silva, A.R., Tribolet, J.: Using roles and business objects to model and understand business processes. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1308–1313. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tyndale-Biscoe, S., Sims, O., Wood, B., Sluman, C.: Business modelling for component systems with UML. In: Proceedings of Sixth International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC 2002, pp. 120–131. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Born, M.: User Guidance in Business Process Modelling. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vom Brocke, J., Mendling, J.: Business Process Management Cases. Digital Innovation and Business Transformation in Practice. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58307-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma, Z., Leymann, F.: A lifecycle model for using process fragment in business process modeling. In: Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support (BPDMS 2008), pp. 1–9 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. van der Aalst, W.M.: Business process management: a personal view. Bus. Process Manag. J. 10 (2004). https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/bpmj.2004.15710baa.001?journalCode=bpmj

  19. Ruževičius, J., Milinavičiūtė, I., Klimas, D.: Peculiarities of the business process management lifecycle at different maturity levels: the banking sector’s case. Issues Bus. Law 4, 69–85 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Macedo de Morais, R., Kazan, S., Inês Dallavalle de Pádua, S., Lucirton Costa, A.: An analysis of BPM lifecycles: from a literature review to a framework proposal. Bus. Process Manag. J. 20, 412–432 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bernardo, R., Galina, S.V.R., de Pádua, S.I.D.: The BPM lifecycle: How to incorporate a view external to the organization through dynamic capability. Bus. Process Manag. J. 23, 155–175 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Netjes, M., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.: Supporting the BPM life-cycle with FileNet. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE, pp. 497–508. Citeseer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems: Challenges, Methods. Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30409-5

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jesus, L., Rosemann, M.: The future BPM: seven opportunities to become the butcher and not the Turkey. BPTrends, February 2017

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leth, S.A.: Critical success factors for reengineering business processes. Natl. Prod. Rev. 13, 557–568 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. vom Brocke, J., Zelt, S., Schmiedel, T.: On the role of context in business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36, 486–495 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, X., Mafuz, S.: Towards incorporating context awareness into business process management. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Int. J. Soc. Behav. Educ. Econ. Bus. Ind. Eng. 9, 3890–3897 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Le Vie, D.S., Donald, S.: Understanding data flow diagrams. In: Annual Conference - Society for Technical Communication, pp. 396–401 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Edwards, C.A.: Business process integrity and enterprise resource planning systems: an analysis of workaround practices in a large public sector organisation (2013). http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/79845

  30. Draheim, D.: Semantics of Business Process Models. In: Draheim, D. (ed.) Business process technology, pp. 75–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01588-5_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Bucher, T., Winter, R.: Taxonomy of business process management approaches. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 2, pp. 93–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01982-1_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Managing process variants in the process lifecycle (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: A conceptually rich model of business process compliance. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling, vol. 110, pp. 3–12. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ghanavati, S., Amyot, D., Peyton, L.: A systematic review of goal-oriented requirements management frameworks for business process compliance. In: 2011 Fourth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), pp. 25–34. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cabanillas, C., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Exploring features of a full-coverage integrated solution for business process compliance. In: Salinesi, C., Pastor, O. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNBIP, vol. 83, pp. 218–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22056-2_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Cabanillas Macías, C., Resinas Arias de Reyna, M., Ruiz Cortés, A.: Hints on how to face business process compliance. In: III Taller De Procesos De Negocio E Ingeniería De Servicios, PNIS2010, Valencia, España (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sadiq, S., Governatori, G., Namiri, K.: Modeling control objectives for business process compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Daniel, F., et al.: Business compliance governance in service-oriented architectures. In: 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA 2009), pp. 113–120. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kostas Vergidis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tsakalidis, G., Vergidis, K., Delias, P., Vlachopoulou, M. (2019). A Conceptual Business Process Entity with Lifecycle and Compliance Alignment. In: Freitas, P., Dargam, F., Moreno, J. (eds) Decision Support Systems IX: Main Developments and Future Trends. EmC-ICDSST 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 348. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18819-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18819-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18818-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18819-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics