Abstract
Scholars of African Environmental Ethics have defended Ubuntu Environmental Ethics as an indigenous, attractive and relevant conception that is suitable for African culture and very little criticism has been offered to refine, revisit and problematise the concept. I argue that a generalised version of Ubuntu Environmental Ethics is problematic on several grounds. Firstly, the attempt to describe Ubuntu Environmental Ethics as shared in diverse African cultures commits the fallacy of hasty generalisation by trying to misrepresent diverse versions of environmental ethics into a single understanding. Secondly, considering various linguistic groups that share a common understanding of environmental thinking, it is hegemonic in tendency, to pick up a single linguistic version and come up with Ubuntu Environmental Ethics without showing other variants such as unhu, bunhu, untu, vumunhu and related versions. Thirdly, a generalized view of Ubuntu Environmental Ethics that is abstracted from specific cultural contexts such as Xhosa, Zulu, Ndebele, Shona, Ndau, Xitsonga, Venda, Tonga among others, results in ambiguity and vagueness rather than clarity and precision. Fourthly, a general view of Ubuntu Environmental Ethics gives a closed conception that fails to open up for debate and diversity in thinking about the environment in Southern African cultures. Fifthly, a geographical demarcation of Ubuntu Environmental Ethics that describes it as ‘Sub-Saharan’ is not only inadequatebut also arbitrary. The inadequacy of the demarcation is seen in the absence of the idea of Ubuntu Environmental Ethics in West Africa (Nigeria, Senegal, Ghana); East Africa (Uganda, Kenya Tanzania) and Central Africa (Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, Democratic Republic of Congo) yet all these regions are in Sub-Saharan Africa. The arbitrary nature of the demarcation is seen in failure to give a rational justification of the label resulting in a mismatch between the term and the region it attempts to refer. After examining these problems I shall give a proposal of how to re-conceptualise Environmental Ethics in Southern African cultures without falling into the said problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
While I acknowledge historical migratory patterns of people in Sub-Saharan Africa, these migrations give rise to similarities in language. However, the similarities do not necessarily constitute exactness in the languages concerned. As a result, it is ethical to respect language diversity without any form of linguistic hegemony.
References
Ajei, M. 2007. Africa’s Development: The Imperatives of Indigenous Knowledge and Values. PhD Thesis, Pretoria: UNISA unpublished.
Akena, F.A. 2012. Critical Analysis of the Production of Western Knowledge and Its Implications for Indigenous Knowledge and Decolonisation. Journal of Black Studies 43 (6): 336–400.
Behrens, K. 2010. Exploring African Holism with Respect to the Environment. Environmental Values 19 (4): 465–484.
Chemhuru, M., and D. Masaka. (2010). Taboos as Sources of Shona People’s Environmental Ethics. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa 121–133.
Chemhuru, M. 2014. The Ethical Import of African Metaphysics: A Critical Discourse in Shona Environmental Ethics. In Ontologized Ethics: New Essays in African Meta-Ethics, ed. E. Imafidon and J.A. Bewaji, 73–87. New York: Lexington Books.
Gyekye, K. 1997. Tradition and Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hountondji, P. 1996. African Philosophy: Myth and Reality. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
Hurley, J. 2011. A Concise Introduction to Logic. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Le Grange, L. 2012. Ubuntu, Ukama, Environment and Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 41(3). 329–340.
Martinich, A. 1989. Philosophical Writing. London: Prentice-Hall.
Mawere, M. 2012. Buried and Forgotten But Not Dead’: Reflections On ‘Ubuntu’ In Environmental Conservation In Southeastern Zimbabwe. Afro Asian Journal of Social Sciences 3 (3.2 Quarter II): 1–20.
Mawere, M. 2014. Environmental Conservation through Ubuntu and other Emerging Perspectives. Bamenda: Langaa Publications.
Mbiti, J. 1999. Africans Religions and Philosophy, 2nd ed. London: Heinemann.
Metz, T. 2017. Managerialism as Anti-Social: Some Implications of Ubuntu for Knowledge Production. In Knowledge and Change in African Universities, ed. M.C. Ndofirepi, 139–154. Rotterdam: Sense Publication.
Mignolo, W. 2009. Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom. Theory, Culture and Society 159–181.
Muchemwa, K., and M. Mazuru. 2016. Language Imperialism in Zimbabwe. Dzimbabwe Arts Festival. Masvingo: Great Zimbabwe University.
Murove, F. 2004. An African Commitment to Ecological Conservation: The Shona Concepts of Ukama and Ubuntu. Mankind Quarterly 45 (2): 195–215.
Museka, G., and M.M. Madondo. 2012. The Quest for a Relevant Environmental Pedagogy in the African Context: Insights from Ubuntu Philosophy. Journal of Ecology and Natural Environment 258–265.
Newenham-Kahindi, A. 2009. The Transfer of Ubuntu Indaba Business Models Abroad: A Case of South African Multinational Banks and Telecommunication Services in Tanzania. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 9 (1): 87–108.
Palmberg, M. 2001. A Continent without culture. In Same and Other: Negotiating African Identity in Cultural Production, ed. M.B. Palmberg, 197–209. Stochholm: Nordiska Afrikainstutet.
Ramose, M.B. 1999. African Philosophy. Harare: Mond Books.
Ramose, M. 2003. I Doubt, Therefore African Philosophy Exists. South African Journal of Philosophy 22 (2): 113–127.
Samkange, S., and T.M. Samkange. 1980. Hunhuism/Ubuntuism: A Zimbabwean Indigenous Political Philosophy. Harare: Graham Publishing.
Serequeberhan. 1996. The Critique of Eurocentrism and the Practice of African Philosophy. In Postcolonial African Philosophy: A Reader, ed. E.C. Eze, 141–161. Oxford: Blackwell.
Shumba, O. 2011. Commons Thinking Ecological intelligence and the Ethical and Moral Framework of Ubuntu: An Imperative for Sustainable Development. Journal of Media and Communication Studies 258–265.
Tempels, P. 1969. Bantu Philosophy. Paris: Presense Africaine.
Tutu, D. 1999. No Future Without Forgiveness. New York: Random House.
Van Nierkerk, J. 2015. Ubuntu and Moral Value. PhD Thesis, University of Johannesburg: Unpublished.
Warburton, N. 1996. Thinking from A-Z. London: Routledge.
Whitehead, J., J. Delong, and M. Huxtable. 2015. Participation and democratization of Knowledge: Living theory research for reconciliation. In ARNA, 1–20. New York: ARNA.
Zeleza, P. 2006. The Invention of African Identities and Languages: The Discursive and Developmental Implications. In 30th Annual Conference of African Linguistics, 14–26. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gwaravanda, E.T. (2019). Ubuntu Environmental Ethics: Conceptions and Misconceptions. In: Chemhuru, M. (eds) African Environmental Ethics. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18807-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18807-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18806-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18807-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)