Skip to main content

The African Emphasis on Harmonious Relations: Implications for Environmental Ethics and Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 637 Accesses

Abstract

To appreciate what an African perspective can contribute to environmental ethics, we should be careful, all things considered, not to get entangled in the dualisms that have characterized the central debates in Western environmental ethics. Dualisms such as anthropocentrism versus non anthropocentrism; or individualism versus holism may have been useful in informing particular positions on certain issues, however, they have often led to seemingly irreconcilable differences. Moreover, the positions taken by choosing either side of the dualisms are individually inadequate to capture what goes on in real life given the multifaceted human interactions with the natural world. Understanding justice within the framework of the African emphasis on harmonious relationships has a lot to contribute to an African conception of environmental ethics. Furthermore, some of the fundamental concerns about justice have the potential to stand up to the tide of Western influences which may not be the case with mere nostalgic references to African beliefs and attitudes toward the natural environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this sense, an African view of morality is something akin to virtue ethics although it is based on different motivations and ontology as opposed to the mere questions about politics and the good life.

  2. 2.

    On the same basis, concepts such as Ubuntu can also be a source of confusion if not properly contextualised.

  3. 3.

    It is from this perspective that Callicott would seem to claim that “…mention of African culture evokes no thoughts of indigenous environmental ethics” (Callicott 1994: 156).

  4. 4.

    Tangwa, for instance, proposes what he refers to as “eco-bio-communitarianism”.

  5. 5.

    As he claims, we need not recognise the intrinsic value of nonhuman objects; instead we can recognise the intrinsic value of our fellow humans and their preferences that nonhuman objects not be harmed.

  6. 6.

    Behrens refers to his theory (or perspective) as “African Relational Environmentalism”.

  7. 7.

    An ethnic group of people in Ethiopia.

  8. 8.

    This perspective appears to imply that in order to determine what is just, we must first determine what is moral. There can be a challenge therefore if what is considered just turns out or appears to be immoral.

  9. 9.

    In dealing with some of the disagreements between social ecology and deep ecology we will have to deal also with some disagreements between the principles of justice and ethics.

References

  • Attfield, R. 2003. Environmental Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W., and J. Pasek. 2010. In Defence of Anthropocentrism. In Environmental Ethics: The big questions, ed. D.R. Keller, 83–88. Wiley-Blackwell.: Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, K.G. 2011. African Philosophy, Thought and Practice and Their Contribution to Environmental Ethics. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, M. 2012. Social Ecology Versus Deep Ecology. In Environmental Ethics: Readings in Theory and Application, ed. L.P. Pojman and P. Pojman, 165–175. Cengage Learning.: Wordsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. 1994. Earth’s Insights. A Survey of Ecological Ethics from the Mediterranean Basinto the Australian Outback. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall, B., and G. Sessions. 2012. Deep Ecology. In Environmental Ethics: Readings in Theory and Application, ed. L.P. Pojman and P. Pojman, 143–148. Wordsworth, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. 1998. Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Dimensions of Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ekwealo, C.J. 2012. NduMmiliNduAzu (Live-And-Let-Live): African Environmental Ethics. Journal of African Environmental Ethics and Values. 3: 90–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferré, F. 2010. Persons in Nature: Toward an Applicable and Unified Environmental Ethics. In Environmental Ethics: The Big Questions, ed. D.R. Keller, 154–160. Wiley-Blackwell: Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, M., and F. Zorzi. 2013. Environmental Justice. UFRGSMUN/UFRGS Model United Nations Journal 1: 222–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyeke, K. 2011. African Ethics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/african-ethics/.

  • Hargrove, E. 2003. Weak Anthropocentric Intrinsic Value. In Environmental Ethics: An Anthology, ed. A. Light and H. Rolston III, 175–190. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, D. 2009. The Consequentialist side of Environmental Ethics. In The Environmental Responsibility Reader, ed. M. Reynolds, C. Blackmore, and M.J. Smith, 52–59. London: Zed Books/The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. 1995. Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition. Political Theory 20: 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibanga, F.D. 2016. Logical and Theoretical Foundations of African Environmental Ethics. Africology: The Journal of Pan African Studies. 9 (9): 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikuenobe, P.A. 2014. Traditional African Environmental Ethics and Colonial Legacy. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology. 2 (4): 01–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, D. 2008. Ethics and the Environment: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelbessa, W. 2005. The Rehabilitation of Indigenous Environmental Ethics in Africa. Diogenes 207: 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C.M. 1983. Two Distinctions in Goodness. The Philosophical Review 92 (2): 169–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, N., and B. Gleeson. 1998. Justice, Society and Nature. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, D.A. 2002. What is Environmental Justice? Introduction. In Environmental Justice in South Africa, ed. D.A. McDonald, Athens, 1–12. Ohio: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell, L. 2009. On Values and Obligations to the Environment. In The Environmental Responsibility Reader, ed. M. Reynolds, C. Blackmore, and M.J. Smith, 28–39. London: Zed Books/The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. 2007. Toward an African Moral Theory. The Journal of Political Philosophy. 15 (3): 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G. 2003. Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism. In Environmental Ethics: An Anthology, ed. A. Light and H. Rolston III, 163–174. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. 2003. The Varieties of Intrinsic Value. In Environmental Ethics: An Anthology, ed. A. Light and H. Rolston III, 131–142. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, A.C. 2013. Articulating Moral Bases for Regional Responses to Deforestation and Climate Change: Africa. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review. 38 (1): 81–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1972. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, III, H. 1988. A Review of Peter S. Wenz’s Environmental Justice. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangwa, G. 2004. Some African Reflections on Biomedical and Environmental Ethics. In A Companion to African philosophy, ed. K. Wiredu, 387–395. Oxford: Blackwell publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wienhues, A. 2017. Sharing the Earth: A Biocentric Account of Ecological Justice. J Agric Environ Ethics. (Published online).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M.J. 2010 Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/emtries/value-intrinsic-extrinsic.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Mweshi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mweshi, J. (2019). The African Emphasis on Harmonious Relations: Implications for Environmental Ethics and Justice. In: Chemhuru, M. (eds) African Environmental Ethics. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18807-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics