Skip to main content

Statistical Model Checking of Hazards in an Autonomous Tramway Positioning System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Reliability, Safety, and Security of Railway Systems. Modelling, Analysis, Verification, and Certification (RSSRail 2019)

Abstract

One promising option to improve performance and contain costs of current tramway signalling systems is to introduce an Autonomous Positioning System (APS) in substitution of traditional occupancy detecting sensors. APS is an onboard system that uses a plurality of sensors (such as GPS or inertial platform) and a Sensor Fusion Algorithm (SFA) to autonomously estimate the position of the tram with the needed levels of uncertainty and protection. Autonomous positioning however introduces, even in absence of faults, a quantitative uncertainty with respect to traditional sensors. This paper investigates this issue in the context of an industrial project: a model of the envisaged solution is adopted, and the Uppaal Statistical Model Checker is used to study possible hazards induced by the substitution of legacy track circuits with on-board satellite positioning equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/Integrity#Protection_Level

  2. Agha, G., Palmskog, K.: A survey of statistical model checking. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 28(1), 6:1–6:39 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Basile, D., Di Giandomenico, F., Gnesi, S.: Tuning energy consumption strategies in the railway domain: a model-based approach. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9953, pp. 315–330. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47169-3_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Basile, D., Di Giandomenico, F., Gnesi, S.: Statistical model checking of an energy-saving cyber-physical system in the railway domain. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2017), pp. 1356–1363. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Basile, D., ter Beek, M.H., Ciancia, V.: Statistical model checking of a moving block railway signalling scenario with Uppaal SMC. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2018. LNCS, vol. 11245, pp. 372–391. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03421-4_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Basile, D., et al.: On the industrial uptake of formal methods in the railway domain. In: Furia, C.A., Winter, K. (eds.) IFM 2018. LNCS, vol. 11023, pp. 20–29. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98938-9_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Basile, D., Di Giandomenico, F., Gnesi, S.: On quantitative assessment of reliability and energy consumption indicators in railway systems. In: Kharchenko, V., Kondratenko, Y., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Green IT Engineering: Social, Business and Industrial Applications. SSDC, vol. 171, pp. 423–447. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00253-4_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Basile, D., Giandomenico, F.D., Gnesi, S.: Dependable dynamic routing for urban transport systems through integer linear programming. In: Fantechi et al. [15], pp. 221–237

    Google Scholar 

  9. ter Beek, M.H., Legay, A., Lluch Lafuente, A., Vandin, A.: A framework for quantitative modeling and analysis of highly (re)configurable systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Behrmann, G., et al.: UPPAAL 4.0. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of SysTems (QEST 2006), pp. 125–126. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Biagi, M., Carnevali, L., Paolieri, M., Vicario, E.: Performability evaluation of the ERTMS/ETCS - level 3. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 82, 314–336 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bulychev, P., David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Li, G., Poulsen, D.B.: Rewrite-based statistical model checking of WMTL. In: Qadeer, S., Tasiran, S. (eds.) RV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7687, pp. 260–275. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35632-2_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Massink, M., Paškauskas, R., Vandin, A.: A tool-chain for statistical spatio-temporal model checking of bike sharing systems. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9952, pp. 657–673. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47166-2_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Mikučionis, M., Poulsen, D.B.: Uppall SMC tutorial. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 17(4), 397–415 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fantechi, A., Lecomte, T., Romanovsky, A.B. (eds.): RSSRail 2017. LNCS, vol. 10598. Springer, Heidelberg (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Larsen, K.G., Legay, A.: Statistical model checking past, present, and future. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8803, pp. 135–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45231-8_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Legay, A., Delahaye, B., Bensalem, S.: Statistical model checking: an overview. In: Barringer, H., et al. (eds.) RV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6418, pp. 122–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16612-9_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Legrand, C., Beugin, J., Conrard, B., Marais, J., Berbineau, M., El-Miloudi, E.K.: Approach for evaluating the safety of a satellite-based train localisation system through the extended integrity concept. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2015 - European Safety and Reliability Conference (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking: Multi-Annual Action Plan, 26 November 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/wp/jtis/h2020-maap-shift2rail_en.pdf

  20. Vicario, E., Sassoli, L., Carnevali, L.: Using stochastic state classes in quantitative evaluation of dense-time reactive systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(5), 703–719 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zimmermann, A., Hommel, G.: Towards modeling and evaluation of ETCS real-time communication and operation. J. Syst. Softw. 77(1), 47–54 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Aknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the Tuscany Region project POR FESR 2014-2020 SISTER “SIgnaling & Sensing Technologies in Railway application”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Basile .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Basile, D., Fantechi, A., Rucher, L., Mandò, G. (2019). Statistical Model Checking of Hazards in an Autonomous Tramway Positioning System. In: Collart-Dutilleul, S., Lecomte, T., Romanovsky, A. (eds) Reliability, Safety, and Security of Railway Systems. Modelling, Analysis, Verification, and Certification. RSSRail 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11495. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18744-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18744-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18743-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18744-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics