Skip to main content
  • 742 Accesses

Abstract

Restoration of intestinal continuity following total proctocolectomy is performed by constructing an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Since the advent of this technique in 1978, the operation has evolved from hand-sewn to stapled anastomoses, from a two-stage to three-stage approach in the setting of immunosuppression, and from an open technique to a minimally invasive approach. While laparoscopy has become widely used for IPAA construction, a robotic approach may offer several advantages and may become more widely used in future years. The bony confines of a narrow pelvis make the angles of laparoscopy challenging, and the robot provides improved three-dimensional and high-definition visualization of the pelvis. Once the pelvic floor has been exposed, the improved visualization and multiple degrees of freedom help to improve deployment of intracorporeal stapling devices. Herein, we discuss our approach to a robotic IPAA and highlight steps that may require intraoperative troubleshooting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J. 1978;2:85–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;222:120–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozois EJ, et al. Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg. 2006;243:667–70; discussion 670–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. White I, Jenkins JT, Coomber R, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1160–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed Ali U, Keus F, Heikens JT, et al. Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD006267.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bartels SA, D’Hoore A, Cuesta MA, et al. Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Ann Surg. 2012;256:1045–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beyer-Berjot L, Maggiori L, Birnbaum D, et al. A total laparoscopic approach reduces the infertility rate after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a 2-center study. Ann Surg. 2013;258:275–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3727–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Juo YY, Hyder O, Haider AH, et al. Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: first comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:177–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trinh BB, Jackson NR, Hauch AT, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2014;18:816–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, et al. Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:458–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1701–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertani E, Chiappa A, Biffi R, et al. Assessing appropriateness for elective colorectal cancer surgery: clinical, oncological, and quality-of-life short-term outcomes employing different treatment approaches. Int J Color Dis. 2011;26:1317–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khasawneh MA, McKenna NP, Abdelsattar ZM, et al. Impact of BMI on ability to successfully create an IPAA. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:1034–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burnstein MJ, Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, et al. Technique of mesenteric lengthening in ileal reservoir-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30:863–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Araki T, Parc Y, Lefevre J, et al. The effect on morbidity of mesentery lengthening techniques and the use of a covering stoma after ileoanal pouch surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:621–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martel P, Majery N, Savigny B, et al. Mesenteric lengthening in ileoanal pouch anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: is high division of the superior mesenteric pedicle a safe procedure? Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:862–6; discussion 866–867.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thirlby RC. Optimizing results and techniques of mesenteric lengthening in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg. 1995;169:499–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy L. Lightner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Video highlighting the stages of the completion proctectomy and ileal pouch proctectomy performed with a robotic platform (MP4 626490 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lightner, A.L., Larson, D.W. (2020). Robotic Pouch Creation. In: Kim, J., Garcia-Aguilar, J. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18740-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18740-8_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18739-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18740-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics