Skip to main content

Surgery of the Cranio-Vertebral Junction: Image Guidance, Navigation, and Augmented Reality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgery of the Cranio-Vertebral Junction

Abstract

Due to the density of essential, small, and mobile structures, mastering the surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral junction may be extremely challenging. Quality and safety of interventions can be improved using navigation. Currently, patient-specific anatomy preparation, surgical planning, intervention, and quality assessment are disconnected actions performed in different conditions and environments and by multiple team members. The whole process needs to be integrated by surgeons performing the intervention. The complexity of the process exposes to errors and degraded precision. It is therefore relevant to develop tools that reduce the need to extrapolate and simplify the information integration and increase the ergonomics of its display.

Imaging information is acquired in the intervention setting to reduce extrapolation using intra-operative imaging. The current point-based registration process of the navigation devices using reference infrared or electromagnetic fiducials provides at best millimetric precision and lacks the ability to correct for anatomical deformations due to motion. It justifies direct optical accuracy check and registration correction comparing the adjustment of virtual reference objects segmented from anatomical studies and reality using augmented-reality displays. Once both the virtual environment and reality are perfectly synchronized, relevant target objects or structures at risk may be projected to the surgeon ergonomically using adapted augmented-reality displays. The whole system requires regular anatomical updates acquired using intra-operative imaging.

Modern integrated image-guided surgery assists young surgeons to learn procedures and masters to develop new techniques and better personalize, as well as customize each operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ogihara N, et al. Long-term results of computer-assisted posterior occipitocervical reconstruction. World Neurosurg. 2010;73(6):722–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rampersaud YR, Simon DA, Foley KT. Accuracy requirements for image-guided spinal pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(4):352–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elmi-Terander A, et al. Surgical navigation technology based on augmented reality and integrated 3D intraoperative imaging: a spine cadaveric feasibility and accuracy study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(21):E1303–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. King D. Internal fixation for lumbosacral fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1948;30A(3):560–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C. Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(203):7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Odgers CJt, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement with the assistance of lateral plain radiography. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9(4):334–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalfas IH, et al. Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. J Neurosurg. 1995;83(4):641–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tian W. Robot-assisted posterior C1–2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(Suppl 19):B2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kostrzewski S, et al. Robotic system for cervical spine surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8(2):184–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nottmeier EW, Young PM. Image-guided placement of occipitocervical instrumentation using a reference arc attached to the headholder. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(3 Suppl Operative):138–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guppy KH, Chakrabarti I, Banerjee A. The use of intraoperative navigation for complex upper cervical spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(3):E5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pisapia JM, et al. Navigated odontoid screw placement using the O-arm: technical note and case series. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(1):10–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15(1):11–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mason A, et al. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(2):196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tian NF, et al. Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(6):846–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yukawa Y, et al. Cervical pedicle screw fixation in 100 cases of unstable cervical injuries: pedicle axis views obtained using fluoroscopy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5(6):488–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abumi K, et al. Posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(14):1425–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakashima H, et al. Complications of cervical pedicle screw fixation for nontraumatic lesions: a multicenter study of 84 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(3):238–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Richter M, Cakir B, Schmidt R. Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(20):2280–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kotani Y, et al. Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(3 Suppl):257–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Uehara M, et al. Screw perforation rates in 359 consecutive patients receiving computer-guided pedicle screw insertion along the cervical to lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(11):2858–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tessitore E, et al. Accuracy of freehand fluoroscopy-guided placement of C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws in atlanto-axial instability. Acta Neurochir. 2011;153(7):1417–25; discussion 1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Uehara M, et al. Perforation rates of cervical pedicle screw insertion by disease and vertebral level. Open Orthop J. 2010;4:142–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zou D, et al. Three-dimensional image navigation system-assisted anterior cervical screw fixation for treatment of acute odontoid fracture. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(11):4332–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mendelsohn D, et al. Patient and surgeon radiation exposure during spinal instrumentation using intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation. Spine J. 2016;16(3):343–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Villard J, et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(13):1004–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Nadja Heindl and Valentin Elefteriu for their careful review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Bijlenga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bijlenga, P., Jägersberg, M. (2020). Surgery of the Cranio-Vertebral Junction: Image Guidance, Navigation, and Augmented Reality. In: Tessitore, E., Dehdashti, A., Schonauer, C., Thomé, C. (eds) Surgery of the Cranio-Vertebral Junction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18700-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18700-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18699-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18700-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics