Abstract
Due to the density of essential, small, and mobile structures, mastering the surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral junction may be extremely challenging. Quality and safety of interventions can be improved using navigation. Currently, patient-specific anatomy preparation, surgical planning, intervention, and quality assessment are disconnected actions performed in different conditions and environments and by multiple team members. The whole process needs to be integrated by surgeons performing the intervention. The complexity of the process exposes to errors and degraded precision. It is therefore relevant to develop tools that reduce the need to extrapolate and simplify the information integration and increase the ergonomics of its display.
Imaging information is acquired in the intervention setting to reduce extrapolation using intra-operative imaging. The current point-based registration process of the navigation devices using reference infrared or electromagnetic fiducials provides at best millimetric precision and lacks the ability to correct for anatomical deformations due to motion. It justifies direct optical accuracy check and registration correction comparing the adjustment of virtual reference objects segmented from anatomical studies and reality using augmented-reality displays. Once both the virtual environment and reality are perfectly synchronized, relevant target objects or structures at risk may be projected to the surgeon ergonomically using adapted augmented-reality displays. The whole system requires regular anatomical updates acquired using intra-operative imaging.
Modern integrated image-guided surgery assists young surgeons to learn procedures and masters to develop new techniques and better personalize, as well as customize each operation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ogihara N, et al. Long-term results of computer-assisted posterior occipitocervical reconstruction. World Neurosurg. 2010;73(6):722–8.
Rampersaud YR, Simon DA, Foley KT. Accuracy requirements for image-guided spinal pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(4):352–9.
Elmi-Terander A, et al. Surgical navigation technology based on augmented reality and integrated 3D intraoperative imaging: a spine cadaveric feasibility and accuracy study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(21):E1303–11.
King D. Internal fixation for lumbosacral fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1948;30A(3):560–5.
Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C. Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(203):7–17.
Odgers CJt, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement with the assistance of lateral plain radiography. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9(4):334–8.
Kalfas IH, et al. Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. J Neurosurg. 1995;83(4):641–7.
Tian W. Robot-assisted posterior C1–2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(Suppl 19):B2–5.
Kostrzewski S, et al. Robotic system for cervical spine surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8(2):184–90.
Nottmeier EW, Young PM. Image-guided placement of occipitocervical instrumentation using a reference arc attached to the headholder. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(3 Suppl Operative):138–42.
Guppy KH, Chakrabarti I, Banerjee A. The use of intraoperative navigation for complex upper cervical spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(3):E5.
Pisapia JM, et al. Navigated odontoid screw placement using the O-arm: technical note and case series. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(1):10–8.
Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15(1):11–4.
Mason A, et al. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(2):196–203.
Tian NF, et al. Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(6):846–59.
Yukawa Y, et al. Cervical pedicle screw fixation in 100 cases of unstable cervical injuries: pedicle axis views obtained using fluoroscopy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5(6):488–93.
Abumi K, et al. Posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(14):1425–34.
Nakashima H, et al. Complications of cervical pedicle screw fixation for nontraumatic lesions: a multicenter study of 84 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(3):238–47.
Richter M, Cakir B, Schmidt R. Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(20):2280–7.
Kotani Y, et al. Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(3 Suppl):257–63.
Uehara M, et al. Screw perforation rates in 359 consecutive patients receiving computer-guided pedicle screw insertion along the cervical to lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(11):2858–64.
Tessitore E, et al. Accuracy of freehand fluoroscopy-guided placement of C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws in atlanto-axial instability. Acta Neurochir. 2011;153(7):1417–25; discussion 1425.
Uehara M, et al. Perforation rates of cervical pedicle screw insertion by disease and vertebral level. Open Orthop J. 2010;4:142–6.
Zou D, et al. Three-dimensional image navigation system-assisted anterior cervical screw fixation for treatment of acute odontoid fracture. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(11):4332–6.
Mendelsohn D, et al. Patient and surgeon radiation exposure during spinal instrumentation using intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation. Spine J. 2016;16(3):343–54.
Villard J, et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(13):1004–9.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Nadja Heindl and Valentin Elefteriu for their careful review of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bijlenga, P., Jägersberg, M. (2020). Surgery of the Cranio-Vertebral Junction: Image Guidance, Navigation, and Augmented Reality. In: Tessitore, E., Dehdashti, A., Schonauer, C., Thomé, C. (eds) Surgery of the Cranio-Vertebral Junction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18700-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18700-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18699-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18700-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)