Skip to main content

Endoscopic Transnasal Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Surgery of the Cranio-Vertebral Junction

Abstract

Craniovertebral junction (CVJ) is a complex joint defined by the outer aspect of the foramen magnum, i.e., the occipital condyles and the first two cervical segments, namely the atlas and the axis. It covers and protects the caudal brainstem and rostral spinal cord. CVJ is the most mobile region of the cervical spine, as it permits complex movements providing stability without compromising the traversing neurovascular elements.

Historically, different routes such as anterior, lateral, and posterior approaches were described to access the CVJ and eventually manage diseases involving this area. Anterior approaches include transoral, transoral-transmaxillary, transoral-translabiomandibular, and transfacial routes; lateral access is obtained through the retrosigmoid and the presigmoid/transpetrosal approaches, which may be eventually enlarged with a petrosectomy resulting in an extended transpetrosal approach; finally, posterolateral routes such as suboccipital and the far-lateral approaches should be taken into account. Albeit these routes represent extensive skull base approaches, they provide a thorough kaleidoscope of strategies of accessing the CVJ, especially backing upon the possibility of combining them. In more recent times, the increasing use of the endoscope in transsphenoidal surgery has allowed the endonasal route to be considered for the management of different lesions at the skull base. Indeed, the wider and panoramic view offered by the endoscope along with the refinement of surgical techniques and instrumentations has expanded its applicability to lesions of the CVJ. We herein present the surgical nuances and the related anatomy of the different approaches and of the endoscopic endonasal technique to access the CVJ and manage lesions of this area, aiming to highlight the feasibility and indications of this route and evaluate advantages and limitations, also in regard to the relevant anatomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, de Divitiis O, Messina A, de Divitiis E. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. In: Pickard JD, Akalan N, Di Rocco C, Dolenc VV, Lobo Antunes J, Mooij JJA, Schramm J, Sindou M, editors. Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery. Wien, New York: Springer; 2008. p. 152–99.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cavallo LM, De Divitiis O, Aydin S, Messina A, Esposito F, Iaconetta G, Talat K, Cappabianca P, Tschabitscher M. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the suprasellar area: anatomic considerations—part 1. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:ONS-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cavallo LM, Messina A, Cappabianca P, Esposito F, de Divitiis E, Gardner P, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Esposito F, Becker DP, Villablanca JP, Kelly DF. Endonasal transsphenoidal transclival removal of prepontine epidermoid tumors: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(2 Suppl):E443.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Messina A, Esposito F, Stella L, de Divitiis E, Tschabitscher M. The extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the clivus and cranio-vertebral junction: anatomical study. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23(6):665–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Messina A, Bruno MC, Decq P, Coste A, Cavallo LM, de Divittis E, Cappabianca P, Tschabitscher M. Pure endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy: anatomical study. Neurosurg Rev. 2007;30(3):189–94.. discussion 194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crockard HA. The transoral approach to the base of the brain and upper cervical cord. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985;67(5):321–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Crockard HA, Pozo JL, Ransford AO, Stevens JM, Kendall BE, Essigman WK. Transoral decompression and posterior fusion for rheumatoid atlanto-axial subluxation. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1986;68(3):350–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Perrini P, Benedetto N, Guidi E, Di Lorenzo N. Transoral approach and its superior extensions to the craniovertebral junction malformations: surgical strategies and results. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:ons331. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000334430.25626.DC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perrini P, Benedetto N, Di Lorenzo N. Transoral approach to extradural non-neoplastic lesions of the craniovertebral junction. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156(6):1231–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, de Divitiis E. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: procedure, endoscopic equipment and instrumentation. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20(11–12):796–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cappabianca P, de Divitiis O, Esposito F, Cavallo LM, de Divitiis E. Endoscopic skull base instrumentation. In: Anand VK, Schwartz TH, editors. Practical endoscopic skull base surgery. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2007. p. 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cappabianca P, Esposito F, Cavallo LM, Corriero OV. Instruments. Cranial, craniofacial skull base surgery; 2010. p. 7–15.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Esposito F, Di Rocco F, Zada G, Cinalli G, Schroeder HWS, Mallucci C, Cavallo LM, Decq P, Chiaramonte C, Cappabianca P. Intraventricular and skull base neuroendoscopy in 2012: a global survey of usage patterns and the role of intraoperative neuronavigation. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(6):709–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Divitiis O, Conti A, Angileri FF, Cardali S, La Torre D, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic transoral-transclival approach to the brainstem and surrounding cisternal space: anatomic study. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(1):125–30; discussion 130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Visocchi M, Doglietto F, Della Pepa GM, Esposito G, La Rocca G, Di Rocco C, Maira G, Fernandez E. Endoscope-assisted microsurgical transoral approach to the anterior craniovertebral junction compressive pathologies. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(9):1518–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goel A, Bhatjiwale M, Desai K. Basilar invagination: a study based on 190 surgically treated patients. J Neurosurg. 1998;88(6):962–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Karam YR, Menezes AH, Traynelis VC. Posterolateral approaches to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:A135. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000365828.03949.D0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Menezes AH. Craniocervical developmental anatomy and its implications. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;24(10):1109–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Menezes AH, VanGilder JC. Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the anterior craniocervical junction. Ten-year experience with 72 patients. J Neurosurg. 1988;69(6):895–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smoker WR. Craniovertebral junction: normal anatomy, craniometry, and congenital anomalies. Radiographics. 1994;14(2):255–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smoker WRK, Khanna G. Imaging the craniocervical junction. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;24(10):1123–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Joaquim AF, Appenzeller S. Cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis—a systematic review. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(12):1195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pare MC, Currier BL, Ebersold MJ. Resolution of traumatic hypertrophic periodontoid cicatrix after posterior cervical fusion: case report. Neurosurgery. 1995;37(3):531–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sandhu FA, Pait TG, Benzel E, Henderson FC. Occipitocervical fusion for rheumatoid arthritis using the inside-outside stabilization technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(4):414–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klekamp J. Chiari I malformation with and without basilar invagination: a comparative study. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38(4):E12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Arvin B, Fournier-Gosselin MP, Fehlings MG. Os Odontoideum: etiology and surgical management. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:A22. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000366113.15248.07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Matsui H, Imada K, Tsuji H. Radiographic classification of Os odontoideum and its clinical significance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(15):1706–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vargas TM, Rybicki FJ, Ledbetter SM, MacKenzie JD. Atlantoaxial instability associated with an orthotopic os odontoideum: a multimodality imaging assessment. Emerg Radiol. 2005;11(4):223–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, de Divitiis O, Messina A, de Divitiis E. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. In: Pickard JD, editor. Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery. Wien: Springer-Verlag; 2007. p. 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Iacoangeli M, Gladi M, Alvaro L, Di Rienzo A, Specchia N, Scerrati M. Endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy with anterior C1 arch preservation in elderly patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis. Spine J. 2013;13(5):542–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM. Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg. 2008;108(4):715–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. De Almeida JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA, Kassam AB. Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(2):239–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R. The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(1 Suppl):E213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Aldana PR, Naseri I, La Corte E. The naso-axial line: a new method of accurately predicting the inferior limit of the endoscopic endonasal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:ons308. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318266e488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. La Corte E, Aldana PR, Ferroli P, Greenfield JP, Hartl R, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. The rhinopalatine line as a reliable predictor of the inferior extent of endonasal odontoidectomies. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38(4):E16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. El-Sayed IH, Wu J-C, Ames CP, Balamurali G, Mummaneni PV. Combined transnasal and transoral endoscopic approaches to the craniovertebral junction. J Craniovertebr Junct Spine. 2010;1(1):44–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gladi M, Iacoangeli M, Specchia N, Re M, Dobran M, Alvaro L, Moriconi E, Scerrati M. Endoscopic transnasal odontoid resection to decompress the bulbo-medullary junction: a reliable anterior minimally invasive technique without posterior fusion. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2220-4.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Re M, Iacoangeli M, Di Somma L, Alvaro L, Nasi D, Magliulo G, Gioacchini FM, Fradeani D, Scerrati M. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the craniocervical junction: the importance of anterior C1 arch preservation or its reconstruction. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2016;36(2):107–18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Suchomel P, Stulik J, Klezl Z, Chrobok J, Lukas R, Krbec M, Magerl F. Transarticular fixation of C1-C2: a multicenter retrospective study. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2004;71(1):6–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domenico Solari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Esposito, F. et al. (2020). Endoscopic Transnasal Approach. In: Tessitore, E., Dehdashti, A., Schonauer, C., Thomé, C. (eds) Surgery of the Cranio-Vertebral Junction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18700-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18700-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18699-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18700-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics