Abstract
Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is the main source of sugar in the world, and its ability to produce large amounts of biomass makes this species extremely attractive in a biomass-dependent economy. Leveraged by the oil crisis and by environmental pressure to mitigate the climate change impacts, bioethanol (BE) emerged as a cleaner alternative liquid fuel for internal combustion engines (ICEs). The BE is usually produced via fermentation of sugars, extracted directly from sugarcane sucrose or from preprocessed starch-rich cereals, such as maize, wheat, or rice. Although sugarcane features higher BE yield (L ha−1) and as a promising alternative to mitigate the climate change impacts, its production is posed to a series of challenges and limitations ranging from climate restrictions, land availability, logistics infrastructure, and competitive price. Sugarcane is a perennial grass adapted to tropical and subtropical climates, sensitive to frosts and water shortages, limiting its cultivation in between ±30° latitudes. Yet, in places where the production could be expanded, it is usual to verify the lack of infrastructure for industrial establishment and for rapidly and effectively transporting large amounts of biomass to mills. While the slow progress of second-generation BE is still a constraint, the establishment of electric vehicles in the coming decade can reduce the BE demand. In this scenario, the sugarcane BE industry would have the challenge to share the remained BE market, with other consolidated and new feedstocks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aditiya HB, Mahlia TMI, Chong WT, Nur H, Sebayang AH (2016) Second generation bioethanol production: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 66(1):631–653
Aguilar-Rivera N, Rodríguez LDA, Enríquez RV, Castillo MA, Herrera SA (2012) The Mexican sugarcane industry: overview, constraints, current status and long-term trends. Sugar Tech 14(3):207–222
Alexandrov VA, Hoogenboom G (2000) Vulnerability and adaptation assessments of agricultural crops under climate change in the Southeastern USA. Theor Appl Climatol 67(1):45–63
Associação Nacional dos Fabricantes de Veículos Automotores (2018) Anuário Estatístico. ANFAVEA, Brasilia.
Bae C, Kim J (2017) Alternative fuels for internal combustion engines. Proc Combust Inst 36(3):3389–3413
Barbosa CMG, Terra-Filho M, de Albuquerque ALP et al (2012) Burnt sugarcane harvesting – cardiovascular effects on a group of healthy workers, Brazil. PLoS One 7(1):e46142
Biggs JS, Thorburn PJ, Crimp S et al (2013) Interactions between climate change and sugarcane management systems for improving water quality leaving farms in the Mackay Whitsunday region, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180(1):79–89
Burney JA, Davis SJ, Lobell DB (2010) Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(26):12052–12057
Caldarelli CE, Gilio L (2018) Expansion of the sugarcane industry and its effects on land use in São Paulo: analysis from 2000 through 2015. Land Use Policy 76:264–274
Carpio LGT, Simone de Souza F (2017) Optimal allocation of sugarcane bagasse for producing bioelectricity and second generation ethanol in Brazil: scenarios of cost reductions. Renew Energy 111:771–780
Chum HL, Warner E, Seabra JEA, Macedo IC (2014) A comparison of commercial ethanol production systems from Brazilian sugarcane and US corn. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 8(2):205–223
Cortes-Rodríguez EF, Fukushima NA, Palacios-Bereche R et al (2018) Vinasse concentration and juice evaporation system integrated to the conventional ethanol production process from sugarcane-Heat integration and impacts in cogeneration system. Renew Energy 115:474–488
Crago CL, Khanna M, Barton J et al (2010) Competitiveness of Brazilian sugarcane ethanol compared to US corn ethanol. Energy Policy 38(11):7404–7415
da Costa CC, Guilhoto JJM, de Moraes MAFD (2013) Impactos sociais do aumento de demanda de etanol hidratado versus gasolina C na economia brasileira. In: Encontro da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Ecológica, 9; Encontro Nacional da ECOECO, 9, 2011, Brasília, DF. Anais. Políticas públicas e a perspectiva da economia ecológica. ECOECO, Brasília, DF 2011. não paginado
De Oliveira F, Coelho S (2018) Biodiesel in Brazil should take off with the newly introduced domestic biofuels policy: RenovaBio. In: Biodiesel and biofuels. IntechOpen, London, pp 1–13
de Moraes MAFD, Zilberman D (2014) Production of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: from state intervention to a free market. Springer Science & Business Media, Cham, p 217
Dias De Oliveira ME, Vaughan BE, Rykiel EJ (2005) Ethanol as fuel: energy, carbon dioxide balances, and ecological footprint. Bioscience 55(7):593–602
Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics (2018). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Accessed 1 July 2018
Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D et al (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319(5867):1235–1238
Filoso S, do Carmo JB, Mardegan SF et al (2015) Reassessing the environmental impacts of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil to help meet sustainability goals. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:1847–1856
Garcia-Valle R, Peças Lopes JA (2012) Electric vehicle integration into modern power networks. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, p 321
Ge J, Lei Y, Tokunaga S (2014) Non-grain fuel ethanol expansion and its effects on food security: a computable general equilibrium analysis for China. Energy 65:346–356
Gilio L, de Moraes MAFD (2016) Sugarcane industry’s socioeconomic impact in São Paulo, Brazil: a spatial dynamic panel approach. Energy Econ 58:27–37
Goettemoeller J, Goettemoeller A (2007) Sustainable ethanol: biofuels, biorefineries, cellulosic biomass, flex-fuel vehicles, and sustainable farming for energy independence. Prairie Oak Publishing, Michigan, p 195
Goldemberg J (2007) Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science 315(5813):808–810
Goldemberg J (2013) Sugarcane ethanol: strategies to a successful program in Brazil. In: Lee JW (ed) Advanced biofuels and bioproducts. Springer, New York, pp 13–20
Goldemberg J, Mello FFC, Cerri CEP, Davies CA, Cerri CC (2014) Meeting the global demand for biofuels in 2021 through sustainable land use change policy. Energy Policy 69:14–18
Guo M, Song W, Buhain J (2015) Bioenergy and biofuels: history, status, and perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 42:712–725
Haberl H, Erb K-H, Krausmann F, Running S, Searchinger TD, Smith WK (2013) Bioenergy: how much can we expect for 2050? Environ Res Lett 8:031004
Hamilton JD (2008) Understanding crude oil prices. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, p 42
Hannan MA, Azidin FA, Mohamed A (2014) Hybrid electric vehicles and their challenges: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:135–150
Hess TM, Sumberg J, Biggs T et al (2016) A sweet deal? Sugarcane, water and agricultural transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Environ Chang 39:181–194
Hira A, de Oliveira LG (2009) No substitute for oil? How Brazil developed its ethanol industry. Energy Policy 37:2450–2456
Hoekman SK (2009) Biofuels in the US--challenges and opportunities. Renew Energy 34:14–22
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge
International Energy Agency (2016) Medium-term renewable energy market report 2016. New York
International Energy Agency (2017) Global EV Outlook 2017: two million and counting. New York
Jaiswal D, De Souza AP, Larsen S, LeBauer DS, Miguez FE, Sparovek G, Bollero G, Buckeridge MS, Long SP (2017) Brazilian sugarcane ethanol as an expandable green alternative to crude oil use. Nat Clim Chang 7(11):788
Jambo SA, Abdulla R, Mohd Azhar SH, Marbawi H, Gansau JA, Ravindra P (2016) A review on third generation bioethanol feedstock. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 65:756–769
Khan MT, Seema N, Khan IA, Yasmine S (2017) Applications and potential of sugarcane as an energy crop. In: Agricultural research updates, vol 16. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 1–24
Knox JW, Rodríguez Díaz JA, Nixon DJ, Mkhwanazi M (2010) A preliminary assessment of climate change impacts on sugarcane in Swaziland. Agr Syst 103(2):63–72
Kromer MA, Heywood JB (2009) A comparative assessment of electric propulsion systems in the 2030 US light-duty vehicle fleet. SAE Int J Eng 1(1):372–391
Lamsal K, Jones PC, Thomas BW (2017) Sugarcane harvest logistics in Brazil. Transplant Sci 51(2):771–789
Laurance WF, Sayer J, Cassman KG (2014) Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends Ecol Evol 29(2):107–116
Lepers E, Lambin EF, Janetos AC, DeFries R, Achard F, Ramankutty N, Scholes RJ (2005) A synthesis of information on rapid land-cover change for the period 1981–2000. Bioscience 55(2):115–124
Lobell DB, Cassman KG, Field CB (2009) Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annu Rev Env Resour 34:179–204
Marin FR, Jones JW, Singels A, Royce F, Assad ED, Pellegrino GQ, Justino F (2013) Climate change impacts on sugarcane attainable yield in southern Brazil. Clim Change 117(2):227–239
Marin FR, Martha GB Jr, Cassman KG, Grassini P (2016) Prospects for increasing sugarcane and bioethanol production on existing crop area in Brazil. Bioscience 66(4):307–316
Ma S, Karkee M, Scharf PA, Zhang Q (2014) Sugarcane harvester technology: a critical overview. Appl Eng Agric 30(5):727–739
Milanez AY, Nyko D, Valente MS et al (2015) De promessa a realidade: como o etanol celulósico pode revolucionar a indústria da cana-de-açúcar: uma avaliação do potencial competitivo e sugestões de política pública. BNDES Setorial, Rio de Janeiro 41:237–294
Moore PH, Botha FC (2013) Sugarcane: physiology, biochemistry and functional biology. Wiley, Ames, p 750
Nakata K, Utsumi S, Ota A, Kawatake K, Kawai T, Tsunooka T (2006) The effect of ethanol fuel on a spark ignition engine. SAE technical paper. Toyota Motor Corporation, Warrendale.
Nanaki EA, Xydis GA, Koroneos CJ (2016) Electric vehicle deployment in urban areas. Indoor Built Environ 25(7):1065–1074
Nykvist B, Nilsson M (2015) Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles. Nat Clim Chang 5(4):329
Ohlrogge J, Allen D, Berguson B et al (2009) Energy. Driving on biomass. Science 324(5930):1019–1020
Paraiso ML de S, Gouveia N (2015) Health risks due to pre-harvesting sugarcane burning in São Paulo State, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 18:691–701
Renewable Fuels Association (2017) World fuel ethanol production of 2016. RFA, Washington DC
Rocha FLR, Marziale MHP, Hong O-S (2010) Work and health conditions of sugar cane workers in Brazil. Rev Esc Enferm USP 44(4):978–983
Rodríguez LA, Valencia JJ, Urbano JA (2012) Soil compaction and tires for harvesting and transporting sugarcane. J Terramech 49(4):183–189
Sage RF, Peixoto MM, Sage TL (2014) Photosynthesis in sugarcane. Sugarcane: physiology, biochemistry and functional biology, 1st edn. Wiley, New York, pp 121–149
Scarpare FV, Hernandes TAD, Ruiz-Corrêa ST, Picoli MCA, Scanlon BR, Chagas MF, Duft DG, Cardoso TF (2016) Sugarcane land use and water resources assessment in the expansion area in Brazil. J Clean Prod 133:1318–1327
Scarpare FV, Leal M, Victoria RL (2015) Sugarcane ethanol in Brazil: challenges past, present and future. In: Bioenergy and Latin America: a multi-country perspective. Publications Office of the European Union, Ispra, pp 91–104
Scheiterle L, Ulmer A, Birner R, Pyka A (2018) From commodity-based value chains to biomass-based value webs: the case of sugarcane in Brazil’s bioeconomy. J Clean Prod 172:3851–3863
Sengar K, Sengar R, Lal K, Rao V (2014) Climate change effect on sugarcane productivity. In: Sengar R, Sengar K (eds) Climate change effect on crop productivity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 177–186
Singels A, Jones M, Marin F, Ruane A, Thorburn P (2014) Predicting climate change impacts on sugarcane production at sites in Australia, Brazil and South Africa using the canegro model. Sugar Tech 16(4):347–355
Singh J, Singh AK, Sharma MP, Singh PR, Srivastava AC (2011) Mechanization of sugarcane cultivation in India. Sugar Tech 13(4):310–314
Sissine F (2007). Energy independence and security act of 2007: a summary of major provisions. Library of Congress, Washington, DC, Congressional Research Service
Sozinho DWF, Gallardo ALCF, Duarte CG, Ramos HR, Ruiz MS (2018) Towards strengthening sustainability instruments in the Brazilian sugarcane ethanol sector. J Clean Prod 182:437–454
Srivastava SP, Hancsók J (2014) Alternative fuels. In: Fuels and fuel-additives. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 121–176
Stocker TF (ed) (2014) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
van Ittersum MK, Cassman KG, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P, Hochman Z (2013) Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—a review. Field Crop Res 143:4–17
Vermeulen SJ, Campbell BM, Ingram JSI (2012) Climate change and food systems. Annu Rev Env Resour 37:195–222
Vohra M, Manwar J, Manmode R, Padgilwar S, Patil S (2014) Bioethanol production: feedstock and current technologies. J Environ Chem Eng 2(1):573–584
Walter A, Galdos MV, Scarpare FV, Leal MRLV, Seabra JEA, Cunha MP, Picoli MCA, Oliveira COF (2014) Brazilian sugarcane ethanol: developments so far and challenges for the future. WIREs Energy Environ 3(1):70–92
Acknowledgments
Funding sources include Brazilian Research Council (CNPq grants 301424/2015-2, 401662/2016-0, and 425174/2018-2) and the Research Foundation of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP 2017/20925-0; 2017/50445-0).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marin, F.R., Vianna, M.S., Nassif, D.S.P. (2019). Challenges, Constraints, and Limitations of Cane Biofuels. In: Khan, M., Khan, I. (eds) Sugarcane Biofuels. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18597-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18597-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18596-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18597-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)