Design Cybernetics pp 171-184 | Cite as
Design Cybernetics Enacted: The RSVP Cycles and Devised Theatre
- 180 Downloads
Abstract
In the 1960s, environmental designer, Lawrence Halprin, in collaboration with his wife Ann, choreographer and artistic director of the San Francisco Dance Workshop, engaged in an examination of group creative processes in search of a theory outlining their main features. He formalized his findings in the 1968 book, The RSVP Cycles: Creative Processes in the Human Environment describing a recursive schema of iteration and evaluation bearing striking resemblances to the conversational conception of second-order cybernetics. Devised Theatre is one of the fields that has been most directly influenced by, and most vividly reflects, the work of the Halprins and will serve as the “research site” for this chapter. Highlighting some prevalent features of contemporary Devised Theatre practice through examples drawn from some of the field’s most influential artists, our trip around the cycle will reveal the ways in which the RSVP Cycles reinforce, in a robustly enacted fashion, Ranulph Glanville’s cybernetic conception of design in which lack of control, trans-computable complexity, and under-specification of the problems investigated all become virtues that propel us on a conversational forward search in which we must “act in order to understand” while bound by a deep ethical commitment to the autonomy of others.
Keywords
Performance Theater Collective creation Conversation ConstraintsReferences
- 1.Artaud, A. (1958). The theater and its double. New York, NY: Grove Press.Google Scholar
- 2.Barton, B. (Ed.). (2008). Collective creation, collaboration and devising. Toronto: Playwrights Canada Press.Google Scholar
- 3.Bateson, G. (2002). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
- 4.Bogart, A., & Landau, T. (2014). The viewpoints book: A practical guide to viewpoints and composition. London: Nick Hern Books.Google Scholar
- 5.Bottoms, S. J., & Goulish, M. (2007). Small acts of repair: Performance, ecology, and Goat Island. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 6.Cull, L. (2015). Theatres of immanence: Deleuze and the ethics of performance. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- 7.Cummings, S. T. (2007). Remaking American theatre: Charles Mee, Anne Bogart, and the SITI Company. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 8.Dundjerović, A. S. (2014). The theatricality of Robert Lepage. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
- 9.Fischer, T., & Richards, L. D. (2017). From goal-oriented to constraint-oriented design: The cybernetic intersection of design theory and systems theory. Leonardo, 50(1), 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Frayling, C. (1993/1994). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
- 11.Glanville, R. (2007). Try again. Fail again. Fail better: The cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics. Kybernetes 36(9/10), 1173–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Glanville, R. (2007). Designing complexity. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(2), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Glanville, R. (2009). The black boox vol. III. 39 steps. Vienna: edition echoraum.Google Scholar
- 14.Glanville, R. (2012). Second order cybernetics. The black boox – Vol. I. Cybernetic circles (pp. 175–207). Vienna: edition echoraum. Previously published in: F. Parra-Luna (Ed.), Encyclopedia of life support systems, systems science and cybernetics – Vol. III. Oxford: EoLSS Publishers. Available at: http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c02/e6-46-03-03.pdf. Accessed January 19, 2019.
- 15.Glanville, R. (2014). Cybernetics. Thinking through the technology. In D. P. Arnold (Ed.), Traditions of systems theory. Major figures and contemporary developments (pp. 45–77). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 16.Glanville, R. (2014). When good enough is better than best. Available at Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8GmlNb6EY. Accessed January 19, 2019.
- 17.Glanville, R. (2014). Acting to understand and understanding to act. Kybernetes, 43(9/10), 1293–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Halprin, L. (1968). The RSVP cycles: Creative processes in the human environment. New York, NY: Braziller.Google Scholar
- 19.Heddon, D., & Milling, J. (2006). Devising performance: A critical history. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- 20.Heylighen, F., & Joslyn, C. (2001). Cybernetics and second-order cybernetics. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of physical science & technology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
- 21.Hixson, L. (2004). Small acts of repair. Frakcija (32/35), 02.Google Scholar
- 22.Lehmann, H.-T. (2006). Postdramatic theatre. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kauffman, L. H. (2016). Cybernetics, reflexivity and second-order science. Constructivist Foundations, 11(3), 489–497.Google Scholar
- 24.Knowles, R. (2008). The structures of authenticity: Collective and collaborative creations (excerpts). In B. Barton (Ed.), Collective creation, collaboration and devising (pp. 89–113). Toronto: Playwrights Canada Press.Google Scholar
- 25.Matuszek, K. C. (2015). Ontology, reality and construction in Niklas Luhmann’s theory. Constructivist Foundations, 10(2), 203–210.Google Scholar
- 26.Oddey, A. (1996). Devising theatre: A practical and theoretical handbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 27.Pickering, A. (2011). The cybernetic brain: Sketches of another future. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- 28.Richards, L. D. (2010). The anticommunication imperative. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 17(1/2), 11–24.Google Scholar
- 29.Stravinsky, I. (2003). Poetics of music in the form of six lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 30.von Foerster, H. (2003). Understanding understanding. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar