Advertisement

Design Cybernetics Enacted: The RSVP Cycles and Devised Theatre

  • Tom ScholteEmail author
Chapter
  • 180 Downloads
Part of the Design Research Foundations book series (DERF)

Abstract

In the 1960s, environmental designer, Lawrence Halprin, in collaboration with his wife Ann, choreographer and artistic director of the San Francisco Dance Workshop, engaged in an examination of group creative processes in search of a theory outlining their main features. He formalized his findings in the 1968 book, The RSVP Cycles: Creative Processes in the Human Environment describing a recursive schema of iteration and evaluation bearing striking resemblances to the conversational conception of second-order cybernetics. Devised Theatre is one of the fields that has been most directly influenced by, and most vividly reflects, the work of the Halprins and will serve as the “research site” for this chapter. Highlighting some prevalent features of contemporary Devised Theatre practice through examples drawn from some of the field’s most influential artists, our trip around the cycle will reveal the ways in which the RSVP Cycles reinforce, in a robustly enacted fashion, Ranulph Glanville’s cybernetic conception of design in which lack of control, trans-computable complexity, and under-specification of the problems investigated all become virtues that propel us on a conversational forward search in which we must “act in order to understand” while bound by a deep ethical commitment to the autonomy of others.

Keywords

Performance Theater Collective creation Conversation Constraints 

References

  1. 1.
    Artaud, A. (1958). The theater and its double. New York, NY: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barton, B. (Ed.). (2008). Collective creation, collaboration and devising. Toronto: Playwrights Canada Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bateson, G. (2002). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bogart, A., & Landau, T. (2014). The viewpoints book: A practical guide to viewpoints and composition. London: Nick Hern Books.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bottoms, S. J., & Goulish, M. (2007). Small acts of repair: Performance, ecology, and Goat Island. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cull, L. (2015). Theatres of immanence: Deleuze and the ethics of performance. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cummings, S. T. (2007). Remaking American theatre: Charles Mee, Anne Bogart, and the SITI Company. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dundjerović, A. S. (2014). The theatricality of Robert Lepage. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fischer, T., & Richards, L. D. (2017). From goal-oriented to constraint-oriented design: The cybernetic intersection of design theory and systems theory. Leonardo, 50(1), 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frayling, C. (1993/1994). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glanville, R. (2007). Try again. Fail again. Fail better: The cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics. Kybernetes 36(9/10), 1173–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glanville, R. (2007). Designing complexity. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(2), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glanville, R. (2009). The black boox vol. III. 39 steps. Vienna: edition echoraum.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glanville, R. (2012). Second order cybernetics. The black boox – Vol. I. Cybernetic circles (pp. 175–207). Vienna: edition echoraum. Previously published in: F. Parra-Luna (Ed.), Encyclopedia of life support systems, systems science and cybernetics – Vol. III. Oxford: EoLSS Publishers. Available at: http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c02/e6-46-03-03.pdf. Accessed January 19, 2019.
  15. 15.
    Glanville, R. (2014). Cybernetics. Thinking through the technology. In D. P. Arnold (Ed.), Traditions of systems theory. Major figures and contemporary developments (pp. 45–77). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glanville, R. (2014). When good enough is better than best. Available at Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8GmlNb6EY. Accessed January 19, 2019.
  17. 17.
    Glanville, R. (2014). Acting to understand and understanding to act. Kybernetes, 43(9/10), 1293–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Halprin, L. (1968). The RSVP cycles: Creative processes in the human environment. New York, NY: Braziller.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heddon, D., & Milling, J. (2006). Devising performance: A critical history. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heylighen, F., & Joslyn, C. (2001). Cybernetics and second-order cybernetics. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of physical science & technology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hixson, L. (2004). Small acts of repair. Frakcija (32/35), 02.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lehmann, H.-T. (2006). Postdramatic theatre. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kauffman, L. H. (2016). Cybernetics, reflexivity and second-order science. Constructivist Foundations, 11(3), 489–497.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knowles, R. (2008). The structures of authenticity: Collective and collaborative creations (excerpts). In B. Barton (Ed.), Collective creation, collaboration and devising (pp. 89–113). Toronto: Playwrights Canada Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matuszek, K. C. (2015). Ontology, reality and construction in Niklas Luhmann’s theory. Constructivist Foundations, 10(2), 203–210.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oddey, A. (1996). Devising theatre: A practical and theoretical handbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pickering, A. (2011). The cybernetic brain: Sketches of another future. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Richards, L. D. (2010). The anticommunication imperative. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 17(1/2), 11–24.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stravinsky, I. (2003). Poetics of music in the form of six lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    von Foerster, H. (2003). Understanding understanding. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Theatre and FilmUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations