Advertisement

Cybernetics and Design: Conversations for Action

  • Hugh Dubberly
  • Paul PangaroEmail author
Chapter
First Online:
  • 203 Downloads
Part of the Design Research Foundations book series (DERF)

Abstract

Ranulph Glanville came to believe that cybernetics and design are two sides of the same coin. The authors present their understanding of Glanville and the relationships they see between cybernetics and design. They argue that cybernetics is a necessary foundation for twenty-first century design practice: If design, then systems: Due in part to the rise of computing technology and its role in human communications, the domain of design has expanded from giving form to creating systems that support human interactions; thus, systems literacy becomes a necessary foundation for design. If systems, then cybernetics: Interaction involves goals, feedback, and learning, the science of which is cybernetics. If cybernetics, then second-order cybernetics: Framing wicked problems requires making explicit one’s values and viewpoints, accompanied by the responsibility to justify them with explicit arguments; this incorporates subjectivity and the epistemology of second-order cybernetics. If second-order cybernetics, then conversation: Design grounded in argumentation requires conversations so that participants may understand, agree, and collaborate on effective action – that is, participants in a design conversation learn together in order to act together. The authors see cybernetics as a way of framing both the process of designing and the things being designed – both means and ends – not only design-as-conversation but also design-for-conversation. Second-order cybernetics frames design as conversation, and they explicitly frame “second-order design” as creating possibilities for others to have conversations.

Keywords

Conversation ⋅ Cybernetics ⋅ Design ⋅ Framing ⋅ Glanville ⋅ Interaction ⋅ Learning ⋅ Second-order ⋅ Systems ⋅ Wicked problems 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashby, W. R. (1952). Design for a brain: The origin of adaptive behaviour. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buchanan, R. (1985). Declaration by design: Rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. Design Issues, 2(1), 4–22. Reprinted In V. Margolin (Ed.), Design discourse: History, theory, criticism, 1989 (pp. 91–109). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dourish, P. (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(1), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubberly, H. (2014). The networked platform revolution. Presentation given at IIT Institute for Design, Chicago. Available at: http://presentations.dubberly.com/ID_Networked_Platform.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dubberly, H. (2014). A systems literacy manifesto. Keynote presentation given at relating systems thinking and design RSD3 2014. Published with RSD3 Proceedings. Available at: https://systemic-design.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Hugh_Dubberly_systems_manifesto.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.
  8. 8.
    Dubberly, H., & Paul, P. (2007). Cybernetics and service-craft: Language for behavior-focused design. Kybernetes, 36(9/10), 1153–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dubberly, H., & Pangaro, P. (2009). What is conversation? How do we design for effective conversation? Interactions Magazine July/Aug 2009. Available at: http://www.dubberly.com/articles/what-is-conversation.html. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dubberly, H., Chung, J., Evenson, S., & Pangaro, P. (2009). A model of the creative process. Report commissioned by Institute for the Creative Process, Alberta College of Art Design, Calgary. Available at: http://www.dubberly.com/concept-maps/creative-process.html. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.
  11. 11.
    Forlizzi, J. (2013). Unpublished manuscript, via personal correspondence with the authors.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geoghegan, M. C., & Pangaro, P. (2009). Design for a self-regenerating organization. International Journal of General Systems, 38(2), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerstner, K. (1964). Designing programmes. New York: Hastings House.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glanville, R. (2012). Second order cybernetics. The black boox – vol. I. Cybernetic circles (pp. 175–207). Vienna: edition echoraum. Previously published In F. Parra-Luna (Ed.), Encyclopedia of life support systems, systems science and cybernetics – vol. III. Oxford: EoLSS Publishers. Available at: http://www.pangaro.com/glanville/Glanville-SECOND_ORDER_CYBERNETICS.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.
  15. 15.
    Glanville, R. (2014). How design and cybernetics reflect each other. Keynote presentation given at relating systems thinking and design RSD3 2014. Published with RSD3 Proceedings. Available at: http://systemic-design.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Ranulph_Glanville.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.
  16. 16.
    Glanville, R. (2014). Email correspondence with the authors.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glanville, R. (2014). Audio of keynote presentation at Relating Systems Thinking and Design 2014. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTN_9mJIWNw. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hughes, T. P. (1998). Rescuing prometheus. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Le Corbusier. (1948). Le modulor. First published in English in 1954, Le modulor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maturana, H. R. (1997). Metadesign. In J. Brouwer & C. Hoekendijk (Eds.), Technomorphica (pp. 171–203). Rotterdam: V2 Organisatie. Available at: http://v2.nl/archive/articles/metadesign. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maturana, H. R., & Ximena, D. Y. (2013). Systemic and meta-systemic laws. Interactions Magazine, 20(3), 76–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meadows, D. H., & Wright, D. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Negroponte, N. (1970). The architecture machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Negroponte, N. (1975). Soft architecture machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pangaro, P. (2016). Questions for conversation theory: Conversation theory in one hour. Presentation to the American Society for Cybernetics Annual Conference, Evergreen College, Olympia, Washington, June 2016. Available at: http://pangaro.com/conversation-theory-in-one-hour.html. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.
  27. 27.
    Pangaro, P. (2016). Designing conversations for socially-conscious design. Opening keynote at RSD5 Systemic Design Conference, Toronto, Oct 2016. Available at: http://pangaro.com/rsd5/index.html. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.
  28. 28.
    Pangaro, P. (2017). Conversation is more than interface. Presentation at Interaction 17 Conference. New York: Interaction Design Association. Available at: http://pangaro.com/ixda2017/index.html. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pask, G. (1969). The architectural relevance of cybernetics. Architectural Design, 7(6), 494–496.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pask, G. (1969). The meaning of cybernetics in the behavioural sciences. Reprinted in Proceedings of the First International Congress of Cybernetics (pp. 15–44). London: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pask, G. (1970). A comment, a case history, and a plan. In J. Reichardt (Ed.), Cybernetic serendipity (pp. 76–99). London: Rapp and Carroll. Reprinted in J. Reichardt (Ed.), Cybernetics, art and ideas (pp. 76–99). London: Studio Vista.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pask, G. (1975). Aspects of machine intelligence. In N. Negroponte (Ed.), Soft architecture machines (pp. 6–31). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pask, G. (1976). Conversation theory: Applications in education and epistemology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pickering, A. (2010). The cybernetic brain: Sketches of another future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pickering, A. (2014). Draft for keynote, the next Macy conference: A new synthesis. Prepared for IEEE Conference Norbert Wiener in the 21st century, Boston, June 2014. Shared with the authors.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Protzen, J.-P., & Harris, D. J. (2010). The universe of design: Horst Rittel’s theories of design and planning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Simon, H. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    von Foerster, H. (1984). Disorder/order: Discovery or invention? In P. Livingston (Ed.), Disorder and Order: Proceedings of the Stanford Interaction Symposium (pp. 177–189). Saratoga, Anima Libri. Reprinted in Heinz von Foerster. (2003). Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition (pp. 287–304). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    von Foerster, H., et al. (Eds.). (1950–1957). Cybernetics: Circular causal and feedback mechanisms in biological and social systems: Conference transactions. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Series: 6. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yegge, S. (2011). Yegge’s rant. Available at: https://plus.google.com/+RipRowan/posts/eVeouesvaVX. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dubberly Design OfficeSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Human-Computer Interaction InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options