Skip to main content

Assessment of Habitants’ Thermal Comfort Through Different Treatments of Flat Rooftops in Residential Buildings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2460 Accesses

Part of the book series: Innovative Renewable Energy ((INREE))

Abstract

Among different types of roofs for residential buildings, flat roofs are found to be the most common in the Middle East. Flat roofs are an ancient form mostly used in arid climates and allow the roof space to be used by habitants. However, leaving the rooftop of a high or low building without any treatment against weather fluctuation causes thermal discomfort of the habitants beneath. Rooftops without any other treatment are widely applied in residential building, although habitants strive to find a proper solution based on multiple criteria. This study investigated different alternatives of treatments for flat rooftops in residential buildings against multiple criteria from the case study area of Amman in Jordan. DesignBuilder software for environmental analysis is employed to define the effective rooftop treatment according to the best thermal comfort. It is chosen as it has advantages over other software. This study uses the environmental simulation of five alternative rooftop types in hot arid climate. The five alternatives are rooftop with shed, green rooftop, rooftop with compact insulation, rooftop with tile, and rooftop without any treatment. The criteria used to show the interior spaces thermal comfort by assessment of the thermal performance, heating load, and cooling load in each alternative. Results show that green rooftop achieved the best thermal performance in the interior spaces for the total of heating and cooling loads, but unfortunately the cost of construction and maintenance is too high. However, the second alternative was rooftop with compact insulation with less construction cost, then rooftop with tile. The rooftop with shed showed the highest thermal efficiency only in summer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Madhumathi A, Radhakrishnan S, Priya RS (2014) Sustainable roofs for warm humid climates-a case study in residential buildings in Madurai, Tamilnadu, India. World Appl Sci J 32(6):1167–1180

    Google Scholar 

  2. Qawasmeh B, Al-Salaymeh A, Ma’en SS, Elian N, Zahran N (2017) Energy rating for residential buildings in Amman. Int J Ther Environ Eng 14(2):109–118

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jordan Green Building Guide (2013) Jordan green building guide. The Construction and Sustainable Building Center, Amman

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jayasinghe M, Attalage R, Jayawardena A (2003) Roof orientation, roofing materials and roof surface colour: their influence on indoor thermal comfort in warm humid climates. Energy Sustain Dev 7(1):16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hui D (2006) Benefits and potential applications of green roof systems in Hong Kong. Evaluation 11:12

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dabaieh M, Wanas O, Hegazy MA, Johansson E (2015) Reducing cooling demands in a hot dry climate: a simulation study for non-insulated passive cool roof thermal performance in residential buildings. Energ Buildings 89:142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Theodosiou T (2009) Green roofs in buildings: thermal and environmental behaviour. Adv Build Energy Res 3(1):271–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Semaan M, Pearce A (2016) Assessment of the gains and benefits of green roofs in different climates. Proc Eng 145:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Niachou A, Papakonstantinou K, Santamouris M, Tsangrassoulis A, Mihalakakou G (2001) Analysis of the green roof thermal properties and investigation of its energy performance. Energ Buildings 33(7):719–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrante P, La Gennusa M, Peri G, Scaccianoce G, Sorrentino G (2015) Comparison between conventional and vegetated roof by means of a dynamic simulation. Energy Procedia 78:2917–2922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karzam G (2014) Growing plants on building’s roof is an essential component of green building. Prospec Environ Dev 66. Retrieved from http://www.maan-ctr.org/magazine/article/370/

  12. Kumar V, Mahalle A (2016) Investigation of the thermal performance of green roof in Indian climate. Int J Renew Energy Res 6(2):487–493

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dareeju BSSS, Meegahage JN, Halwatura RU (2010) Indoor thermal performance of green roof in a tropical climate. Int Inst Infra Renew Reconstr, Sri Lanka

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vera S, Pinto C, Victorero F, Bustamante W, Bonilla C, Gironás J, Rojas V (2015) Influence of plant and substrate characteristics of vegetated roofs on a supermarket energy performance located in a semiarid climate. Energy Procedia 78:1171–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Theodosiou TG (2003) Summer period analysis of the performance of a planted roof as a passive cooling technique. Energ Buildings 35(9):909–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dominique M, Tiana RH, Fanomezana RT, Ludovic AA (2014) Thermal behavior of green roof in Reunion Island: contribution towards a net zero building. Energy Procedia 57:1908–1921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gargari C, Bibbiani C, Fantozzi F, Campiotti CA (2016) Environmental impact of Green roofing: the contribute of a green roof to the sustainable use of natural resources in a life cycle approach. Agric Sci Proc 8:646–656

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chenani SB, Lehvävirta S, Häkkinen T (2015) Life cycle assessment of layers of green roofs. J Clean Prod 90:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Curiel-Razo YI, Soto-Zarazúa GM, Rivas-Araiza E, Chavez-Alegria O, Toledano-Ayala M (2011) Thermal behavior in different roof coverings on classrooms. Int J Phys Sci 6(35):7889–7897

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mohamed HI, Lee J, Chang JD (2016) The effect of exterior and interior roof thermal radiation on buildings cooling energy. Procedia Eng 145:987–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. www.weather-and-climate.com. Accessed 20 Jul 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dana K. Amro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Amro, D.K., Ammar, S.M.S. (2020). Assessment of Habitants’ Thermal Comfort Through Different Treatments of Flat Rooftops in Residential Buildings. In: Sayigh, A. (eds) Renewable Energy and Sustainable Buildings. Innovative Renewable Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18488-9_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18488-9_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18487-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18488-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics