Skip to main content

HBA Child Protection and Partnership Working

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Policing UK Honour-Based Abuse Crime
  • 606 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter assesses the efficacy of professional interventions (predominantly police and children’s social care [CSC]) when HBA against children is reported. CSC employ mediation, working agreements and section 20 voluntary arrangements. Moreover, officials attest to making decisions out of deference to victims’ wishes and suggest that perpetrators cooperate with advice imparted during mediation. Yet, these stratagems serve to justify professional decision-making. The impact is that children’s wishes are often overridden; the care system is circumvented; victims are retained with abusers and internal organisational demands are prioritised above children’s best interests. Consequently, despite 64% (14/22) of children being put in police protection (PPP), CSC retained/returned children to risk in 73% (16/22) of cases. The cost of care and extant workloads affect the selective preferences of some professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Predominantly local authority CSC social workers and police officers, and to a lesser extent, housing officers, teachers and healthcare workers.

  2. 2.

    A PPP is a power exercisable by a police officer under section 46 of the Children Act 1989 to remove a child to a place of safety for a period of 72 hours if the child is considered to be at risk of significant harm.

  3. 3.

    Under a section 20 Children Act 1989 arrangement those with parental responsibility voluntarily consent for their child to be accommodated elsewhere for a short period.

  4. 4.

    The 1988 inquiry remit by Butler-Sloss was not set up to establish whether the 121 children had in fact been abused, but to examine how the cases were managed (Channel 4 1997; Richardson and Bacon 2018). However, independent experts have since concluded that at least 70% (93/121) of the original diagnoses were correct (Channel 4 1997).

  5. 5.

    A civil protection order to protect people at risk of being forced into a marriage is made under the Forced Marriage (Civil protection) Act 2007. Breach of a FMPO is now a criminal offence under s120 of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.

  6. 6.

    Exceptions are cases 36 and 74.

  7. 7.

    Cases 13, 18, 20, 26, 32, 43, 44, 45, 50, 74, 93, 94 and 96.

  8. 8.

    Cases 10, 18, 20, 22, 26, 32, 39, 43, 50, 57, 64, 84, 94 and case 44, in which an EPO was instigated by officers on attendance.

  9. 9.

    A court will only make the order if they are satisfied there is reasonable cause to believe that the child is likely to suffer significant harm if the child is not removed to accommodation provided by the local authority, or the child does not remain in the place where he is currently being accommodated, for example, in hospital (Children Act 1989 s.44).

  10. 10.

    Cases 20, 22, 26, 81, 96 and 74.

  11. 11.

    Cases 10, 18, 26, 32, 39, 43, 44, 50, 64, 74, 93, 94 and 96.

  12. 12.

    Evident in only one adult case (case 47).

  13. 13.

    A silo is a system, process or department that operates in isolation from others (English Oxford Living Dictionaries 2019). Silos occur because of how organisations are structured (Beal n.d.).

  14. 14.

    One could argue that DASH has precipitated a similar approach.

  15. 15.

    Police interviews took place in 2016.

  16. 16.

    Cases 69, 70, 74, 43, police officers o, k, h and m.

  17. 17.

    A Domestic Violence Protection Notice (Crime and Security Act 2010) requires the authority of a superintendent. These are useful to apply if the perpetrator is free to return to an address and could put the victim at further risk of harm. This notice, followed by an order made by the magistrate’s court (DVPO), provides the victim with time (14–28 days) to make decisions to consider victim safety such as a restraining order or non-molestation order.

  18. 18.

    This is a quick meeting conducted between agencies, either over the phone or face to face, with little time to schedule a meeting due to the urgency.

  19. 19.

    Before or at the time the order was served by a bailiff, a safety plan and/or PPP should have been considered. The police were only informed when the child had already suffered abuse.

  20. 20.

    Police officers g, j, e, i and p.

  21. 21.

    Police officers b, c, d, e, h, j, k, p.

  22. 22.

    Domestic Abuse, Stalking and Harassment and Honour Based Violence (DASH ) Risk Identification and Assessment and Management Model (2009).

  23. 23.

    Police officers c, g, m; cases 32, 41, 43, 44, 29, 93, 94, 96.

References

  • Action for Children. (2017). Revolving Door part 1: Are vulnerable children being overlooked? [Online]. Retrieved November 22, 2018, from https://www.actionforchildren.org.uk.

  • Beal, V. (n.d.). Information Silo. [Online]. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from www.webopedia.com.

  • Brandon, M., Belderson, P., Warren, C., Howe, D., Gardner, R., Dodsworth, J., & Black, J. (2008). Analysing child deaths and serious injury through abuse and neglect: What can we learn? A biennial analysis of serious case reviews 2003–2005. London: University of East Anglia, Department for Education and Skills (DCSF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Breckenridge, J., & Ralfs, C. (2006). Point of contact for frontline workers responding to children living with domestic violence. In C. Humphries & N. Stanley (Eds.), Domestic violence and child protection: Directions for good practice (pp. 110–123). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst, K., White, S., Fish, S., Munro, E., Fletcher, K., & Lincoln, H. (2010). Ten pitfalls and how to avoid them: What research tells us (pp. 1–41). [Online]. Retrieved January 16, 2017, from www.nspcc.org.uk.

  • Cameron, A., Lart, R., Bostock, L., & Coomber, C. (2012). Factors that promote and hinder joint and integrated working between health and social care services. Social Care Institute for Excellence. Research Briefing 41 (pp. 1–24). [Online]. Retrieved January 21, 2019, from www.scie.org.uk.

  • Channel 4. (1997). The Death of Childhood-Cleveland: Unspeakable Truths. Interesting Film Company for Channel 4, 27 May, 21.00–22.00, Channel 4. [Online]. Retrieved January 5, 2019, from https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com.

  • Children Act 1989 (c.41) [Online]. Retrieved September 1, 2016, from http://www.legislation.gov.uk.

  • Children Act 2004 (c.31) [Online]. Retrieved September 16, 2016, from http://www.legislation.gov.uk.

  • Clapton, G., Cree, V., & Smith, M. (2013). Moral panics, claims-making and child protection in the UK. British Journal of Social Work, 43(4), 803–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland Report. (1988). By Butler Sloss, E. Report of the Inquiry into Child Abuse in Cleveland, 1987. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Social Services by command of Her Majesty, July 1988. Cm. (Series) 412. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • College of Policing. (n.d.). [Online]. Retrieved January 20, 2019, from https://www.college.police.uk.

  • Colwell Report. (1974). Report of the Committee of inquiry into the case and supervision provided in relation to Maria Colwell. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromarty, H., Bellis, A., & Harker, R. (2018). Children’s social care in England. House of Commons Library. [Online]. Retrieved January 16, 2019, from https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk.

  • Cross, T. P., Finkelhor, D., & Ormrod, R. (2005). Police involvement in child protective services investigations: Literature review and secondary data analysis. Child Maltreatment, 10(3), 224–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2013). Data pack: Improving permanence for looked after children. London: TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2017). Characteristics of children in need: 2016 to 2017. Children referred to and assessed by children’s social services for the year ending 31 March 2017. SFR 61/2017, 2 November 2017 [Online]. Retrieved November 22, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government.

  • Department of Health. (1995). Child protection: Messages from research (pp. 1–120). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • English Oxford Living Dictionaries. (2016). [Online]. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/mediation.

  • English Oxford Living Dictionaries. (2019). [Online]. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/silo.

  • Farmer, E., & Lutman, E. (2012). Effective working with neglected children and their families: Linking interventions to long-term outcomes. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, E., Sturgess, W., O’Neill, T., & Wijedasa, D. (2011). Achieving successful returns from care: What makes reunification work? London: BAAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K., & White, S. (2018). Protecting children: A social model. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, D., McCambridge, J., Waissbein, C., & Rollnick, S. (2008). How do child and family social workers talk to parents about child welfare concerns? Child Abuse Review, 17(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrity, R. (1998). Mediation and domestic violence: What domestic violence looks like. [Online]. Retrieved May 5, 2016, from http://www.biscmi.org.

  • Grace, S. (1995). Policing domestic violence in the 1990s. Home Office Research Study No. 139. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanmer, J. (2013 [1989]). Women and policing in Britain. In J. Hanmer, J. Radford, & E. Stanko (Eds.), Women, policing, and male violence: International perspectives (pp. 90–124). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harne, L., & Radford, J. (2008). Tackling domestic violence: Theories, policies and practice. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill; Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HBA and FM Policy and Procedure. (2013). [This anonymised police force].

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC). (2015). The depths of dishonour: Hidden voices and shameful crimes. An inspection of the police response to honour-based violence, forced marriage and female genital mutilation. London: TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2018). Working together to safeguard children: A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. London: TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, L. (2014). Supporting children and families returning home from care: Counting the costs. Loughborough University, Centre for Child and Family Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. (2016, February 24). What do we mean by working in silos? [Online]. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse.

  • Humphreys, C. (2006). Relevant evidence for practice. In C. Humphreys & N. Stanley (Eds.), Domestic violence and child protection: Directions for good practice (pp. 19–35). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, C., & Stanley, N. (2006). Domestic violence and child protection: Directions for good practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iranian and Kurdish Women’s Rights Organisation (IKWRO). (2014). Postcode lottery: Police recording of reported ‘honour’ based violence.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Social Workers. (2002). IFSW manual: Social work and the rights of the child: A professional training manual on the un convention. Münsingen, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Investopedia. (2018, March 21). Silo mentality [Online]. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/silo-mentality.asp.

  • Jones, R. (2014). The story of Baby P: Setting the record straight. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J. (2000). Media templates: Patterns of association and the (re)construction of meaning over time. Media Culture and Society, 22(1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laming, L. (2003). The Victoria Climbie inquiry: Report of an inquiry by Lord Laming (pp. 1–405). London: TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (2010 [1980]). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (Expanded ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, B. (1998). Does family support ensure the protection of children? Messages from child protection research. Child Abuse Review, 7(2), 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London Borough of Brent. (1985). A child in trust: The report of the panel of inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the death of Jasmine Beckford. Wembley, Middlesex: London Borough of Brent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mental Capacity Act 2005: Codes of Practice. (2013, July). UK Department for Constitutional Affairs (pp. 1–301) [Online]. Retrieved January 12, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk.

  • Moore, R., & Hamilton, P. (2016). ‘Silo Mentalities’ and their impact on service delivery in Prison-community transitions: A case study of resettlement provision at a male open prison. The Howard Journal, 55(1–2), 111–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2006). About social workers: A children’s view report. Newcastle upon Tyne: Commission for Social Care Inspection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (1999). Common errors of reasoning in child protection work. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23(8), 745–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report: A child-centred system (pp. 1–173). London: Department for Education, TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC). (2015). Honour-based abuse, forced marriage and female genital mutilation: A policing strategy for England, Wales and Northern Ireland-eradicating honour-based abuse, forced marriage and female genital mutilation together. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC). (2018). National Policing Vulnerability Coordination Centre (VCC) Briefing. [Online]. Retrieved January 20, 2019, from https://whatworks.college.police.uk/Research.

  • National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC). (2015). Achieving positive outcomes for children in relation to return home from care. [Online]. Retrieved November 3, 2016, from https://www.nspcc.org.uk.

  • Ofsted. (2010). The voice of the child: Learning lessons from serious case reviews. A thematic report of Ofsted’s evaluation of serious case reviews from 1 April to 30 September 2010. [Online]. Retrieved October 3, 2016, from http://www.ofsted.gov.uk.

  • Oliver, C. (2010). Children’s views and experiences of their contact with social workers: A focused review of the evidence (pp. 1–39). Leeds: Children’s Workforce Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N. (1991). Governing the family: Child care, child protection and the state. Hampshire: Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c.60). [Online]. Retrieved October 26, 2018, from www.gov.uk/government.

  • Purvis, K. (2018, April 2018). Why are more social work assessments leading to no further action? Community Care. Retrieved November 22, 2018, from https://www.communitycare.co.uk.

  • Radford, L., Blacklock, N., & Iwi, K. (2006). Domestic abuse risk assessment and safety planning in child protection—Assessing perpetrators. In C. Humphries & N. Stanley (Eds.), Domestic violence and child protection: Directions for good practice (pp. 171–189). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, P., & Duncan, S. (2003). Understanding communication in child protection networks. Child Abuse Review, 12, 82–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, P., Duncan, S., & Gray, M. (1993). Beyond blame: Child abuse tragedies revisited. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, S., & Bacon, H. (2018). Child sexual abuse whose problem? Reflections from Cleveland (Rev. ed.). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K., Campbell, G., & Lloyd, G. (2014). Honor-based violence: Policing and prevention (Advances in Police Theory and Practice Series). London: CRC Press; Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2012). Looking beyond domestic violence: Policing coercive control. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 12, 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, N., Miller, P., Foster, H., & Thomson, G. (2011). Children’s experiences of domestic violence: Developing an integrated response from police and child protection services. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(12), 2372–2391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, O. (1976). Some dilemmas in social work education. Oxford Review of Education, 2(2), 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, L. (2015, November 10). Social workers given new guidance for section 20 arrangements amid misuse and abuse. Community care: Children, family justice, fostering and adoption. [Online]. Retrieved October 5, 2016, from http://www.communitycare.co.uk.

  • Taylor, C., & White, S. (2006). Knowledge and reasoning in social work: Educating for humane judgement. British Journal of Social Work, 36(6), 937–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Blueprint Project. (2005). Start with the child, stay with the child: A blueprint for a child-centred approach to children and young people in public care (pp. 1–75). National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • The British Association of Social Workers. (2016). What is social work? [Online]. Retrieved September 1, 2016, from https://www.basw.co.uk.

  • The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (1989). (pp. 1–14). [Online]. Retrieved October 3, 2016, from https://downloads.unicef.org.uk.

  • Thomas, T. (1988, June). The police and social workers: Creativity or conflict? Practice, 2(2), 120–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, K. (2016). Strengthening child protection: Sharing information in multi-agency settings. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Timms, J. E., & Thoburn, J. (2003). Your shout! A survey of the views of 706 children and young people in public care. London: NSPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varano, S., Schafer, J., Cancino, J., & Swatt, M. (2009). Constructing crime: Neighborhood characteristics and police recording behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(6), 553–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J., Biehal, N., Farrelly, N., & Sinclair, I. (2011). Caring for abused and neglected children: Making the right decisions for reunification or long-term care. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H., Skuse, T., & Munro, E. R. (2005, Spring). The best of times, the worst of times. Adoption & Fostering, 29(1), 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, C. (2017). Seeing what is ‘invisible in plain sight’: Policing coercive control. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 00(0), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (c.23). [Online]. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from www.gov.uk/government.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sincere thanks go to Emeritus Professor Terry Thomas for providing helpful insights on an earlier draft of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachael Aplin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aplin, R. (2019). HBA Child Protection and Partnership Working. In: Policing UK Honour-Based Abuse Crime . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18430-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18430-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18429-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18430-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics