Youth Justice: The Impact of Policy on Current Practice

  • Claire Paterson-YoungEmail author
  • Richard Hazenberg
  • Meanu Bajwa-Patel


This chapter will give a brief history of youth justice in England and how the approaches to dealing with children and young people are influenced by the punitive foundations underpinning the youth justice system. By highlighting historical development in youth justice, this chapter explores how the dominance of punishment and justice approaches, combined with perceptions of children and young people as ‘threatening’, has provided the building blocks and foundations for contemporary policy. Furthermore, we will explore the impacts of contemporary policy (founded on punitive principles) on current practice. The highlighting of this societal driven punitive approach is central to the arguments presented in the book, as it demonstrates how current policy and practice in the youth justice field is not focused on the young person, but on the perceived needs of wider society. This approach severely limits positive outcomes for young people both in terms of recidivism and wider life chances.


Youth justice Secure Training Centre Recidivism Justice Welfare 


  1. Audit Commission. (1996). Misspent Youth: Young People and Crime Summary. London: Audit Commission.Google Scholar
  2. Audit Commission. (1998). Misspent Youth ’98 – The Challenge for Youth Justice. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from
  3. Bateman, T. (2017). The State of Youth Justice 2017 – An Overview of Trends and Developments. National Association for Youth Justice – Justice for Children in Trouble.Google Scholar
  4. Bateman, T., & Hazel, N. (2014). Youth Justice Timeline. Retrieved June 5, 2016, from
  5. BBC. (2016). Teenage Prison Abuse Exposed. Retrieved September 12, 2016, from
  6. Case, S. (2018). Youth Justice: A Critical Introduction. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. A., Mannarino, A. P., & Deblinger, E. (2017). Treating Trauma and Traumatic Grief in Children and Adolescents (2nd ed.). London: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Department of Education. (2017). Children Accommodated in Secure Children’s Homes at 31 March 2017: England and Wales. SFR 23/2017.Google Scholar
  9. Goldson, B. (2002). Children, Crime and the State. In B. Goldson, M. Lavalette, & J. McKechnie (Eds.), Children, Welfare and the State. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Graham, J., & Moore, C. (2008). Beyond Welfare Versus Justice: Juvenile Justice England and Wales. In J. Junger-Tas & S. H. Decker (Eds.), International Handbook of Juvenile Justice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Hendrick, H. (1997). Constructions and Reconstructions of British Childhood: An Interpretative Survey, 1800 to the Present. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood (pp. 33–60). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Hendrick, H. (2006). Histories of Youth Crime and Justice. In B. Goldson & J. Muncie (Eds.), Youth Crime and Justice. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Holt, S., Buckley, H., & Whelan, S. (2008). The Impact of Exposure to Domestic Violence on Children and Young People: A Review of the Literature. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32(8), 797–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitzmann, K., Gaylord, N., Holt, A., & Kenney, E. (2003). Child Witnesses to Domestic Violence: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(2), 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawson, K. M., Back, S. E., Hartwell, K. J., Maria, M. M., & Brady, K. T. (2013). A Comparison of Trauma Profiles among Individuals with Prescription Opioid, Nicotine, or Cocaine Dependence. The American Journal on Addictions, 22(2), 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ministry of Justice. (2010). Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  17. Muncie, J. (2009). Youth and Crime (3rd ed.). Oxford: Sage Publication Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. Muncie, J. (2015). Youth and Crime (4th ed.). Oxford: Sage Publication Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Muncie, J., Hughes, G., & McLaughlin, E. (2002). Youth Justice: Critical Reading. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Paterson-Young, C. (2018). ‘Inspiring Futures’ – How Social Impact Measurement as a Form of Organisational Performance Management Can Enhance Outcomes for Young People in Custody. PhD Thesis, University of Northampton.Google Scholar
  21. Paterson-Young, C., Hazenberg, R., Bajwa-Patel, M., & Denny, S. (2017). Developing a Social Impact Measurement Framework to Enhance Outcomes for Young People in Custody—What to Measure? British Society of Criminology – Conference 2017.Google Scholar
  22. Pearson, G. (1983). Hooligan: A History of Respectable Fears. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pitts, J. (2001). The New Politics of Youth Crime: Discipline or Solidarity. Dorset: Russell House Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. STC. (1998). Rules [Online]. Retrieved June 8, 2016, from
  25. Taylor, C. (2016). Review of the Youth Justice System in England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice, The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2016) Education in Youth Custody. Post note: 524.Google Scholar
  26. The Lammy Review. (2017). An Independent Review into the Treatment of, and Outcomes for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic individuals in the Criminal Justice System. Retrieved June 26, 2018, from
  27. Youth Justice Board. (2011). Youth Justice Statistics 2009/10 – England and Wales. London: Youth Justice Board.Google Scholar
  28. Youth Justice Board. (2014a). Deaths of Children in Custody: Action Take, Lessons Learnt. London: Youth Justice Board.Google Scholar
  29. Youth Justice Board. (2014b). AssetPlus Model Document. London: Youth Justice Board.Google Scholar
  30. Youth Justice Board. (2015a). Youth Justice Statistics 2013/2014. London: Youth Justice Board.Google Scholar
  31. Youth Justice Board. (2015b). Youth Offending Teams: Making the Difference for Young People, Victims and Communities. London: Youth Justice Board.Google Scholar
  32. Youth Justice Board. (2018). Youth Justice Statistics 2016/2017. London: Youth Justice Board.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claire Paterson-Young
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard Hazenberg
    • 1
  • Meanu Bajwa-Patel
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NorthamptonNorthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations