Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice ((PAHSEP,volume 20))

Abstract

A just society is not a static given. The problematic of injustice continually provokes renewed efforts for individuals and societies; for theorists, educators, political activists, and for all those who strive for a more just world. Betty Reardon and Rainer Forst are two leading thinkers who have devoted their work to conceiving of justice as dynamic, morally based, critical, and relational. Each is deeply concerned with how to challenge injustice, especially as it is replicated in the structures of thinking, invalid justifications in communication, and invalid societal narratives.

Janet Gerson, Education Director, International Institute on Peace Education, New York, NY; Email: gerson@i-i-p-e.org.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thanks to Frank Brodhead for making this point on noumenal power and domination.

  2. 2.

    “The International Institute on Peace Education (IIPE) is a weeklong residential experience for educators. IIPE is at various universities and peace centers throughout the world. IIPE facilitates exchanges of theory and practical experiences in teaching peace education and serves to grow the field. In serving the field, the IIPE operates as an applied peace education laboratory that provides a space for pedagogical experimentation; cooperative, deep inquiry into shared issues; and advancing theoretical, practical and pedagogical applications…in its intensive residentially based learning community.” Retrieved November 29, 2018, from https://www.i-i-p-e.org/about/ (As Education Director of IIPE and as co-author of this text, I have somewhat rearranged this text for clarity here).

References

  • Albright, M. (2018). Fascism: A warning. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, A. (2014). The power of justification. In R. Forst (Ed.), Justice, democracy and the right to justification: In dialogue (pp. 65–86). London: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P., & Duvall, J. A. (2001). A force more powerful: A century of nom-violent conflict. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal, A. (2002). Games for actors and non-actors (2nd ed., A. Jackson, Trans.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S., Raider, E., & Gerson, J. (2006). Teaching conflict resolution skills in a workshop. In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.), Handbook of conflict resolution (2nd ed., pp. 695–725). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, J, G., & Freyenhagen, F. (2013). Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the political. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2012). The right to justification: Elements of a constructivist theory of justice (J. Flynn, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2013). Justification and critique: Toward a critical theory of politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2014). Justice, democracy and the right to justification: In dialogue. London: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2017). Normativity and power: Analyzing social orders of justification (C. Cronin, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, J. C. (in press). Reclaiming common bases of human dignity: Honoring Evelin Lindner. Lake Oswego, OR: World Dignity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, J. C. (2013). Democratizing global justice: The world tribunal on Iraq, 7(2), 86–112. http://www.infactispax.org/journal.

  • Gerson, J. C. (2014). Public deliberation on global justice: The world tribunal on Iraq. Doctoral dissertation. New York: Teachers College Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, J., Snauwaert, D., & Warnke, J. (2018, September 29). Rethinking power & democracy in destructive times. Peace & Justice Studies Association Conference, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action, volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. A. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). Theory of communicative action, volume two: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (T. A. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger with F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). Moral consciousness and communicative action (C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1998). The pragmatics of communication. Edited by Maeve Cooke. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laden, A. S. (2014). The practice of equality. In R. Forst (Ed.), Justice, democracy and the right to justification: In dialogue (pp. 102–126). London: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, N. (2017). Democracy in chains: The deep history of radical rights. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raider, E., Coleman, S., & Gerson, J. (2000). Teaching conflict resolution skills in a workshop. In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 499–521). San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1992). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. A. (1988a). Comprehensive peace education: Educating for global responsibility (p. x). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. A. (1988b). Educating for global responsibility: Teacher-designed curricula for peace education, K-12. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B, A., & Nordland, E. (1994). Learning peace: The promise of ecological and cooperative education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. A. (1995). Educating for human dignity: Learning about rights and responsibilities. Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. A. (1996). Sexism and the war system. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. A. (1999). Peace education: A review and projection. Sweden: School of Education, Malmo University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. A. (2001). Educating for a culture of peace in a gender perspective. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. A. (2013). Meditating on the barricades: Concerns, cautions and possibilities for peace education for political efficacy. Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. A., & Cabezudo, A. (2001). Learning to abolish war: Teaching toward a culture of peace. Retrieved December 3, 2018, from http://www.peace-ed-campaign.org/learning-to-abolish-war-teaching-toward-a-culture-of-peace/.

  • Reardon, B. A., & Snauwaert, D. T. (2011). Reflective pedagogy, cosmopolitanism, and critical peace education for political efficacy: A discussion of Betty A. Reardon’s assessment of the field. In Factis Pax, 5(1), 1–14. http://www.infactispax.org/journal/.

  • Reardon, B. A., & Snauwaert, D. T. (2015a). Betty A. Reardon: A pioneer in education for peace and human rights. SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. A., & Snauwaert, D. T. (2015b). Key texts in gender and peace. SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. M. (2000). What we owe each other. Cambridge, MA: Belkamp Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, G. (1973). The politics of nonviolence: Three volume set. Manchester, NH: Extending Horizons Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, G. (2003). There are realistic alternatives. Boston, MA: The Albert Einstein Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, G. (2012). From Dictatorship to democracy: A conceptual framework for liberation. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snauwaert, D. T. (2010). Democracy as public deliberation and the psychology of epistemological world views and moral reasoning: A philosophical reflection. In Factus Pax, 4(1), 120–126. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from http://www.infactispax.org/journal/.

  • Snauwaert, D. T. (2011, November). Democracy, public reason, and peace education. Global Campaign for Peace Education Newsletter (88). http://www.peace-edcampaign.org/newsletter/archives/88.html.

  • Snauwaert, D. T. (2012, November). Betty Reardon’s conception of “peace” and its implications for a philosophy of peace education. Peace Studies Journal, 5(3). Retrieved November 24, 2018, from www.researchgate.net/publication/233907030_Betty_Reardon’s_Conception_of_Peace_and_its_Implications_for_a_Philosophy_of_Peace_Education/download.

  • Snauwaert, D. T. (2018a, May 15). Power and a sustainable just peace: A response to Reardon’s “On Frameworks and Purposes—Patriarchy is the Problem”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snauwaert, D. (2018b, September 29). Revolutionary nonviolence and Rainer Forst’s critical theory of justice. Presentation, Peace and Justice Studies Association Conference, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. (2018). How fascism works: The politics of us and them. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Synder, T. (2017). On Tyranny: Twenty lessons from the twentieth century. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commission. (1984). Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Retrieved February 18, 2019, from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cat.aspx.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet Gerson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gerson, J. (2019). Toward a Just Society: An Account. In: Snauwaert, D. (eds) Exploring Betty A. Reardon’s Perspective on Peace Education. Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18387-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics