Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Technical Efficiency of Organic Herbs: The Case of Egypt

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Waste Management in MENA Regions

Part of the book series: Springer Water ((SPWA))

  • 1267 Accesses

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency ratings of organic and conventional herbs and spices farms in the Egyptian delta. To do so, we use stochastic production frontier (SPF) analysis with a Cobb–Douglas stochastic frontier model as a functional form specification for the data. Additionally, we study the factors affecting technical efficiency scores reflecting farmer and farm characteristics (i.e., farmer experience, type of soil and irrigation, location in different governorates as an indicator of being located in a less favored area). Computing output elasticity of different inputs assesses productivity differences between both agricultural practices. The analysis adopts cross-sectional, farm-level data collected from a random sample of 232 (135 organic and 97 conventional) farms that specialize in herbs and spices. Output elasticities of different inputs show that organic farms exhibit higher output elasticities than conventional farms. Labor and area are found to be the most productive factors in organic farming. Organic farmers, on average, are more technically efficient than their conventional counterparts (efficiency ratings are approximately 0.75 and 0.91, respectively). Hence, the results suggest that, by using available resources more efficiently and without changing current technology, organic (conventional) farms can increase their output by about 9% (25%). Concerning the factors influencing technical efficiency, they are found to be relevant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Egyptian Center of Organic Agriculture (ECOA) is a domestic certification body for different types of organic farming certifications.

References

  1. Aigner D, Lovell C, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production functions models. J Econ 6(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldanondo-Ochoa AM, Casasnovas-Oliva VL, Arandia-Miura A (2014) Environmental efficiency and the impact of regulation in dryland organic vine production. Land Use Policy 36:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Battese GE (1992) Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: a survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics. Agric Econ 7:185–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Battese G, Coelli T (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. J Econ 148(1):36–45

    Google Scholar 

  5. Battese GE, Corra GS (1977) Estimation of a production frontier model: with application to the pastoral zone of Eastern Australia. Aust J Agric Econ 21:169–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Battese GE, Rao DSP, O’Donnell C (2004) A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. J Prod Anal 21:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beltrán-Esteve M, Reig-Martinez E, Estruch-Guitart V (2017) Assessing eco efficiency: a metafrontier directional distance function approach using life cycle analysis. Environ Impact Assess Rev 63:116–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beltrán-Esteve M, Reig-Martínez E (2014) Comparing conventional and organic citrus grower efficiency in Spain. Agric Syst 129:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Breustedt G, Latacz-Lohmann U, Tiedemann T (2011) Organic or conventional? optimal dairy farming technology under the EU milk quota system and organic subsidies. Food Policy 36:223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brümmer B (2001) Stochastic Frontier Analysis using SFAMB for Ox, Manual f\”ur sfamb ed. Department of Agricultural Economics, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, D-24118 Kiel

    Google Scholar 

  11. Centre for the promotion of imports from developing countries (CBI) 2015. CBI trade statistics spices and herbs. Retrieved from https://www.cbi.eu/sites/default/files/trade-statistics-europe-spices-herbs-2015.pdf. Accessed on 21 Oct 2018

  12. Coelli TJ, Prasada Rao DS, Battese GE (1998) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Coelli TJ, Prasada Rao DS, O’donnell C, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiencyand productivity analysis, 2nd edn. Springer Science, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19(3):273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Egypt H&S Market Research Report (2018) Egypt herbs & spices market research report—by type (Herbs and Spices) packaging materials (plastic, paper, and others) distribution channel (store based, and non-store based)—forecast till 2023. Available at: https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/egypt-herbs-spices-market-6327

  16. Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc 120(3):253–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. FiBL and IFOAM (2016) The world of organic agriculture, statistics and emerging trends 2016. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse, Switzerland and International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn, Germany. Retrieved from https://shop.fibl.org/chen/mwdownloads/download/link/id/747/. Accessed on 15 Oct 2018

  18. FiBL and IFOAM (2018) The World of Organic Agriculture, statistics and emerging trends 2081. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse, Switzerland and International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn, Germany. Retrieved from https://shop.fibl.org/CHen/mwdownloads/download/link/id/1093/?ref=1. Accessed on 15 Oct 2018

  19. Flubacher M (2015) Comparison of the economic performance between organic and conventional dairy farms in the swiss mountain region using matching and stochastic frontier analysis. J Socio-Econ Agric 8:76–84

    Google Scholar 

  20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018). FAOSTAT statistics database. [Rome]: FAO

    Google Scholar 

  21. Färe R, Lovell CAK (1978) Measuring the technical efficiency of production. J Econ Theory 19(1):150–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guesmi B, Serra T, Kalla Z, Gil JM (2012) The productive efficiency of organic farming: the case of grape sector in Catalonia. Spanish J Agric Res 10:552–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guesmi B, Serra T, Radwan A, Gil JM (2018) Efficiency of Egyptian organic agriculture: a local maximum likelihood approach. Agribusiness Int J 34:441–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gutierrez E, Aguilera E, Lozano S, Guzman GI (2017) A two-stage DEA approach for quantifying and analysing the inefficiency of conventional and organic rain-fed cereals in Spain. J Clean Prod 149:335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Häring AM, Dabbert S, Aurbacher J, Bichler B, Eichert C, Gambelli D, Lampkin N, Offermann F, Olmos S, Tuson J, Zanoli R (2004) Organic farming and measures of European agricultural policy. In: Dabbert S (ed) Organic farming in Europe: economics and policy, vol 11. Stuttgart: department of farm economics, university of Stuttgart-Hohenheim, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  26. IMC, Industerial Modernisation Centre, (2006) Herbs and spices, global review, local assessment, SWOT analysis. Available at: http://www.imc-egypt.org/index.php/en/studies/viewdownload/95-full-study/63-herbsspices-survey-part-1-en

  27. Kantelhardt J, Eckstein K, Hoffmann H (2009) Assessing programmes for the provision of agri-environmental services—an efficiency analysis realized in Southern Germany. In: Paper presented at the conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE), Beijing, China, 16–22 Aug

    Google Scholar 

  28. Karagiannis G, Salhofer K, Sinabell F (2012) Scale efficiency in organic and conventional dairy farming. In: Paper presented at the conference of the associazione italiana di economia agraria e applicata (AIEAA), Trento, Italy, 4–5 June

    Google Scholar 

  29. Koopmans TC (1951) An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kumbhakar SC, Tsionas EG, Sipiläinen T (2009) Joint estimation of technology choice and technical efficiency: an application to organic and conventional dairy farming. J Prod Anal 31:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumbhakar S, Lovell C (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(2): 532–532

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kumbhakar SC, Byeong UP, Simar L, Tsionas EG (2007) Nonparametric stochastic frontiers: a local maximum likelihood approach. J Econom 137:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lakner S, Breustedt G (2017) Efficiency analysis of organic farming systems—a review of concepts, topics, results and conclusions. German Journal of Agricultural Economics

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mayen CD, Balagtas JV, Alexander CE (2010) Technology adoption and technical efficiency: organic and conventional dairy farms in the United States. Am J Agr Econ 92:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Meeusen W, Van Den Broek J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 18(2):435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nehring R, Gillespie J, Hallahan C, Sauer J (2012) Economic efficiency of U.S. organic versus conventional dairy farms: evidence from 2005 and 2010. In: Paper presented at the conference of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA), Birmingham, Alabama, USA, 4–7 Feb

    Google Scholar 

  37. Offermann F, Nieberg H (2001) Economic performance of organic farms in selected European countries: situation, development and determinants. German J Agric Econ 50:421–427

    Google Scholar 

  38. Oude Lansink A, Pietola KS, Backman S (2002) Efficiency and productivity of conventional and organic farms in Finland 1994-1997. Eur Rev Agric Econ 29:51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Donnell CJ, Rao DSP, Battese GE (2008) Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical Economics 34:231–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Poudel DD, Horwath WR, Temple WT, Bruggen AHCV (2002) Comparison of soil N availability and leaching potential, crop yields and weeds in organic, low-Input and conventional farming systems in Northern California. Agr Ecosyst Environ 90:125–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sallam W, Shelaby AA (2011) Value chain analysis for the Egyptian herbs and spices sub-sector: modeling and estimating export potential. J Am Sci 7(12):565–578

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sedek E, Shelaby AA (2011) Organic agriculture in Egypt: production economics and challenges (a case study of fayoum governorate). J Am Sci 7(9):208–215

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sipiläinen T, Huhtala A (2013) Opportunity costs of providing crop diversity in organic and conventional farming: would targeted environmental policies make economic sense? Eur Rev Agric Econ 40:441–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sutherland LA, Gabriel D, Hathaway-Jenkins L, Pascual U, Schmutz U, Rigby D, Godwin R, Sait SM, Sakrabani R, Kunin WE, Benton TG, Stagl S (2012) The ‘Neighbourhood Effect’: a multidisciplinary assessment of the case for farmer co-ordination in agri-environmental programmes. Land Use Policy 29:502–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tiedemann T, Latacz-Lohmann U (2013) Production risk and technical efficiency in organic and conventional agriculture—the case of arable farms in Germany. J Agric Econ 64:73–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tzouvelekas V, Pantzios CJ, Fotopoulos C (2001) Technical efficiency of alternative farming systems: the case of Greek organic and conventional olive-growing farms. Food Policy 26:549–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Economics, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Fadi Abdelradi

Authors
  1. Fadi Abdelradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fadi Abdelradi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water and Water Structures Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Abdelazim M Negm

  2. Ludwigshafen, Germany

    Noama Shareef

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abdelradi, F. (2020). The Technical Efficiency of Organic Herbs: The Case of Egypt. In: Negm, A., Shareef, N. (eds) Waste Management in MENA Regions. Springer Water. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18350-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation