Abstract
In 2012, the U.S. oil and gas industry produced approximately 3.4 × 109 cubic meters (m3) of water, equivalent to 9.1 × 106 m3 per day and greater than six times the amount of water treated by the City of Houston, Texas. This “produced water” consists of drilling or completion fluids that exit a well shortly after it is brought into production, along with water occurring naturally in the rock formation that exits with the oil and/or gas. Produced water can be contaminated by hydrocarbons, metals, radioactive material, and salts, which can make recycling and disposal difficult. In this chapter, we will discuss two aspects of produced water handling—regulation and technology—specifically focusing on five U.S. regions—the Permian, Eagle Ford, Bakken, Marcellus, and Niobrara. We will explore various disposal practices used in each region and consider how the regulatory framework influences those practices. The focus will be on regulations in six states – Texas, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, and Wyoming – with jurisdiction over the above regions. Just as the regions have remarkably different geology, and therefore different quality of produced water, these six states also have different regulatory frameworks. To illustrate these differences, we undertake a detailed exploration of the regulations in Texas and Pennsylvania and compare other states’ regulations where appropriate. The analysis highlights the complexity of produced water regulation, treatment, and disposal within the United States.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A water’s pH is an indicator of its acidity. Water with a lower pH value is acidic, while water with a higher pH value is basic. Neutral pH is 7.0. For reference, lemon juice has a pH of about 2, while an ammonia solution has a pH of about 11.
- 2.
TSS can be expressed using the unit “mg/L” referring to milligrams per liter. Therefore, there may be as much as 1000 mg or 1 g of suspended solid particles in 1 liter of produced water.
- 3.
Section 2(27) of the RCRA (42 U.S.C. § 6903(27)) defines “solid waste” to mean any “discarded material, including solid, liquid, semisolid, or contained gaseous material resulting from industrial, commercial, mining, and agricultural operations, and from community activities.”
- 4.
The term “other wastes” encompasses waste material intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with oil and gas exploration, development, or production, such as materials produced from a well in conjunction with oil or gas (EPA 2002).
- 5.
The Director may issue a permit on an area basis, rather than for each well individually, in certain circumstances (40 C.F.R. § 144.33).
- 6.
Uncontaminated storm water discharges associated with oil and gas construction and field operation activities are exempt from the permitting requirements in the Clean Water Act (Kundis Craig 2013).
- 7.
Permits issued under the NPDES Program include limits on the maximum concentration of pollutants in the discharge, which are set based on the available treatment technologies, as well as the desired quality of the receiving water. Procedures for establishing those limits are set out in regulations adopted under the Clean Water Act (40 C.F.R. Pt. 131).
- 8.
The 98th meridian runs through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.
- 9.
“Onshore facilities” are those located landward of the inner boundary of the territorial sea (40 C.F.R. § 435.30).
- 10.
Clean Water Act regulations define “pass-through” as occurring where a pollutant is not removed through treatment at the POTW (40 C.F.R. § 403.3(p)).
- 11.
Clean Water Act regulations define “interference” as occurring where a pollutant inhibits or disrupts the POTW, its treatment processes or operations, or its sludge processes, use, or disposal, resulting in a violation of the POTW’s NPDES permit, or certain statutory provisions (40 C.F.R. § 403.3(k)).
- 12.
VOCs include benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene.
- 13.
The density of a material is its mass divided by its volume. For example, water has a density of approximately 1 g/cm3.
- 14.
The specific gravity of a material is its density divided by the density of a reference material. The reference material often used for solids and liquids is water.
- 15.
The PDEP is authorized to issue general permits under 25 Pa. Code § 287.612.
- 16.
Oil and gas liquid waste is defined to include “liquid wastes from the drilling, development and operation of oil and gas wells and transmission facilities” (PDEP 2012, p. 2).
References
American Petroleum Institute (API) (1988) Production waste survey. American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, DC
Ashaghi SK, Ebrahimi M, Czermak P (2007) Ceramic ultra- and nanofiltration membranes for oilfield produced water treatment: a mini review. Open Environ Sci 1:1–8
Blondes MS, Gans KD, Rowan EL, Thordsen JJ, Reidy ME, Engle MA, Kharaka YK, Thomas B (2016) U.S. Geological survey national produced waters geochemical database v2.2 (PROVISIONAL). Available at: https://energy.usgs.gov/EnvironmentalAspects/EnvironmentalAspectsofEnergyProductionandUse/ProducedWaters.aspx#3822349-data. Accessed 13 Jan 2016
Boyd D (2015) Water management: recycling, treating practices enable operators to conserve freshwater supply resources. The American Oil and Gas Reporter. Available at: http://www.aogr.com/magazine/cover-story/recycling-treating-practices-enable-operators-to-conserve-freshwater-supply
Clark CE, Veil JA (2009) Produced water volumes and management practices in the United States (No. ANL/EVS/R-09-1). Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Washington, DC
Coday BD, Xu P, Beaudry EG, Herron J, Lampi K, Hancock NT, Cath TY (2014) The sweet spot of forward osmosis: treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams. Desalination 333(1):23–35
Cook M, Huber K, Webber M (2015) Who regulates it? Water policy and hydraulic fracturing in Texas. Texas Water J 6(1):45–63
Duong HC, Chivas AR, Nelemans B, Duke M, Gray S, Cath TY, Nghiem LD (2015) Treatment of RO brine from CSG produced water by spiral-wound air gap membrane distillation—a pilot study. Desalination 366:121–129
EPA (1987) Management of waste from exploration, development and production of crude oil, natural gas, and geothermal energy: EPA530-SW-88-003. Available at: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=9100WI1P.TXT
EPA (2002) Exemption of oil and gas exploration and production wastes from federal hazardous waste regulations: EPA530-K-01-004. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/oil-gas.pdf
EPA (2015) Assessment of the potential impact of hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas on drinking water resources. Available at: http://ofmpub.epa.gov/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=523539
EPA (2016a) Class II oil and gas related injection wells. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/uic/class-ii-oil-and-gas-related-injection-wells. Accessed 22 Jan 2017
EPA (2016b) General information about injection wells. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/uic/general-information-about-injection-wells. Accessed 22 Jan 2017
Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, Biak DR, Madaeni SS, Abidin ZZ (2009) Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater 170(2–3):530–551
Federal Water Pollution Control Act; 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq
Fipps G (2016) Irrigation water quality standards and salinity management. Texas A&M University, AgriLife Extension. Available at: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu/publications/B-1667.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2017
Hayes T, Arthur D (2004) Overview of emerging produced water treatment technologies. In: The 11th annual international petroleum environmental conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Higgens SF, Agouridis CT, Gumbert AA (2016) Drinking water quality guidelines for Cattle. University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service. Available at: http://www2.ca.uky.edu/agcomm/pubs/id/id170/id170.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2017
Igunno ET, Chen GZ (2014) Produced water treatment technologies. Int J Low Carbon Technol Adv Access 9:157–177
Kundis Craig R (2013) Hydraulic fracturing (fracking), federalism, and the water-energy Nexus. Idaho Law Review 49:241–264
Mantell ME (2011) Produced water reuse and recycling challenges and opportunities across major Shale plays. Available at: www.epa.gove/sites/production/files/documents/09_Mantell_-Reuse_508.pdf
Midland Reporter Telegram (2015) Permian basin drillers lead the way in water recycling push. Available at: http://www.mrt.com/business/energy/article/Permian-Basin-drillers-lead-the-way-in-water-7402392.php
Nicot J (2013) Hydraulic fracturing and water resources: a Texas study. Gulf Coast Assoc Geol Soc Trans 63:359–368
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PDEP) (2012) General permit WMGR123 processing and beneficial use of oil and gas waste. Available at: http://files.dep.state.pa.us/Waste/Bureau%20of%20Waste%20Management/WasteMgtPortalFiles/SolidWaste/Residual_Waste/GP/WMGR123.pdf
Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) (2016) Recycling. Available at: http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/oil-gas/applications-and-permits/environmental-permit-types-information/recycling/. Accessed Jan 23 2017
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq
Richardson N, Gottlieb M, Krupnick, A, & Wiseman, H (2013) The state of state shale gas regulation. Available at: http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF-Rpt-StateofStateRegs_Report.pdf
Safe Drinking Water Act; 42 U.S.C. § 399f et seq
Shaffer DL, Arias Chavez LH, Ben-Sasson M, Romero-Vargas Castrillón S, Yip NY, Elimelech M (2013) Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ Sci Technol 47(17):9569–9583
Stewart M, Arnold K (2011) Produced water treatment field manual. Gulf Professional Publishing, Waltham
Texas Tax Code
Veil J (2015) US produced water volumes and management practices in 2012. Report prepared for the Ground Water Protection Council
Veil J, Puder MG, Elcock D, Redweik RJ Jr (2004) A white paper describing produced water from production of crude oil, natural gas, and coal bed methane. Available at: http://www.veilenvironmental.com/publications/pw/ProducedWatersWP0401.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Webb, R., Zodrow, K.R. (2020). Disposal of Water for Hydraulic Fracturing: Case Study on the U.S.. In: Buono, R., López Gunn, E., McKay, J., Staddon, C. (eds) Regulating Water Security in Unconventional Oil and Gas. Water Security in a New World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18342-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18342-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18341-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18342-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)