Skip to main content

Uncertain Evidence for Probabilistic Relational Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2019)

Abstract

Standard approaches for inference in probabilistic relational models include lifted variable elimination (LVE) for single queries. To efficiently handle multiple queries, the lifted junction tree algorithm (LJT) uses a first-order cluster representation of a model, employing LVE as a subroutine in its steps. LVE and LJT can only handle certain evidence. However, most events are not certain. The purpose of this paper is twofold, (i) to adapt LVE, presenting LVE\(^{evi}\), to handle uncertain evidence and (ii) to incorporate uncertain evidence for multiple queries in LJT, presenting LJT\(^{evi}\). With LVE\(^{evi}\) and LJT\(^{evi}\), we can handle uncertain evidence for probabilistic relational models, while benefiting from the lifting idea. Further, we show that uncertain evidence does not have a detrimental effect on completeness results and leads to similar runtimes as certain evidence.

This research originated from the Big Data project being part of Joint Lab 1, funded by Cisco Systems Germany, at the centre COPICOH, University of Lübeck.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmadi, B., Kersting, K., Mladenov, M., Natarajan, S.: Exploiting symmetries for scaling loopy belief propagation and relational training. Mach. Learn. 92(1), 91–132 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Braun, T., Möller, R.: Lifted junction tree algorithm. In: Friedrich, G., Helmert, M., Wotawa, F. (eds.) KI 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9904, pp. 30–42. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46073-4_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Braun, T., Möller, R.: Counting and conjunctive queries in the lifted junction tree algorithm - extended version. In: Croitoru, M., Marquis, P., Rudolph, S., Stapleton, G. (eds.) GKR 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10775, pp. 54–72. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78102-0_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Braun, T., Möller, R.: Parameterised queries and lifted query answering. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2018, pp. 4980–4986 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van den Broeck, G., Davis, J.: Conditioning in first-order knowledge compilation and lifted probabilistic inference. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–7. AAAI Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. van den Broeck, G., Taghipour, N., Meert, W., Davis, J., Raedt, L.D.: Lifted probabilistic inference by first-order knowledge compilation. In: IJCAI-11 Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on AI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chan, H., Darwiche, A.: On the revision of probabilistic beliefs using uncertain evidence. Artif. Intell. 163(1), 67–90 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dalvi, N., Suciu, D.: Efficient query evaluation on probabilistic databases. VLDB J. Int. J. Very Large Data Bases 16(4), 523–544 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Das, M., Wu, Y., Khot, T., Kersting, K., Natarajan, S.: Scaling lifted probabilistic inference and learning via graph databases. In: Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 738–746 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jeffrey, R.C.: The Logic of Decision. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lauritzen, S.L., Spiegelhalter, D.J.: Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 50, 157–224 (1988)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Milch, B., Zettelmoyer, L.S., Kersting, K., Haimes, M., Kaelbling, L.P.: Lifted probabilistic inference with counting formulas. In: AAAI-08 Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on AI, pp. 1062–1068 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Pearl, J.: On two pseudo-paradoxes in Bayesian analysis. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 32(1–4), 171–177 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng, Y., Zhang, S., Pan, R.: Bayesian network reasoning with uncertain evidences. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 18(05), 539–564 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Poole, D.: First-order probabilistic inference. In: IJCAI-03 Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on AI (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Salvo Braz, R., Amir, E., Roth, D.: Lifted first-order probabilistic inference. In: IJCAI-05 Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on AI (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steinhäuser, J., Kühlein, T.: Role of the general practitioner. In: Patient Blood Management, pp. 61–65. Thieme, Stuttgart (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Suciu, D., Olteanu, D., Ré, C., Koch, C.: Probabilistic databases. Synth. Lect. Data Manage. 3(2), 1–180 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Taghipour, N., Fierens, D., van den Broeck, G., Davis, J., Blockeel, H.: Completeness results for lifted variable elimination. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on AI and Statistics, pp. 572–580 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Taghipour, N., Fierens, D., Davis, J., Blockeel, H.: Lifted variable elimination: decoupling the operators from the constraint language. J. AI Res. 47(1), 393–439 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Theodorsson, E.: Uncertainty in measurement and total error: tools for coping with diagnostic uncertainty. Clin. Lab. Med. 37(1), 15–34 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thimm, M., Kern-Isberner, G.: On probabilistic inference in relational conditional logics. Logic J. IGPL 20(5), 872–908 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Wemmenhove, B., Mooij, J.M., Wiegerinck, W., Leisink, M., Kappen, H.J., Neijt, J.P.: Inference in the promedas medical expert system. In: Bellazzi, R., Abu-Hanna, A., Hunter, J. (eds.) AIME 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4594, pp. 456–460. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73599-1_61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel Gehrke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gehrke, M., Braun, T., Möller, R. (2019). Uncertain Evidence for Probabilistic Relational Models. In: Meurs, MJ., Rudzicz, F. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11489. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18305-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18305-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18304-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18305-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics