Skip to main content

Adaptation of the Rules of the Models of Games with Nature for the Design of Safety Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction (ITDRR 2017)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 516))

  • 311 Accesses

Abstract

The article presents a manner of formulating the problem of designing safety systems in terms of decision-making problems solved with the use of the models of the so-called games with nature. The models of this type are very frequently used to make decisions under conditions of uncertainty. The situation also occurs in the process of designing safety systems. For the purposes of solving the problem, the appropriate understanding of the basic components of the models of games with nature, i.e. the game strategy and the state of nature, was assumed. In this context, a definition of a system and a safety system was provided, along with an interpretation of the relationships between safety system elements (risk reduction measures) and domain elements (hazard factors/sources, hazards), on account of which these systems are designed. The specificity of the functioning of safety systems also required a modification of the decision rules applied within the models used. The modification was illustrated with the example of Wald’s rule. A general concept of formulating the problem of designing safety systems as a decision-making problem was presented, along with the general algorithm of selecting risk reduction measures for safety systems with the use of the modified rules of the models of games with nature. Next, a mathematical model of the research problem was provided, including: creation of the risk reduction measure efficacy matrix, creation of the hazard source – hazard relationship matrix, determination of the payoff matrix, and the modification of decision rules. Usually, there is a need to select more than one risk reduction measure. An already developed original concept of sequential selection of these measures was used. The application of the rule adaptation proposed here was illustrated with an example of a fire protection system for railway vehicles. Hazard sources were identified and hazards related to electrical systems in railway vehicles were formulated. A list of examples of risk reduction measures which may form a safety system was presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adger, W.N.: Vulnerability. Glob. Environ. Chang. 16(3), 268–281 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aven, T.: Risk Analysis (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aven, T., Heide, B.: Reliability and validity of risk analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(11), 1862–1868 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cempel, C.: Teoria i inżynieria systemów-zasady i zastosowania myślenia systemowego. ITE Radom, Radom (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gill, A.: Koncepcja zastosowania reguł decyzyjnych w doborze środków redukcji ryzyka zagrożeń. Pr. Nauk. Politech. Warsz. Transp, pp.181–190 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gill, A., Kadziński, A.: Hazard identification model. In: Proceedings of 20th International Scientific Conference. Transport Means (5–7 October 2016, Juodkrante, Lithuania), pp. 885–890. Kaunas University of Technology (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gill, A., Smoczyński, P.: Layered model for convenient designing of safety system upgrades in railways. Saf. Sci., in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.11.024

  8. Girdner, N.: An integrated system safety model of the national airspace system. In: Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harms-Ringdahl, L.: Analysis of safety functions and barriers in accidents. Saf. Sci. 47(3), 353–363 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harms-Ringdahl, L.: Guide to safety analysis for accident prevention. IRS Riskhantering AB (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes, B.P., et al.: System theory and safety models in Swedish, UK, Dutch and Australian road safety strategies. Accid. Anal. Prev. 74, 271–278 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jędrzejczyk, Z., et al.: Badania operacyjne w przykładach i zadaniach. PWN, Warszawa (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kadziński, A.: Studium wybranych aspektów niezawodności systemów oraz obiektów pojazdów szynowych (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kadziński, A., et al.: The concept of method and models for risk management of hazards generated at railway crossings. In: Proceedings of 20th International Scientific Conference. Transport Means (5–7 October 2016, Juodkrante, Lithuania), Kaunas, Lithunania, pp. 297–302 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Majchrzyk, D., Tarka, I.: Kable i przewody elektryczne przeznaczone do taboru szynowego. Pr. Inst. Kolejnictwa. 149, 14–21 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer, T., Reniers, G.: Engineering Risk Management. De Gruyter (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sikora, W.: Badania operacyjne. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, Y., et al.: Multilayered impact evaluation model for attacking missions. IEEE Syst. J. 10(4), 1304–1315 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsenina, E.V., et al.: Indication of competitiveness of the potential of the region through hurwitz and wald criteria. Glob. J. Pure Appl. Math. 12(1), 325–335 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Turskis, Z., et al.: Multi-criteria optimization system for decision making in construction design and management. Eng. Econ. 1(1), 7–17 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vincoli, J.W.: Basic Guide to System Safety, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wald, A.: Statistical decision functions which minimize the maximum risk. Ann. Math. 46(2), 265–280 (1945)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, X., Du, R.: A solution to decision making under uncertainty. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 45(1), 320–324 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yemets, O.A., Ustian, N.Y.: Games with combinatorial constraints. Cybern. Syst. Anal. 44(4), 575–581 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zavadskas, E.K., et al.: Development of software for multiple criteria evaluation. Informatica 14(2), 259–272 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research work financed with the means of statutory activities of Faculty of Machines and Transport, Poznan University of Technology, 05/52/DSPB/0280.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Gill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gill, A., Smoczyński, P. (2019). Adaptation of the Rules of the Models of Games with Nature for the Design of Safety Systems. In: Murayama, Y., Velev, D., Zlateva, P. (eds) Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction. ITDRR 2017. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 516. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18293-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18293-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18292-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18293-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics