Skip to main content

Multi-objective Optimisation of Distributed Generation Units in Unbalanced Distribution Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart and Sustainable Engineering for Next Generation Applications (ELECOM 2018)

Abstract

Due to the increased concern about the environment, distributed generation (DG) units have been widely introduced to the power system. However, DG units may have positive and negative impacts on the voltage profile and active power loss of a power system, depending on their size and location. In this paper, three algorithms namely multi-objective particle swarm optimisation (MOPSO), non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) and strength pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2) were used to identify the optimum size, location and type of a DG unit in an unbalanced distribution system. The simulations were performed on the IEEE 34 Node Test Feeder System using OpenDSS and MATLAB such that the total active power loss and the voltage deviation are reduced. The effectiveness of the algorithms were evaluated based on the computation time and performance metrics such as generational distance, pure diversity and spread. It was found that all the three algorithms were suitable for the optimisation. However, NSGA-II had the lowest average computation time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arefi, A., Shahnia, F., Ledwich, G.: Electric distribution network management and control. Power Systems, pp. 40–42. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kayal, P., Khan, C.M., Chanda, C.K.: Selection of distributed generation for distribution network: study in multi-criteria framework. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Energy and Communication (CIEC), Calcutta, India, 31 January–2 February 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Musa, H., Adamu, S.S.: Enhanced PSO based multi-objective distributed generation placement and sizing for power loss reduction and voltage stability index improvement. In: Engitech 2013, Cleveland, OH, USA, 21–23 May 2013, pp. 1–6 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baran, M.E., El-Markaby, I.: Fault analysis on distribution feeders with distributed generators. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1757–1764 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ameli, A., Bahrami, S., Khazaeli, F., Haghifam, M.: A multiobjective particle swarm optimisation for sizing and placement of DGs from DG owner’s and distribution company’s viewpoints. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., pp. 1831–1840 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wartana, I.M.: A multi-objective problems for optimal integration of the dg to the grid using the NSGA-II. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Quality in Research, Lombok, Indonesia, 10–13 August 2015, pp. 106–110 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zou, K., Agalgaonkar, A.P., Muttaqi, K.M., Perera, S.: Multi-objective optimisation for distribution system planning with renewable energy resources. In: 2010 IEEE International Energy Conference, Bahrain, 18–22 December 2010, pp. 670–675 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zeng, Y., Sun, Y.: Comparison of multiobjective particle swarm optimization and evolutionary algorithms for optimal reactive power dispatch problem. In: 2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Beijing, China, 6–11 July 2014, pp. 258–265 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. El-Zonkoly, A.M.: Optimal placement of multi-distributed generation units including different load models using particle swarm optimisation. Swarm Evol. Comput. 1, 50–59 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anwar, A., Pota, H.R.: Optimum allocation and sizing of DG unit for efficiency enhancement of distribution system. In: 2012 IEEE International Power Engineering and Optimisation Conference (PEOCO2012), Maleka, Malaysia, 6–7 June 2012, pp. 165–170 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nayeripour, M., Mahboubi-Moghaddam, E., Aghaei, J., Azizi-Vahed, A.: Multi-Objective placement and sizing of DGs in distribution networks ensuring transient stability using hybrid evolutionary algorithm. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 25, 759–767 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vachhani, V.L., Dabhi, V.K., Prajapathi, H.B.: Improving NSGA-II For solving muti-objective function optimisation problems. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI 2016), Coimbatore, India, 7–9 Jan 2016, pp. 1–6 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coello Coello, C.A., Lechuga, M.S.: MOPSO: a proposal for multiobjective particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Honolulu, USA, 12–17 May 2002, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 257–271 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Caello, C., Dhaenens, C., Jourdan, L.: Advances in Multi-Objective Nature Inspired Computing. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 272, p. 52. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Godinez, A.C., Espinosa, L.E.M, Montes, E.M.: An experimental comparison of multiobjective algorithms: NSGAII and OMOPSO. In: 2010 IEEE Electronics, Robotics and Automative Mechanics Conference, Morelos, Mexico, 26 September–1 October 2010, pp. 1–6 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eskandari, H., Geiger, C.D., Lamont, G.B.: FastPGA: a dynamic population sizing approach for solving expensive multiobjective optimization problems. In Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) 4th International Conference Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimisation, EMO 2007, Proceedings, Matsushima, Japan, March 5–8 2007, pp. 141–155 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fuller, J., Xu, Y.: IEEE PES AMPS DSAS test feeder working group. IEEE Power and Energy Society. http://sites.ieee.org/pes-testfeeders/resources/

  20. Muller, M., Gutbrod K.G., Ramshorn, C., Vogt, R.: Meteoblue Weather Phoenix. https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/forecast/week/phoenix_united-states-of-america_5308655

Download references

Acknowledgments

Pamela Ramsami expresses her sincere gratitude to the Mauritius Research Council for the funding of the research through the Post Graduate Research Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert T. F. Ah King .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ramsami, P., Ah King, R.T.F. (2019). Multi-objective Optimisation of Distributed Generation Units in Unbalanced Distribution Systems. In: Fleming, P., Lacquet, B., Sanei, S., Deb, K., Jakobsson, A. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Engineering for Next Generation Applications. ELECOM 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 561. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18240-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18240-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18239-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18240-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics