Abstract
A successful holiday may well involve aimless wandering and chance encounters without overdue concern for timeframe or final destination. Researching and writing a dissertation is not a holiday. Nonetheless, there is no reason why students should not both enjoy the experience and reach the desired goal—the two are not mutually exclusive. The path to a completed dissertation is intended to involve discoveries and surprises. It is not possible to know in advance all the obstacles and side tracks that might be encountered. However, some pre-departure planning can help anticipate potential problems, and make them easier to recognise and solve, if not avoid altogether. For potential and new students: taking time to think about who you are, what you want to achieve, and why, are important first steps towards reaching your final goal. Research suggests that it is the hardy students who succeed. This chapter proposes that asking some simple questions before setting out is a successful strategy for pre-empting self-sabotaging behaviours. By identifying personal strengths and weaknesses and establishing clear personal goals before committing to their final destination, research students can be better equipped for the doctoral journey. The chapter also provides practical questions and planning tools for students to complete their pre-departure screening.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brailsford, I. 2010. “Motives and aspirations for doctoral study: Career, personal, and inter-personal factors in the decision to embark on a history PhD.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 5: 15–27.
Guerin, C., A. Jayatilaka, and D. Ranasinghe. 2015. “Why start a higher degree by research? An exploratory factor analysis of motivations to undertake doctoral studies.” Higher Education Research & Development 34 (1): 89–104. https://doi.org/10.28945/71010.1080/07294360.2014.934663.
Kearns, H., and M. Gardiner. 2007. “Is it time well spent? The relationship between time management behaviours, perceived effectiveness and work-related morale and distress in a university context.” Higher Education Research & Development 26 (2): 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701310839.
Kearns, H., M. Gardiner, and K. Marshall. 2008. “Innovation in PhD completion: The hardy shall succeed (and be happy!).” Higher Education Research & Development 27 (1): 7–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658781.
Kiley, M. 2009. “Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46 (3): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903069001.
Kiley, M., and G. Wisker. 2009. “Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing.” Higher Education Research and Development 28 (4): 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903067930.
Lovitts, B. E. 2008. “The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn’t and why.” Journal of Higher Education 79 (3): 296–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vincent, A. (2019). Who Am I, Where Am I Going on This Journey, and Why?. In: Brien, D.L., Batty, C., Ellison, E., Owens, A. (eds) The Doctoral Experience. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18199-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18199-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18198-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18199-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)