Skip to main content

Researching Within Online Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Doctoral Experience
  • 480 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines how a flexible approach to researching within online social communities may provide for a connected and creative research journey. Social media platforms are low cost and accessible tools that afford global networking potential and can engage wider audiences for research findings. Digital platforms annul temporal and geographical boundaries and allow for productive meanderings with readers. For sole researchers, research teams, or as forms of data collection, social media and other online platforms can be a useful digital research tool; however, they can require careful navigation. Be it within Facebook, Twitter, a niche online community, or a blog; the role of researcher and participant is dynamic, and quantitative and qualitative data provides direct feedback. Designing effective methodologies for digital community research requires an interdisciplinary approach that recognises ethical and practical considerations ranging from consent, privacy, moderation and potential incivility. This chapter will map, using a reflective case study, practical strategies for minimising risk and managing methodologies. Also discussed will be how ongoing reflection on online relationships can shape the research process and final work, how evolving digital communities can expand traditional academic forums, and some current trends in open-access publishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alter, A. 2015. “Margaret Atwood, digital deep-diver, writes ‘the heart goes last’.” The New York Times, 27 September. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/28/books/margaret-atwood-digital-deep-diver-writes-the-heart-goes-last.html.

  • Association of Internet Researchers. 2012. Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AOIR Ethics Committee (Version 2.0). https://aoir.org/ethics.

  • Batty, C., and M. Berry. 2016. “Constellations and connections: The playful space of the creative practice research degree.” Journal of Media Practice 16 (3): 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, K. 2013. “Virtual studio practices: Visual artists, social media and creativity.” Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts 5 (1): 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, N., and J. Higgs. 2011. “Researching in wicked practice spaces.” In Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching: Living Research, edited by Joy Higgs, Angie Titchen, Debbie Horsefall and Donna Bridges. Boston: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K., M. Duckham, M. Guillemin, A. Hunter, J. McVernon, C. O’Keefe, C. Pitkin, S. Prawer, R. Sinnott, D. Warr, and J. Waycott. 2015. Guidelines for the Ethical Use of Digital Data in Human Research. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach, G., and J. E. Till. 2001. “Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 323 (7321): 1103–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming-May, R. A., and H. Green. 2016. “Digital innovations in poetry: Practices of creative writing faculty in online literary publishing.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (4): 859–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flew, T. 2017. “Social media and the cultural and creative industries.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, edited by Jean Burgess, Alice E. Marwick, and Thomas Poell. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauth, N. 2016. Creative Writing and the Radical: Teaching and Learning the Fiction of the Future. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, J., and G. Harper. 2013. Research Methods in Creative Writing. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Literat, I. 2017. “Facilitating creative participation and collaboration in online spaces: The impact of social and technological factors in enabling sustainable engagement.” Digital Creativity 28 (2): 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MIT Media Lab. 2017. Shelley: Human-AI Collaborated Horror Stories. https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/shelley/overview.

  • Moreno, M. A., N. Gonui, P. S. Moreno, and D. Diekema. 2013. “Ethics of social media research: Common concerns and practical considerations.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 16 (9): 708–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Health and Medical Research Council. 2007. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007, updated May 2015. Canberra, ACT: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A., and N. Henry. 2015. “How can we stem the tide of online harassment and abuse?” The Conversation, 5 October. https://theconversation.com/how-can-we-stem-the-tide-of-online-harassment-and-abuse-48387.

  • Prensky, M. 2001. “Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1.” On the Horizon 9 (5): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C., and S. Lange. 2017. “Looking: Thinking: Making: How is digital culture influencing practice?” Spark: UAL Creative Teaching and Learning Journal 2 (2): 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skains, L. 2017. “The adaptive process of multimodal composition: How developing tacit knowledge of digital tools affects creative writing.” Computers and Composition 43: 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivid Ideas. 2017. “Elevating creativity through artificial intelligence with Ross Goodwin.” Human & Machine 2017 Conference: The Next Great Creative Partnership. https://www.vividsydney.com/elevating-creativity-through-artificial-intelligence-ross-goodwin.

  • Wattpad. 2016. Almost 90% of Wattpad’s 250 Million Stories are Serialized. https://company.wattpad.com/blog/2016/05/18/almost-90-of-wattpads-250-million-stories-are-serialized-find-out-why.

  • Wattpad. 2018. Press. https://company.wattpad.com/press.

  • Williams, M. L., P. Burnap, and L. Sloan. 2017. “Towards an ethical framework for publishing Twitter data in social research: Taking into account users’ views, online context and algorithmic estimation.” Sociology 51 (6): 1149–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susannah Oddi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oddi, S. (2019). Researching Within Online Communities. In: Brien, D.L., Batty, C., Ellison, E., Owens, A. (eds) The Doctoral Experience. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18199-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18199-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18198-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18199-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics